Religious Authority and Social-Political Dynamics in National Awakening Party Candidate Recruitment Reform

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 5, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Muharrik: Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Sugiarto Sugiarto
Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
Laila Kholid Alfirdaus
Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
Rina Martini
Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics of PKB Central Java’s open recruitment mechanism for legislative candidates in the 2024 election and analyzes whether the reform contributed to substantive internal democratization. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected through in-depth interviews with party officials, aspirants, and local brokers across Pati, Rembang, and Kudus, complemented by document analysis of recruitment guidelines, interview evaluations, and administrative procedures. The findings show that the reform generated a form of hybrid openness: while the process expanded access, standardized interviews, and increased procedural transparency, final decisions remained strongly shaped by longstanding NU-based religious authority, particularly kyai endorsements and pesantren networks. Meritocratic tools such as interview scoring and documentation review enhanced procedural clarity but carried limited weight in determining rankings, reflecting selective meritocracy rather than full institutional transformation. The study also reveals significant district-level variation, with Kudus exhibiting greater alignment between assessment outcomes and final placement compared to the more hierarchical environments of Pati and Rembang. These patterns position PKB’s reform between symbolic and substantive democratization, producing visible improvements without altering deeper authority structures. The study contributes to the literature on internal party democracy by demonstrating how socioreligious legitimacy, territorial power structures, and institutional layering shape the outcomes of organizational reform in Islamic-oriented political parties in Indonesia.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2019). Politik uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan clientelisme pada pemilu legislatif 2014. Yayasan Obor.
  2. Basri, S. (2019). Transparansi Rekrutmen Caleg dalam Partai Politik. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan.
  3. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  4. Carothers, T. (2019). Democracies Divided. Brookings Institution Press.
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design. SAGE Publications.
  6. Fealy, G. (2019). Islamic authority, social media, and cultural contestation. Indonesia and the Malay World, 47(139), 1–12.
  7. Fealy, G., & Bush, R. (2022). Faith and Politics in Indonesia: The Role of Nahdlatul Ulama. Indonesia.
  8. Firmanzah. (2011). Marketing Politik: Antara Pemahaman dan Realitas. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  9. Gauja, A. (2017). Party Reform: The Causes, Challenges, and Consequences of Organizational Change. Oxford University Press.
  10. Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy. Party Politics.
  11. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications.
  12. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining Institutional Change. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Mietzner, M. (2018). Party politics, clientelism and electoral strategy in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 3–26.
  14. Norris, P. (2006a). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Norris, P. (2019). Political communication in a changing world. Oxford University Press.
  16. Panebianco, A. (1988). Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Rahat, G., & Hazan, R. (2001). Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework. Party Politics.
  18. Rofieq, A. (2009). Rekrutmen Politik di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Prospek. Jurnal Politik.
  19. Scarrow, S. (2022). Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford University Press.
  20. Tomsa, D. (2020). Islam, Parties, and Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs.
  21. Ufen, A. (2019). Religious Authority and Electoral Politics in Indonesia. South East Asia Research.
  22. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE Publications.