Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase dalam Kaitannya dengan Prinsip Final and Binding
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Arbitration is an alternative effort to resolve disputes outside the court whose decisions are final and have permanent legal force that binds the parties (final and binding). However, the Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Law, namely Law Number 30 of 1999, also regulates efforts to annul the arbitration award which has legal consequences for the disputing parties. This paper is a descriptive normative legal research. The types of data used are secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. This paper discusses the legal consequences of annulment of arbitral awards which are related to the principle of Final and Binding of Arbitral Awards. This paper is descriptive in that it describes the general description of the annulment of the Arbitration Award, then describes the Final and Binding Principles in the Arbitration Award. As well as matters relating to the annulment of the arbitral award and its legal consequences. In this paper, the author concludes that the legal consequences of the annulment of the arbitration award by the District Court are that the arbitral award is considered to have never existed. In addition, with the cancellation of the arbitral award in Law Number 30 of 1999, it gives a vague meaning to the principle of final and binding which in reality the losing parties or feel that their interests are not accommodated in the arbitral award makes the decision not final and binding due to an attempt to cancel the arbitral award
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Balai Pustaka.
Fuady, M. (2000). Arbitrase Nasional. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Kadir, M. A. (1992). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (Cetakan V). Citra Aditya Bakti.
Kurniawan, Michael Jordi, P. M. R. (2016). Implikasi Yuridis Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase di Indonesia (Studi Putusan Nomor:305/Pdt.G/Bani/2014/Pn.Jkt.Utr). Verstek, 4(3), 119–127.
Mappong, Z. (2010). Eksekusi Putusan Serta Merta (Proses Gugatan Dan Cara Membuat Putusan Serta Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Dalam Perkara Perdata,. Tunggal Mandiri Publishing.
Nazriyah, T. A. dan R. (2017). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase oleh Pengadilan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi The Nullifying of Arbitral Decision by Court in the Constitutional Court. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(4).
Priyatna, A. (2002). Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) Suatu Pengantar. Fikahati Aneska.
Raymond, H. (2021). Problematika Final dan Mengikat Putusan Arbitrase dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.51825/sjp.v1i2.12672
Redfern, A. & M. H. (1987). Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. (Third Sect).
Situmorang, M. (2020). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(4), 573. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.573-586
Siwi W. Yuyut.dkk. (2021). Permohonan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Ditinjau dari Pasal 70 Undang- Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif dan Penyelesaian Sengketa (Analisis Putusan No.4/Pdt.Sus-Arb/2020/PN.Bna). Jurnal Lex Spesialis, 1(1), 69–75.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. UI Press.
Soeroso, R. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Subekti, R. (1992). Arbitrase dan Perdagangan. Bina Cipta.
Suparman, E. (2012). Arbitrase & Dilema Penegakkan Keadilan,. Fikahati Aneska.
Sutiarso, C. (2011). Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Dalam Sengketa Bisnis. Obor Indonesia.
Umar, M. H. (2017). Undang-Undang Arbitrase Indonesia Perlu Perubahan. Indonesia Arbitration Quarterly Newsletter, 9 No.3.
Undang-Undang, P. R. I. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. In UU No 30 1999 (pp. 41–51).
Widjaja, G. (2008). Arbitrase Vs Pengadilan: Persoalan Kompetensi (Absolut) yang tidak Pernah Selesai,. Kencana.
Yuhelson. (2018). Hukum Arbitrase. CV.Arti Bumi Intaran.