Analisis Konsumsi Energi dan Emisi GRK terhadap Biaya Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia

Analysis of Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions on the Costs of Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia

Authors

  • Septiana Sihombing Politeknik Manufaktur Negeri Bangka Belitung, Indonesia
  • Dian Mahardi Lestari Politeknik Lembaga Pendidikan dan Pengembangan Profesi Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Mutiah Fitriani Nasution Universitas Harapan Medan, Indonesia
  • Lamia Eva Rini Politeknik Manufaktur Negeri Bangka Belitung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37680/jcd.v7i1.6899

Keywords:

Cost Analysis, Energy Consumption, Environmental Impact, GHG Emissions, Manufacturing Industry

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of fossil fuel and electricity consumption on total costs, with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as an intervening variable in manufacturing firms in Indonesia. The manufacturing industry is one of the largest energy consumers, significantly contributing to GHG emissions and increasing environmental concerns. This study uses secondary data from the Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) from 2020 to 2023, covering 96 manufacturing firms selected through purposive sampling. Data analysis was conducted using regression with path analysis through WarpPLS 7.0 software. The results show that: (1) GHG emissions have a positive and significant effect on coal, diesel, and other fuels (gasoline, kerosene, lubricants), a negative and significant effect on electricity, and a positive and significant effect on gas. (2) Total costs have a positive but insignificant effect on coal and diesel, a negative but insignificant effect on gas and other fuels (gasoline, kerosene, lubricants), and a negative and significant effect on GHG emissions. (3) Total costs through GHG emissions have a positive and significant influence on coal and diesel, a negative and insignificant effect on gas and other fuels, and a negative and significant effect on electricity. This study contributes to understanding how energy consumption affects corporate expenses and environmental impact. The findings suggest that increasing electricity use and reducing fossil fuel consumption can help lower emissions and optimize costs. Future research should explore the impact of government incentives on corporate energy efficiency strategies.

References

Agency, E. E. (2023). C02 Emission. Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management, 600–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25984-5_300288

Burkhardt, J., Gillingham, K. T., & Kopalle, P. K. (2023). Field Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Pricing on Residential Electricity Conservation. Management Science, 69(12), 7784–7798. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.02074

Data, P., Teknologi, D. A. N., Dan, E., Daya, S., Energi, K., Sumber, D. A. N., & Mineral, D. (2018). Inventarisasi Emisi GRK.

de Soysa, I. (2025). Green with envy? The effects of inequality and equity within and across social groups on greenhouse gas emissions, 1990–2020. World Development, 188(December 2024), 106885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106885

Defra. (2011). Guidelines to DEFRA / DECC’s GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting. London: The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, August.

Herlina, L., Saka, D., Muji, T., Haris, A., Nardey, S., & Ardhyarini, N. (2025). Indonesia ’ s country-specific CO 2 emission factor based on gas fuels for greenhouse gas inventory in the energy sector ☆. Environmental Pollution, 368(October 2024), 125749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125749

Karrabi, M., Jabari, F., & Foroud, A. A. (2025). A green ammonia and solar-driven multi-generation system: Thermo-economic model and optimization considering molten salt thermal energy storage, fuel cell vehicles, and power-to-gas. Energy Conversion and Management, 323(PA), 119226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119226

Lin, T., Chiu, Y., Chen, C., & Ji, L. (2025). Geoenergy Science and Engineering Renewable energy consumption efficiency , greenhouse gas emission efficiency , and climate change in Europe. 247(July 2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213665

Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia, K. (2021). Permen LHK No.04 Tahun 2021`. Ministry of Environment and Forestry Republic of Indonesia, 3, 1–319.

Liu, T., & Cao, X. (2024). Going Green: How Executive Environmental Awareness and Green Innovation Drive Corporate Sustainable Development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01788-1

Lou, J., Hu, G., Shen, X., & Cui, R. Y. (2025). Quantifying the economy-wide employment effects of coal-fired power plants: Two different cases China and the United States. Applied Energy, 377(April 2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124561

Luo, W., & Cheng, J. (2023). Transition to sustainable business models for green economic recovery: role of financial literacy, innovation and environmental sustainability. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(6), 3787–3810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09408-1

Porter, M. E., & Van Der Linde, C. (1995). American Economic Association Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Source: The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138392

Rokhmawati, A. (2023). The Effects of Carbon Taxes on Firms’ Carbon Emission: Simulation Model in Indonesia (Vol. 2022). Atlantis Press International BV. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-284-2_63

Rokhmawati, A., Sugiyono, A., Efni, Y., & Wasnury, R. (2023). Quantifying social costs of coal-fired power plant generation. Geography and Sustainability, 4(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2022.12.004

Su, Z., Wang, H., Zhao, G., & Xie, C. (2024). How digital government mediate the influence of fossil fuels on green innovation : Evidence from China ’ s a-share industrial enterprises ☆ , ☆☆. Resources Policy, 91(March), 104958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104958

Undang-Undang Nomor 16. (2016). Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengesahan Paris Agreement To The United Nations Framework Convention On Climate Change (Persetujuan Paris Atas Konvensi Kerangka Kerja Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa mengenai Perubahan Iklim). Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia, 71. https://jdih.setneg.go.id/Produk

Wang, K., Zhong, C., & Yu, R. (2024). The greenhouse gas reduction effect of critical peak pricing for industrial electricity: Evidence from 285 Chinese cities, 2003–2019. Energy Policy, 190(May), 114147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114147

Wen, J., Ali, W., Hussain, J., Khan, N. A., Hussain, H., Ali, N., & Akhtar, R. (2022). Dynamics between green innovation and environmental quality: new insights into South Asian economies. Economia Politica, 39(2), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-021-00248-2

Zhang, L., Chen, X., & Xu, Z. (2024). Can development zones reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions of enterprises ? Evidence from China. Journal of Asian Economics, 95(November), 101845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2024.101845

Zhang, P., & Hao, D. (2023). Enterprise financial management and fossil fuel energy efficiency for green. Resources Policy, 84(March), 103763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103763

Zuberi, M. J. S., Shehabi, A., & Rao, P. (2024). International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Cross-sectoral assessment of CO 2 capture from U . S . industrial flue gases for fuels and chemicals manufacture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 135(May), 104137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104137

Downloads

Published

2025-02-07

How to Cite

Sihombing, S., Mahardi Lestari, D., Fitriani Nasution, M., & Eva Rini, L. (2025). Analisis Konsumsi Energi dan Emisi GRK terhadap Biaya Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia: Analysis of Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions on the Costs of Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia. Journal of Community Development and Disaster Management, 7(1), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.37680/jcd.v7i1.6899