Digital Hermeneutics and Religious Authority in the ChatGPT Era: Murtadha Muthahhari’s Perspective

Authors

  • Lilik Riandita Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Muliadi Muliadi Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI Sadra) Jakarta
  • Luluk Maktumah Universitas Ibrahimy Sukorejo Situbondo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37680/ssa.10558

Keywords:

digital hermeneutics; religious authority; ChatGPT; artificial intelligence; Murtadha Muthahhari; Islamic epistemology; digital religion

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence has changed how people access, interpret, and evaluate religious information. This article examines the transformation of religious authority in the ChatGPT era through digital hermeneutics and Murtadha Muthahhari’s epistemological perspective. The study uses qualitative library research with an interpretive-philosophical approach. Primary sources are selected works by Muthahhari, while secondary sources address digital religion, algorithmic mediation, large language models, AI ethics, and contemporary debates on religious authority. ChatGPT outputs are treated as secondary interpretive material, not as authoritative religious sources. The analysis finds that AI produces three interconnected shifts: wider access to religious information, more dialogical and personalized interpretation, and a growing risk that fluency and accessibility will be mistaken for authority. From Muthahhari’s perspective, information processing cannot be equated with religious knowledge because reason, revelation, experience, moral responsibility, and spiritual formation are interconnected. ChatGPT can therefore serve as an epistemic and interpretive aid, but not as an autonomous religious authority. The article proposes a human-in-the-loop model of digital religious literacy in which AI supports exploration and learning, while qualified scholars and users remain responsible for verification, contextual interpretation, normative judgment, and ethical consequences.

References

Abror, R. H., Adawiah, R., & Sofia, N. (2024). AI threat and digital disruption: Examining Indonesian ulema in the context of digital culture. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 59–79.

Arifianto, M. L., Thoriquttyas, T., & Izzudin, I. F. (2023). Inquiring Arabic-Islamic Debatable Terms to ChatGPT: Will It Take a Side? Digital Muslim Review, 1(1), 18–35.

Campbell, H. (2007). Who’s got the power? Religious authority and the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 1043–1062.

Campbell, H. (2013). Religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge.

Campbell, H. A., & Cheong, P. H. (2024). The Oxford handbook of digital religion. Oxford University Press.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., & Rossi, F. (2018). AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations: L. Floridi et al. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.

Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method, translation revised by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. Ed. Wahrheit Und Methode. London: Continuum.

Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., & Qin, B. (2025). A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 43(2), 1–55.

Komarudin, D. (2019). Epistemologi dalam pandangan Murtadha Muthahhari. Jurnal Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam (JAQFI), 2(1), 31–54.

Niam, M. F. (2024). Does artificial intelligence go beyond the limits of religious authority? An ethical review on IslamGPT. Al’Adalah, 27(1), 71–84.

Saragih, S. N. (2005). Prinsip-prinsip Epistemologi dalam pemikiran Murtadha Muthahhari. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Shmitchell, S., Bender, E. M., McMillan-Major, A., & Gebru, T. (2024). La era de la inteligencia artificial generativa y la sombra de 1984:¿ puede la tecnología más disruptiva del siglo XXI abrir paso a la concreción de la distopía orwelliana? Derecho, Innovación & Desarrollo Sustentable.

Shormani, M. Q. (2024). Can ChatGPT capture swearing nuances? Evidence from translating Arabic oaths. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2412.02466.

Suhendi, S., Yulianti, F., Isnaini, N. A., Jamal, J., Tamim, A., Wulandari, R., & Ruswandi, U. (2024). The emergence of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in designing Islamic religious education learning. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(02).

Tarwiyyah, H. L. (2025). Kiai-AI: Renegotiating religious authority in the digital age. Journal of Islamic Thought and Philosophy, 4(1), 106–126.

UNESCO. (2021). the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (Issue November).

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Riandita, L., Muliadi, M., & Maktumah, L. (2026). Digital Hermeneutics and Religious Authority in the ChatGPT Era: Murtadha Muthahhari’s Perspective. Social Science Academic, 4(1), 1347–1358. https://doi.org/10.37680/ssa.10558

Issue

Section

Articles