Kajian Hukum Penerapan Ketentuan Hukuman Mati dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Corruption is categorized as an extraordinary crime where the impact can be very detrimental to the country and can even have a very bad impact on the economy and development of the country. Efforts to deal with and eradicate criminal acts of corruption as meant in Law Number 31 of 1999 which has been amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, put forward several important points and main ideas and are considered capable of providing a deterrent effect against the perpetrators of this extraordinary crime, namely the principle of reversed proof and severe legal sanctions, including the death penalty. This research is a normative legal research. The main characteristics of normative legal science research in conducting legal studies are primary and secondary legal materials, using interpretation methods, and using normative juridical analysis. The result of this research is that the regulation on capital punishment in the PTPK Law is stated in Article 2 paragraph (2) which formulates "in the event that a criminal act of corruption as referred to in paragraph (1) is committed in certain circumstances the death penalty can be imposed". The specific situation in question is a situation that can be used as a reason for criminal aggravation for perpetrators of corruption, namely if the crime is committed against funds earmarked for overcoming a dangerous situation. Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution formulates that: "Indonesia is a state based on law". The consequence of a rule of law is the protection of human rights, including the right to life. Thus, the imposition of death penalty for corruptors who have been hampered by human rights issues, especially the right to life can be upheld.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Andi Hamzah, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta Rineka Cipta, 2001.
Amiruddin, Asikin, Zainal. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
Atmasasmita, Romli. Arah Pembangunan Hukum di Indonesia, dalam Komisi Yudisial dan Keadilan Sosial. Komisi Yudisial. 2008
Barda Nawawi Arief. Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana, Alumni Bandung, 1992
Chaeruddin DKK. Strategi Pencegahan dan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi. PT Refika Aditama. Bandung. 2008.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Memahami Untuk Membasmi. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jakarta. 2006.
Marzuki, C. V. S., Pasalbessy, J. D., & Patty, J. M. (2021). Aspek Melawan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Perbuatan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Penyaluran Bantuan Sosial Di Masa PSBB. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(7), 672-678.
Muladi. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang, 1995.
Soerjono Soekamto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2010
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar 1945
Indonesia.Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 jo UU No. 31/1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Indonesia. Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Indonesia. Undang-Undang No 30 tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Pane, A. A., & Putriana, M. (2013, April). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi. In National Conference (Vol. 2, p. 119).
Taun, T., & Nugraha, A. (2020). Penerapan Hukum dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja dan Kebijakan Bank Terhadap Debitur yang Terdampak Pandemi Covid-19. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 24-32.
Virginia, E. F., & Soponyono, E. (2021). Pembaharuan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perpajakan. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(3), 299-311.
Yuhermansyah, E., & Fariza, Z. (2017). Pidana Mati dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Kajian Teori Zawajir dan Jawabir. LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum, 6(1), 156-174.