Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Strategi Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Generative Artificial Intelligence untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Merancang Pembelajaran Calon Guru Fisika
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37680/ssa.10520Keywords:
Teaching Materials; Generative Artificial Intelligence; Physics Learning Strategies; the ability to design learning; ADDIEAbstract
The development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) provides new opportunities in the development of learning in higher education, including in the preparation of teaching materials that support the pedagogic competence of prospective teachers. However, the teaching materials in the Physics Learning Strategy Course are still dominated by the presentation of theory and have not integrated the systematic use of GenAI in the learning design process. This research aims to develop valid, practical, and effective teaching materials for GenAI-based Physics Learning Strategies to improve the ability to design learning for prospective physics teachers. The research uses the Research and Development (R&D) method with the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) model. The research subjects amounted to 34 students of the Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Malikussaleh University. Data collection is carried out through expert validation sheets, student response questionnaires, rubrics on learning design ability assessments, observations, and documentation. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis of percentage, Normalized Gain (N-Gain), and effect size (Cohen's d). The results of the study showed that the teaching materials obtained a very good category based on the validation of media experts (84.57%–91.12%), material experts (86.18%–94.26%), and linguists (89.36%–93.21%). The results of the practicality test also showed a very practical category with a percentage of 89.15% in individual tests, 91.42% in small group tests, and 94.08% in field tests. The effectiveness of teaching materials was shown by the improvement of the ability to design learning with an N-Gain value of 0.79 and learning strategy competence of 0.76 which was in the high category, and effect size (Cohen's d) of 1.48 and 1.36 respectively which showed a very large effect. Thus, the GenAI-based teaching materials developed meet the criteria of valid, practical, and effective so that they are suitable for use as a learning resource in the Physics Learning Strategy Course.References
Albadarin, Y., Saqr, M., Pope, N., & Tukiainen, M. (2024). A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00138-2
Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2024). ChatGPT in the higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 127(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102411
Branch, R. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Garay Abad, L., & Hattie, J. (2025). The impact of teaching materials on instructional design and teacher development. Frontiers in Education, 10(April), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1577721
Huang, Y., Chen, S., Zhang, W., & Chen, M. (2026). Can Generative AI Feedback Effectively Enhance Learning Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis of 36 Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies. Education Sciences, 16(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060816
Irwanto, I., & Saputra, B. (2026). Studi Literatur Pengembangan Model ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) Dalam Penelitian R and D. Jurnal PPS-TP, 14(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.23960/jt.v14i1.2026.1415
Kharis, S. A. A., Arisanty, M., & Zili, A. H. A. (2024). Pengalaman dan Perspektif Pendidik terhadap Penggunaan ChatGPT dalam Pengajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan, 33(1), 515–524. https://doi.org/10.32585/jp.v33i1.5004
Mo, F., Huang, J., Yang, Y., Özen, Z., Maeda, Y., & Olenchak, F. R. (2026). Undergraduate students’ learning outcomes with ChatGPT: A meta-analytic study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10(October 2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100536
Nurharyanto, D. W., Abdullah, S., Hasanuddin, M. I., & Hasanuddin, M. I. (2026). Analisis Kemampuan Penyusunan Modul Ajar Mahasiswa Calon Guru dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Journal of Education Research, 7(1), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v7i1.2984
Nurulsari, N., Abdurrahman, A., Suyanto, E., Distrik, I. W., & Ertikanto, C. (2023). Soft Scaffolding Strategy: An Adaptive Post-Pandemic Learning to Facilitate Prospective Physics Teacher’s PCK. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 12(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v12i1.16071
Rafiah, J. A., & Winarti, W. (2024). CoRe dan PaP-eRs Test untuk Mengukur Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Calon Guru Fisika. Edusainstika: Jurnal Pembelajaran MIPA, 4(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.31958/je.v4i2.12339
Romadhoni, E. D. (2024). Analisis Penggunaan ChatGPT Dalam Penulisan Modul Ajar Oleh Guru di SDN Karah I. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 12(1), 2504–2515. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-penelitian-pgsd/article/view/59104/45951
Supriyono, A., Lesmono, A. D., & Prihandono, T. (2024). Dampak dan Tantangan Pemanfaatan ChatGPT dalam Pembelajaran pada Kurikulum Merdeka: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v9i2.5214
Yusuf, M. S. (2023). Analisis technological pedagogical and content knowledge mahasiswa calon guru fisika. Yusuf, M. S. (2023). Analisis technological pedagogical andDoctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Malang.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Desy Sari Ayunda, Nurmala Sari, Muhammad Muhammad, Novi Sari Liani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




