Constitutional Transformation of Indonesian Family Law: A Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Court Decisions on Marriage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v8i2.10863Keywords:
Constitutional Court; Indonesian Family Law; Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ahAbstract
Constitutional adjudication plays an important role in shaping Indonesian family law through the interaction of constitutional principles, state regulations, and religious norms. This study aims to identify and explain distinct patterns of constitutional transformation through a comparative analysis of Constitutional Court Decisions Nos. 22/PUU-XV/2017, 46/PUU-VIII/2010, and 24/PUU-XX/2022. Employing normative juridical research with statutory and case approaches, the study applies qualitative comparative and deductive analysis across five dimensions: constitutional issues, statutory provisions, judicial reasoning, operative rulings, and normative consequences. The findings reveal three patterns of transformation: reconstructive transformation, represented by the reform of minimum marriage-age regulation; expansive transformation, reflected in the extension of civil-law protection to children born outside marriage; and preservative transformation, demonstrated by the maintenance of the religious basis of marital validity in interfaith marriage. These patterns show that constitutional intervention does not follow a uniform trajectory but varies according to the legal issues and the Court's reasoning. The study proposes differentiated constitutional transformation as a context-specific analytical framework, with maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah serving as a normative instrument for evaluating legal consequences and legal pluralism providing the contextual perspective for understanding the interaction between constitutional and religious norms.
References
Anindyajati, T. (2021). Improving the Protection of Children’s Constitutional Rights Through Constitutional Court Decision. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia, 23. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.29-6-2021.2312659
Chotidjah, N. (2025). Islamic Constitutionalism and Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Dynamics of Qanun, Pancasila, and Human Rights from the Old Order to the Reform. Lentera Hukum, 12(3), 409–455. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v12i3.53694
Faridah, H., Mustahal, M., & Fathudin. (2026). Pengesahan Anak Zina Menurut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syariah. Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.46773/aqvsdf30
H. Abid, Edi Rohaedi, N. K. (2022). Kedudukan Anak Luar Kawin Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Palar (Pakuan Law Review), 08(46), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v8i4
Hadiati, M., & Ramadhan, F. (2022). Observing the Differences in Constitutional Court Decisions about the Legal Age of Marriage. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(3), 643–672. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1937
Handini, W. P. (2019). Hak Konstitusional Anak di Luar Perkawinan Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 8(5), 55. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v16i1.455
Hanum, C. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum atas Hak Anak Melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Meta Yuridis, 2(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v2i1.3520
Hermanto, Y. R. (2024). Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif, Hukum Islam dan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia. Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization, 12(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.20961/jolsic.v12i1.85113
Ibnudin, S., Achmad Kholiq, A. A., A. Y. (2025). Reconstruction of Interfaith Marriage Law in Indonesia: Relevance of Sociology Knowledge and Maqasid Sharia. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 25(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v25i1.1819
Ilhami, H. (2020). Relevansi Putusan Mahkamah dalam Upaya Mencegah Perkawinan Usia Anak the Relevance of Constitutional XV / 2017 Related to the Dispensation of Marriage to Prevent Child Age Marriage. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(2), 284–308. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1723
Iqbal, R. (2025). Pendekatan Maqasid as-Syari’ah terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia: Menyelaraskan Prinsip Kebebasan dan Kemanusiaan. Jilaw: Jurnal Islamic Law and Wisdom, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.30983/jilaw.v1i2.10238
Islamiyati, I. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Nikah Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(3), 243. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.3.2016.243-251
Istiqomah, J. N. (2025). Kedudukan Anak di Luar Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Jurnal Al Wasith: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, 10(2), 430–443. https://doi.org/10.52802/wst.v10i2.1846
Judiasih, S. D., Lestari, P. W., & Nugroho, B. D. (2024). Kedudukan Waris Anak Luar Kawin yang tidak Diakui sebagai Anak Sah oleh Ayah Biologis Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Acta Diurnal: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 7(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v7i2.1663
Kasmiati. (2021). Telaah Maqasid Syariah Terhadap Putusan MK No. 22/PUU-XV/2017 Tentang Batas Usia Nikah. Al-Syakhshiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan, 32(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.35673/as.v1i1.210
Lestari, P. W., Judiasih, S. D., & Nugroho, B. D. (2023). Inheritance Rights of Extramarital Children after the Constitutional Court Decision of 2010. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v6i1.19655
Manaf, A. (2019). The Importance of Increasing Minimum Age for Marriage in Indonesian Marriage Law *. AL-‘ADALAH, 16(2), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v16i2.4546
Mardiana, L., Anggrek, S., & Djimat, A. P. (2020). Eksistensi Putusan MK Nomor 46/PUU/VIII/ 2010 dan Putusan MK Nomor 69/PUU/XIII/2015 Setelah Adanya Undang-Undang tentang Perkawinan Terbaru. Notaire, 3(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v3i1.16763
Mauliana, S., & Hanapi, A. (2023). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 24/Puu-Xx/2022 tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama. Usroh: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 7(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.19109/ujhki.v7i2.20235
Miichi, K. (2025). Feminist Strategies in a Muslim Democracy: Case Study of the 2019 Marriage Law Revision in Indonesia. Contemporary Islam, 19, 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-025-00599-8
Noval, C., & Santiago, F. (2025). Legal Implications of Proving the Status of Non-Marital Children through DNA Tests in the Indonesian Civil Law System. JGSP: Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik, 3(2), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.38035/jgsp.v3i2
Nugroho, I. Y., Syafi’i, I., Wagianto, R., Hikmiyah, H. H., & Rouf, A. (2026). Judicial Gatekeeping and Multi-Stakeholder Governance in Preventing Child Marriage: An Analysis Through the Lens of Sadd Al-Dzari’ah. Asian Journal of Human Services, 30(4), e3004.1.007. https://doi.org/10.14391/ajhs.e3004.1.007
Parwoto. (2026). Ban on Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: An Analysis of Constitutionality in the Perspective of Islamic Law and Human Rights. Al Hairy: Islamic Law, 2(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.64344/hry.v2i1.102
Purnomo, A., Salam, N., Zamzami, M., & Bakar, A. (2023). Dimensions of Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘ah and Human Rights in the Constitutional Court’s Decision on Marriage Age Difference in Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 7(3), 1397–1421. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i3.13283
Pusvita, S. (2018). Keperdataan Anak Diluar Nikah dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya terhadap Harta Warisan. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam, 1(2), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.30659/jua.v1i2.2338
Putri, W. K. S. (2022). Akibat Hukum Pengakuan Anak Luar Kawin Setelah Berlakunya Putusan MK Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Akta Notaris, 1(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.56444/aktanotaris.v1i1.195
Rosa, M., Huda, Y., Danil, M., Maulidah, C., & Arlis, A. (2024). The Reforming of Marriage Law through Constitutional Court Decision in Indonesia: Reformasi Undang-Undang Perkawinan Melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 21(4), 656–679. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2148
Roslaili, Y. (2021). Family law reform in Indonesia from a Maqashid al-shari'a perspective (A case study of Law No. 16 of 2019). Gender Equality: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies, 7(16), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.22373/equality.v7i2.9397
Sania, Y., Simabura, C., & Andriani, H. (2024). Politik Hukum Batas Minimum Usia Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017. Lareh Law Review, 2(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.25077/llr.2.1.58-72.2024
Sanjaya, U. H. (2023). Interpretation of Interfaith and/or Belief Marriage by Judges: Disparity and Legal Vacuum. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(3), 536–555. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2039
Sanmas, D. A. S. A. A., Uktolseja, N., & Labetubun, M. A. H. (2025). The Effect of the Constitutional Court Decision Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 On The Inheritance Rights of out-of-Wedlock Children in Islamic Inheritance Law. Lutur Law Journal, 6(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.30598/lutur.v6i1.22890
Saputra, D. A. (2025). The Lineage Status of Children Born Out of Wedlock: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic Jurisprudence and Indonesian Law. Setyaki: Jurnal Studi Keagamaan Islam, 3(3), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.59966/setyaki.v3i3.2116
Sautunnida, L. (2020). The Normative Analysis of Marriage Age After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 22 / PUU-XV / 2017. Atlantis Press, 413(22), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200306.190
Septarini, R. (2019). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/Puu-Xv/2017 tentang Batas Usia Nikah bagi Perempuan. Jurnal Ulumul Syar’i, 8(1), 5--68. https://doi.org/10.52051/ulumulsyari.v8i1.41
Shandana, I. N. (2024). Maqashid Syariah Perspektif Imam Asy-Syathibi dan Jasser Auda. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal (MIJ), 2(1), 397–405. https://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/article/view/4551
Sidqi, I. (2023). Prohibition of Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia : A Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 24 / PUU-XX / 2022. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 21(1), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v21i1.2337
Sisilia. (2025). Juridical Review of the Inheritance Rights of Children Without Formal Status: An Analysis of the Constitutional Court’s Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 in Child Protection Efforts. Pena Justicia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 24(1), 3413–3431. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6370
Suryantoro, D. D., & Mansur, A. (2026). Tinjauan Maqasid al-Syari’ah terhadap Batas Usia Perkawinan dalam Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan Indonesia. Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 7(1), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.46773/e9zacz90
Taqiuddin, H. U., & Martadinata, Y. (2026). Constitutional Protection of Children Born Out of Wedlock: Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Human Rights et Justicia, 2(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.70742/hrj.v2i1.1047
Umah, B. M. (2026). Epistemological Analysis, Classical Literature, and the Integration of Siyasah Dusturiyah Methodology to Modern Constitutional Governance. Al-’Adalah: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Islam, 11(1), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.31538/adlh.v11i1.10559
Widjaja, A. H. (2021). Interfaith Marriage and the Legal Consequence of its Validity. ICILS, 3(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.1-7-2020.2303608
Yasniwati, Fitri, D., Rosa, M., Y., D., & Hardianto, A. (2026). When Courts Permit Child Marriage: Judicial Discretion and the Limits of Child Protection in Indonesia. Usraty: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 4(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.30983/usraty.v4i1.11285
Yohanes, J., & Djaja, B. (2024). Antinomy of Biological Father’s Liability to out-of-Marriage Children in Notary Deed. Jurnal Konstitusi, 21(1), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2118
Zahira, V. A. (2025). Analisis Kritis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010: Hubungan Nasab dan Keperdataan Anak di Luar Nikah dalam Perspektif Maslahah. Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik, 2(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v2i2.878
Zaldi, & Tanjung, D. (2023). Perkawinan Campuran dalam Hukum Positif dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, 3(3), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.36312/jcm.v3i3.1358
Republik Indonesia. (1974). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Republik Indonesia. (2019). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Republik Indonesia.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2012). Putusan Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. https://s.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_sidang_46 PUU 2010
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2018). Putusan Nomor 22/{PUU-XV}/2017 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. https://www.mkri.id/perkara/persidangan/putusan?search=22%5C%2FPUU-XV%5C%2F2017
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2023). Putusan Perkara Nomor 24/PUU-XX/2022. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_mkri_8844_1675141891.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sharhan Asad Almawarid, Rodi Wahyudi, Zul Ikromi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








