Think, Pair, Share, and Beyond: Cultivating Critical Thinking via Collaborative Learning in Vocational High Schools

Authors

  • Khalid Al Madani Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Nurul Abror Al Robbaniyin, Indonesia
  • Tasya Riskiyanti Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Nurul Abror Al Robbaniyin, Indonesia
  • Putri Nur Kholifatur Rohmah Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Nurul Abror Al Robbaniyin, Indonesia
  • Tasya Madinah Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Nurul Abror Al Robbaniyin, Indonesia
  • Izzatul Fajri Ramadani Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Nurul Abror Al Robbaniyin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37680/ssa.9591

Keywords:

Collaborative Learning; Critical Thinking; Think-Pair-Share; Vocational Education; Classroom Action Research

Abstract

The increasing complexity of modern industrial environments has intensified the need for vocational education institutions to cultivate students’ critical thinking skills alongside technical competence. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of Collaborative Learning through the Think-Pair-Share and Beyond strategy in enhancing students’ critical thinking abilities at SMK Nurul Abror Al Robbaniyin. The research employed a Classroom Action Research design conducted in two cycles consisting of planning, action, observation, and reflection stages. Data were collected through classroom observation, field notes, documentation, and critical thinking assessments focusing on analytical reasoning, evaluation, interpretation, and argumentative communication. The findings revealed a progressive improvement in students’ critical thinking performance and collaborative participation across the research cycles. Students initially demonstrated passive learning behavior and procedural dependence during the pre-cycle stage, but gradually developed stronger analytical engagement, reflective discussion skills, and confidence in communicating technical arguments throughout the intervention process. More substantial improvement emerged during the second cycle following the integration of contextual simulations, visual scaffolding, and guided collaborative reflection within the “Beyond” approach. The study concludes that the modified Think-Pair-Share strategy effectively strengthened critical thinking development and collaborative engagement in vocational classroom learning environments.

References

Adhami, N., & Taghizadeh, M. (2024). Integrating inquiry-based learning and computer supported collaborative learning into flipped classroom: Effects on academic writing performance and perceptions of students of railway engineering. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(3), 521–557. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58837/chula.the.2017.1579

Aggrawal, S., & Magana, A. J. (2024). Teamwork conflict management training and conflict resolution practice via large language models. Future Internet, 16(5), 177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5220/0008520102420245

Aini, K., AR, M. M., & Ridwan, M. (2024). Growing Numeral Literacy Skills through Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics Based on Local Wisdom. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 12(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30539

Amin, S. M., Suhaimi, S. S. A., & Nazuri, N. S. (2024). The present and future of Malaysian technical and vocational education and training (TVET). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(18), 107–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i18/19952

An, S., & Zhang, S. (2024). Effects of ability grouping on students’ collaborative problem solving patterns: Evidence from lag sequence analysis and epistemic network analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4450070

Azizi, F., Wiranda, N., Monnader, N. G., & Morales, U. (2025). Applying the Think-Pair-Share Model to Improve Elementary School Students’ Learning Outcomes. Education Journal, 1(3), 107–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/xn4dw

Barker, R., Hartwell, G., Egan, M., & Lock, K. (2023). The importance of school culture in supporting student mental health in secondary schools. Insights from a qualitative study. British Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 499–521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14217/comsec.1083

Barradas, R., Lencastre, J. A., Soares, S. P., & Valente, A. (2024). Arduino-based mobile robotics for fostering computational thinking development: an empirical study with elementary school students using problem-based learning across Europe. Robotics, 13(11), 159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58809/kpej6842

Boampong, M. S., Boakye-Danquah, J., Boafo, Y. A., Appiagyei, K., Tweneboah-Koduah, D., & Antwi, E. K. (2024). Experiences of inequality in international collaborative research–Perspectives from environmental and sustainability scholars from Ghana, West Africa. Environmental Science & Policy, 152, 103661. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003414490-21

Bordás, A., & Debrenti, E. (2025). University students’ logical thinking in the light of success and perceived difficulty. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(8), 1554–1566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12794/metadc1833563

Budiyanto, K. K., Harapan, E., Purwanto, M. B., & Smaratungga, S. (2024). 21st century English learning: A revolution in skills, critical thinking, creativity, and visual communication. Asian J. Appl. Educ, 3(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvhktj1f.11

Chang, H.-Y., Chang, Y.-J., & Tsai, M.-J. (2024). Strategies and difficulties during students’ construction of data visualizations. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.3051

Chang, L.-C., Lin, H.-R., & Lin, J.-W. (2024). Learning motivation, outcomes, and anxiety in programming courses—A computational thinking–centered method. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 545–569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.909615

Cheng, G., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2024). Exploring differences in self-regulated learning strategy use between high-and low-performing students in introductory programming: An analysis of eye-tracking and retrospective think-aloud data from program comprehension. Computers & Education, 208, 104948. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17760/d20412888

Clark, A., Youssef, M., & Ali, A. (2025). COLLABORATIVE LEARNING IMPROVES EDUCATION: The influence of Think-Pair-Share on improving student learning and critical thinking. NACTA Journal, 69(1). https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v26i4.1684

Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Chen, Z., Wang, L., Zhao, L., Zhu, X., & Xiong, J. (2025). The role of project-based learning with activity theory in teaching effectiveness: Evidence from the internet of things course. Education and Information Technologies, 30(4), 4717–4749. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18535/ijetst/v3i11.06

Fakaruddin, F. J., Shahali, E. H. M., & Saat, R. M. (2024). Creative thinking patterns in primary school students’ hands-on science activities involving robotic as learning tools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.6505

Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4963254

Figueiredo, J., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2024). Design science research applied to difficulties of teaching and learning initial programming. Universal Access in the Information Society, 23(3), 1151–1161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47655/dialog.v43i1.362

Geçikli, M. (2025). Ethical Considerations in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review. Navigating Modern Digital Communication Ethics and Law, 3, 421–451. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1702-1.ch014

Glaister, C., Griggs, V., Martinez Gonzalez, O., & Hussain, M. (2024). Informal collaborative learning (ICL)–student perspectives on the role of informal collaborative learning ICL in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(8), 2025–2041. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59668/2340.26731

Hardiansyah, F., Armadi, A., AR, M. M., & Wardi, M. (2024). Analysis of field dependent and field independent cognitive styles in solving science problems in elementary schools. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(3), 1159–1166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21236/ada463283

Hmoud, H., Al-Adwan, A. S., Horani, O., Yaseen, H., & Al Zoubi, J. Z. (2023). Factors influencing business intelligence adoption by higher education institutions. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 100111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.212.1724

Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., Masri, Y. El, Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., Baird, J., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., Masri, Y. El, Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., Lessons, J. B., Systematic, P. A., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., Masri, Y. El, Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J. (2022). Lessons Learned from PISA : A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment Lessons Learned from PISA : A Systematic Review of Student Assessment. Scandiavian Journal Of Educational Research, 3831. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726

Irmayani, M. I., & Adriana, M. I. (2025). Implementation of the Think-Pair-Share Cooperative Model to Improve Reading Comprehension Skills of Fifth Grade Students at MIN 25 Pidie. Journal of Media and Learning Technology, 1(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v26i4.1641

Jamaludin, R. B., Hamid, A. H. A., & Alias, B. S. (2023). Empowering technical and vocational education and training (TVET). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(12), 3072–3080. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315166568-12

Kodirun, Kadir, Busnawir, & Indrawati, W. O. (2025). Senior high school students’ competence in logical operation and logical reasoning. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1493737. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.2396

Kovari, A. (2025). A systematic review of AI-powered collaborative learning in higher education: Trends and outcomes from the last decade. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5220/0006885303150320

Li, M.-M., & Tu, C.-C. (2024). Developing a project-based learning course model combined with the think–pair–share strategy to enhance creative thinking skills in education students. Education Sciences, 14(3), 233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.10650

Lin, L., Dong, Y., Chen, X., Shadiev, R., Ma, Y., & Zhang, H. (2024). Exploring the impact of design thinking in information technology education: An empirical investigation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v10i2.4096

Lu, H.-P., & Wang, J.-C. (2023). Exploring the effects of sudden institutional coercive pressure on digital transformation in colleges from teachers’ perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 15991–16015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/888934224695

Mariyono, D. (2024). Indonesian mosaic: the essential need for multicultural education. Quality Education for All, 1(1), 301–325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-10-s1-a25

Martin-Alguacil, N., Avedillo, L., Mota-Blanco, R., & Gallego-Agundez, M. (2024). Student-centered learning: Some issues and recommendations for its implementation in a traditional curriculum setting in health sciences. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v10i2.4096

Massitoh, E. I. (2024). Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi rendahnya keterampilan menyimak. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 2, 330–333.

Mesuwini, J., & Mokoena, S. (2024). Exploring Online Teaching and Learning Challenges for the Technical and Vocational Education and Training Lecturer. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 11(1), 193–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58261/xpdk1549

Miller, P. (2024). Anti-racist school leadership: Making ‘race’count in leadership preparation and development. In Leading socially just schools (pp. 9–23). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/888933346863

Nurlaika, F., Sahade, S., & Rijal, A. (2024). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Model Type Think Pair Share (TPS) on Student Learning Outcomes. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 4(2), 641–653. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17977/um065.v6.i3.2026.8

Othman, N. H., Ismail, W. O. A. S. W., Zakaria, N. A. H., Aziz, N. H. M., Hadi, S. N. F. S., & Sobri, S. A. (2026). The Use of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) Strategy to Enhance Year 6 Pupils’ Engagement in Learning Respectful Behaviour toward Teachers. Citra Journal of Innovative Education Practices, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.5438

Ozono, S., Nishi, A., & Miyagi, H. (2025). Turbulence Generated by a Wind Tunnel of Multi-Fan Type in Uniformly-Active and Quasi-Grid Modes. 1–31.

Prabawati, M. N. (2023). Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Strategi Heuristik untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Matematis dan Membangun Karakter Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Disertasi, Univsersitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(4), 6.

Qi, S., & Derakhshan, A. (2025). Technology-based collaborative learning: EFL learners’ social regulation and modifications in their academic emotions and academic performance. Education and Information Technologies, 30(7), 8611–8636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58837/chula.the.2023.376

Rohman, F., & Fuady, A. S. (2026). Renegotiating Academic Integrity in the Age of Generative AI: A Case Study of the “Thinking Partner” Model in High School Learning. EDU-RELIGIA: Jurnal Keagamaan Dan Pembelajarannya, 9(1), 43–53.

Sánchez-García, R., & Reyes-de-Cózar, S. (2025). Enhancing project-based learning: A framework for optimizing structural design and implementation—A systematic review with a sustainable focus. Sustainability, 17(11), 4978. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5353/th_b4490192

Schatzman, L. (2024). Dimensional analysis: Notes on an alternative approach to the grounding of theory in qualitative research. In Social organization and social process (pp. 303–314). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v7n2.p1507-1512

Septiani, D. (2026). IMPROVING STUDENTS’CRITICAL AND COLLABORATIVE THINKING SKILLS THROUGH THE THINK-PAIR-SHARE MODEL IN PANCASILA EDUCATION AT THE FOURTH GRADE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Reseach, 2(2), 146–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.10.2025.12562

Shahzad, T., Mazhar, T., Tariq, M. U., Ahmad, W., Ouahada, K., & Hamam, H. (2025). A comprehensive review of large language models: issues and solutions in learning environments. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.65528/9780807783412-005

Sharma, K., Nguyen, A., & Hong, Y. (2024). Self‐regulation and shared regulation in collaborative learning in adaptive digital learning environments: A systematic review of empirical studies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1398–1436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v26i4.1685

Siller, H.-S., & Ahmad, S. (2024). Analyzing the impact of collaborative learning approach on grade six students’ mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37150/perseda.v7i3.2708

Šinko, S., Navarro, J., Solé-Beteta, X., Zaballos, A., & Gajšek, B. (2024). Challenges that need to be addressed before starting new emergency remote teaching at HEIs and proposed solutions. Sustainability, 16(3), 1144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5353/th_b4004005

Sofiawati, E. T., Cahyadireja, A., Aonudin, A., & Ula, N. N. (2025). Optimizing Social Emotional Learning (SEL) in Elementary School Learning to Strengthen Students’ Character and Psychological Well-Being. Jurnal Iqra’ Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(3).

Sugrah, N. U. (2023). Implementasi teori belajar konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran sains. Humanika, 19(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v19i2.29274

Susilawati, E., Lubis, H., Kesuma, S., Pratama, I., & Khaira, I. (2023). Factors affecting engineering institutes operational efficiency: exploring mediating role of digital technologies adoption In teaching/learning. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 6(1), 252–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18757-0_2

Szymańska, M. (2024). The Teacher Spiritual Development in the Reference to the Metaphorical Understanding of “Education as a Spiritual Journey” by Parker J. Palmer. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education, 13(1 (25)), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.35765/mjse.2024.1325.02

Torres-Peña, R. C., Peña-González, D., Chacuto-López, E., Ariza, E. A., & Vergara, D. (2024). Updating calculus teaching with AI: A classroom experience. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4450070

Ye, J.-H., He, Z., Bai, B., & Wu, Y.-F. (2024). Sustainability of technical and vocational education and training (TVET) along with vocational psychology. In Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 14, Issue 10, p. 859). MDPI. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.123

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Al Madani, K., Riskiyanti, T., Rohmah, P. N. K., Madinah, T., & Ramadani, I. F. (2025). Think, Pair, Share, and Beyond: Cultivating Critical Thinking via Collaborative Learning in Vocational High Schools. Social Science Academic, 3(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.37680/ssa.9591

Issue

Section

Articles