Optimization of the Imposition of Additional Compensation Penalties for Corruption Crimes that Harm State Finances Due to the Alternative Choice of Imprisonment as a Substitute (Study of Decision Execution in North Maluku in 2021)
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the optimization and effectiveness of imposing additional fines as a substitute for imprisonment in relation to the execution of judgments in North Maluku in 2021, specifically focusing on corruption offenses that harm the state finances. The study employs an empirical legal research approach, utilizing empirical data obtained from interviews and direct observations of human behavior. Three approaches are utilized in this research: legal, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The research findings indicate that the imposition of additional fines as a substitute for imprisonment in corruption cases that harm state finances is still not optimal. Out of the seven cases examined, only two cases resulted in the restitution of the state's financial losses. Furthermore, the research highlights the failure to achieve legal effectiveness due to the insufficient restitution of state financial losses resulting from the availability of the alternative option of imprisonment as a substitute for the additional fines.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Burhanuddin. (2020). Eksistensi Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila (BPIP) Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. JURIDICA: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani, 2(1), 57. https://juridica.ugr.ac.id/index.php/juridica/article/view/181
Diding Rahmat. (2020). Formulasi Kebijakan Pidana Denda Dan Uang Pengganti Dalam Penegakan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 8(1). https://www.jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/686
Fajar, N. M., & Achmad, Y. (2015). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Pustaka Belajar.
Febriani, S., & Lasmadi, S. (2020). Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Melalui Pembayaran Uang Pengganti. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(1). https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/Pampas/article/view/8277
Guntari, T. E., & Rizanizarli. (2017). Penerapan Uang Pengganti sebagai Pidana Tambahan terhadap Terpidana Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana, 1(2). https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1234638
Mulatua, S., & Nggeboe, F. (2017). Efektifitas Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 9(1). http://legalitas.unbari.ac.id/index.php/Legalitas/article/view/142
Mulyadi, L. (2011). Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia: Normatif, Teoretis, Praktik, dan Masalahnya. PT. Alumni.
Musatajab, Y., & Tajuddin, M. A. (2018). Uang Pengganti Sebagai Alternatif Pengembalian Kerugian Negara dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Restorative Justice, 2(1). https://www.ejournal.unmus.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/1924
Pasmatuti, D. (2019). Perkembangan Pengertian Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Ensiklopedia Social Review, 1(1). https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/2658403
Putri, N. R. (2018). Penjatuhan Pidana Uang Pengganti Sebagai Pidana Tambahan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 6(1). https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/929223
Rahma Noviyanti. (2019). Penerapan Perma Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Nagari Law Review, 2(2). https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/984263
Sidabutar, L. M. J. (2019). Hukum Kepailitan dalam Eksekusi Harta Benda Korporasi sebagai Pembayaran Uang Pengganti. INTEGRITAS, 5(2). https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/474
Tira, A. I., & Jafar, J. M. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Utang Debitur Dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jurnal Clavia, 20(1), 71.
Yusuf, M. (2018). Eksekusi Terhadap Pidana Tambahan Berupa Uang Pengganti Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Kejaksaan Negeri Padang (Studi Putusan Nomor: 19/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2015/Pn Pdg). Unes Law Review, 1(1). https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/895112