Kedudukan Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan di Indonesia
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The purpose of law itself includes three values, namely, the value of justice, expediency, and legal certainty. But unfortunately, actual practice in the world of law often does not emphasize all values and tends to forget one importance. Therefore, an understanding has arisen that justice is the most critical value in direction. The purpose of this paper is to find out the concept of justice in the rule of law in Indonesia and describe the position of law that can create an ideal legal system in Indonesia so that the context of the welfare State Can Be Realized. The research method used is a descriptive analysis which leads to normative juridical research, namely research conducted by referring to legal norms, namely examining library materials or secondary materials. Secondary data by processing data from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The role of the law in realizing people's welfare must be seen in the fabric of the law in the moral integrity of law enforcement officials.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Isno.2016 Kedudukan dan Sistematika Filsafat Ilmu dalam Rasionalisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan. TA’DIBIA Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Agama Islam Vol. 6 No. 2 Nop 2016
Laurensius Arliman S,2016. “Partisipasi Masyarakat di dalam Perlindungan Anak yang Berkelanjutan Sebagai Bentuk Kesadaran Hukum”,Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 3, Nomor 2, 2016.
Handayani, Johannes, Kiki. 2018. Peranan Filsafat Hukum Dalam Mewuudkan Keadilan. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni Vol. 2, No. 2, Oktober 2018
Mahir Amin.2014. Konsep Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Islam . Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam Volume 4, Nomor 2, Oktober 2014
Muhammad Helmi.2015. Konsep Keadilan Dalam Filsafat Hukum dan Dalam Filsafat Hukum Islam . Mazahib, Vol. XIV, No. 2 (Desember 2015
Suwardi Sagama. 2016. Analisis Konsep Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum dan Kemamfaatan dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan. Mazahib,Vol XV, No. 1 (Juni 2016)
Sudjito, “Critical Legas Studies(CSL) dan Hukum Progresif Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Reformasi Hukum Nasional dan Perubahan Kurikulum Pendidikan Hukum”, Jurnal Ultimatum, Edisi II,2008, hlm. 3.
Zakki Adlhiyati, Achmad. Melacak Keadilan dalam Regulasi Poligami: Kajian Filsafat Keadilan Aristoteles, Thomas Aquinas, dan John Rawls. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 2 (2019)
Abdul latif dan Hasbi Ali,Politik Hukum,Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2011,hlm. 15
Achmad Ali, Menguak Tabir Hukum, Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis, Gunung Agung, Jakarta,2012, hlm.40
Ansori, Abdul Gafur, 2006, Filsafat Hukum Sejarah, Aliran Dan Pemaknaan, Gajah Mada Universisty Press, Yogyakarta
Asep Warlan Yusup, Memuliakan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan Dalam Alam Demokrasi Yang Berkeadilan (Dalam Butir-Butir Pemikiran Dalam Hukum; Memperingati 70 tahun Prof.Dr. Arief Sidharta, SH), Bandung, Refika Aditama, 2008, hlm. 222
Bernard L Tanya dkk, Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi, Genta Publising, Yogyakarta, 2013, hlm.117.
Carl Joachim Friedrich, Filsafat Hukum : Perspektif Historis, (Bandung: Nuansa dan Busamedis, 2004). h. 239. Dwisvimiar, “Keadilan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu Hukum”, hlm. 528.
F Isjwara,Pengantar Ilmu Politik, cetakan kesembilan, Bandung, Putra Abardin, 1999, hlm.80
Fuady, Munir Fuady, 2010, Dinamika Teori Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Ciawi-Bogor,
Garvey, James, 2010, 20 Karya Filsafat Terbesar, Penerbit Kanisius, Yogyakarta
Harold J. Laski,Authority in the Modern State, Canada,Yale University Press, 2000, hlm.
Muhammad, “Teori Keadian John Rawls”, hlm. 141.
Muhammad Muslehuddin, Philosophy of Islamic Law and the Orientalists, (Delhi: Markaz Maktabah Islamiyah, 1985), 42.
Moh. Mahfud MD, Penegakan Hukum DanTata Kelola Pemerintahan Yang Baik, Bahan pada Acara Seminar Nasional “Saatnya Hati Nurani Bicara” yang diselenggarakan oleh DPP Partai HANURA, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 8 Januari 2009
Nurtjahjo, Hendra. Ilmu Negara (Pengembangan Teori Bernegara Dan Suplemen), Cet. 1. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005
Padmo Wahjono, SH., '·Kuliah - Kuliah llmu Negara", eel. I, (Jakarta: Indo Hill, 1966), hal. 260.
Md, M. (2009). Capaian Dan Proyeksi Kondisi Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 16(3), 291–310.
Satjipto Rahardjo. Ilmu Hukum, Editor Awaludin Marwan, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2012, hlm.20
Suparmono, Rudi, Peran Serta Hakim Dalam Pembelajaran Hukum, Varia Peradilan edisi Mei 2006 Sunaryo, “Amartya Sen tentang Teori Keadilan John Rawls: Kritik Pendekatan Komparatif atas Pendekatan Institusionalisme”, Respons, 23, 1 (2018), hlm. 11.
Yovita A. Mangesti & Bernard L. Tanya, Moralitas Hukum, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing. 2014, hlm. 74.
Angkasa, 2010, Filsafat Hukum ( Materi Kuliah ), Magister Ilmu Hukum Hukum UNSOED, Perwokerto, hal.106-
Dardji Darmohardjo, Shidarta., Pokok-pokok filsafat hukum: apa dan bagaimana filsafat
hukum Indonesia, (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2006) h.155.
Umar Falahul Alam, (2013), pemikiran filsafat “teori kritis ” jürgen habermas http://valahulalam. blog. walisongo. ac. id/2013/12/07/pemikiran-filsafat-teorikritis-jurgen-habermas/ diakses tanggal 6 Desember 2021.
http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancasila#Sila_ kedua, diakses, 10 Nopember 2014.
https://unpar.ac.id/solusi-permasalahan-hukum-indonesia-jaksa-agung-bahas-keadilan-restoratif/