Triadic Love Structure in Zaynab by Muhammad Husain Haykal

Authors

  • Devira Kumala Dewi Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang; Indonesia
  • Abdul Muntaqim Al Anshory Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang; Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37680/lingua_franca.v5i1.9169

Keywords:

Arabic literature, emotional conflict, psychological literary studies, triangular theory of love

Abstract

This study examines the representation of love in Zaynab by Muhammad Husain Haykal through the triadic structure of love. The research departs from the assumption that love in the novel is not merely portrayed as romantic attachment but as a relational configuration shaped by personal emotion and socio-cultural constraints. Using a qualitative descriptive method with textual analysis, this study identifies and categorizes narrative evidence into three dimensions: intimacy, passion, and commitment. The findings reveal that intimacy is constructed through emotional openness, secrecy, and psychological attachment, while passion appears in intense affective reactions and longing. However, commitment is predominantly formed through familial authority and social obligation rather than mutual emotional choice. This imbalance among the three dimensions prevents the realization of a harmonious love structure and results in psychological conflict and narrative tragedy. The study demonstrates that love in Zaynab by Muhammad Husain Haykal operates as a complex relational structure in which cultural norms significantly influence emotional experience. By analyzing the interaction among intimacy, passion, and commitment, this research highlights how socio-cultural pressures reshape personal affection and contribute to the tragic development of the protagonist.

References

Acevedo, B. P., & Aron, A. (2009). Does A Long-Term Relationship Kill Romantic Love? Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014226

Braida, D., Conti, L., & Moretti, F. (2023). Emotional Integration and Relationship Stability: Revisiting Sternberg’s Triangular Model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(6), 1523–1541. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221134567

Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). The Science of Intimate Relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015111

George, L. (2025). Marriage as Social Regulation in Middle Eastern Fiction. Comparative Literature Review, 48(1), 77–94.

Grindrod, J. (2023). Anti-Skepticism Under a Linguistic Guise. Topoi, 42, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09850-w

Hassan, M. (2024). Tragedy and Female Desire in Arabic Realist Novels. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies, 8(1), 110–125.

Impett, E. A., Muise, A., & Peragine, D. (2019). Sexual Communal Strength and Relationship Well-Being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.002

Karandashev, V. (2015). A Cultural Perspective on Romantic Love. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42683-9

Martinez, J. (2023). Relational Psychology and Narrative Love Structures. Literature and Psychology, 69(2), 89–105.

Rahman, A. (2022). Patriarchal Authority and Romantic Agency in Classical Arabic Fiction. Journal of Arabic Literature, 53(3), 231–250.

Ralte, L. (2024). Commitment, Motivation, and Relational Satisfaction in Collectivist Cultures. Journal of Family Studies, 30(2), 214–229.

Regan, P. C. (2017). The Mating Game: A Primer on Love, Sex, and Marriage (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119

Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Love Is a Story: A New Theory of Relationships. Oxford University Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (2020). The New Psychology of Love (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Published

2026-03-12

How to Cite

Dewi, D. K., & Al Anshory, A. M. (2026). Triadic Love Structure in Zaynab by Muhammad Husain Haykal. Lingua Franca, 5(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.37680/lingua_franca.v5i1.9169