The Application of Restorative Justice in Civil Dispute Resolution: Potentials and Challenges in Indonesia

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abdul Halim

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assist the community in handling cases. Settlement of civil disputes can be carried out through a trial process in court. The research method uses a descriptive qualitative research approach, namely research on natural objects from experiments. with observational data collection techniques, interviews. The results of the research description of the application of Restorative Justice in Indonesia are still limited and face various challenges, such as a lack of public understanding of the concept of Restorative Justice, limited resources, and a lack of support and coordination between institutions. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the possibilities and obstacles involved in integrating restorative justice approaches into the civil justice system in Indonesia. Recognized by society and the judiciary. There are challenges in the implementation of restorative justice, such as the lack of trained human resources and adequate facilities, so that improvements and development are needed so that restorative justice can be implemented properly.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Halim, A. (2023). The Application of Restorative Justice in Civil Dispute Resolution: Potentials and Challenges in Indonesia. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 883-890. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2729

References

Adriyansah, Ade. (2018). Kedudukan Hukum Putusan No. 200/PDT. G/2008/PN. SMG Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepemilikan Tanah Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 3(1), 1–14.
Caiza Chacha, Franklin Orlando, & Sasig Silva, Erika Liliana. (2022). Desarrollo de una aplicación web y móvil de realidad aumentada para el museo de la Casa de los Marqueses de Miraflores de la ciudad de Latacunga. Ecuador: Latacunga: Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi (UTC).
Fitria, Raissa Anita. (2017). Penyadapan Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Umum Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Pidana. Mimbar Keadilan, 160–182.
Hermanus, Widio Jeremi Ismail. (2022). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PEMECAH OMBAK DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINGGI MANADO NOMOR: 9/PIDANA KHUSUS 2018 PT. MANADO. LEX ADMINISTRATUM, 10(1).
Iqbal, Muhamad. (2018). Implementasi Efektifitas Asas Oportunitas di Indonesia Dengan Landasan Kepentingan Umum. Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu: Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(1), 87–100.
Kansil, Fernando I. (2014). Sanksi Pidana dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Menurut KUHP dan di Luar KUHP. Lex Crimen, 3(3).
Nurhayati, Siti, & Fadhillah, Muhammad Haris. (2022). Menakar Peluang Dan Tantangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Fintech Syariah Melalui Laps. Jurnal Tabarru’: Islamic Banking and Finance, 5(1), 63–70.
O’Toole, John, Bagshaw, Dale, Burton, Bruce, Grünbaum, Anita, Lepp, Margret, Morrison, Morag, Pillai, Janet, O’Toole, John, Bagshaw, Dale, & Burton, Bruce. (2019). Conflict Management, Resolution and Transformation. Researching Conflict, Drama and Learning: The International DRACON Project, 13–42.
Ouellet, Marie, Hashimi, Sadaf, Gravel, Jason, & Papachristos, Andrew V. (2019). Network exposure and excessive use of force: Investigating the social transmission of police misconduct. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(3), 675–704.
Pardede, Josua Navirio, & Santoso, Wahyu Yun. (n.d.). Refleksi Kritis Terhadap Konsep Keadilan Restoratif dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia.
Saad, G. de A., Léda, P. H. de O., de Sá, I. M., & Seixlack, A. C. de C. (2016). Contemporary herbal medicine-tradition and science in clinical practice. Contemporary Herbal Medicine-Tradition and Science in Clinical Practice., (Ed. 2).
Salloch, Sabine, Vollmann, Jochen, & Schildmann, Jan. (2014). Ethics by opinion poll? The functions of attitudes research for normative deliberations in medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(9), 597–602.
Sarbini, Ilyas, & Ma’arij, Aman. (2020). Restorative Justice Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana. Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 9(1), 31–42.
Scholl, Mark B., & Townsend, Christopher B. (2023). Restorative justice: A humanistic paradigm for addressing the needs of victims, offenders, and communities. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling.
Suyono, Yoyok Ucuk. (2020). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan diluar Peradilan Sebagai Upaya Pencapaian Rasa Keadilan. Jatiswara, 35(3).
Wagiu, Justisi Devli, Maramis, Ronny A., Anis, Friend H., Setlight, Mercy Maria Magdalena, & Soeikromo, Deasy. (2022). PENERAPAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF (RESTORATIVE JUSTICE) DALAM PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA PERBANKAN BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA YANG MERUGIKAN KEUANGAN NEGARA. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 9(10), 4065–4087.
Yunus, Karaeng M. Marwa, & Hasan, K. N. Sofyan. (2023). KEBIJAKAN LEGISLASI MEDIASI PENAL SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA DI BIDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN. Lex LATA, 5(1).