Desain Lembaga Peradilan Sengketa Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Indonesia Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Demokrasi dan Keadilan Konstitutional

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 26, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Tri Susilo
STISIP Bina Marta

Abstract

The implementation of direct regional head elections has been going on for two decades. The problem so far is the dispute resolution institution, until now the regional head election dispute settlement in Indonesia is still divided into several institutions such as the General Election Supervisory Board, the State Administrative Court, the District Court, and the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Court, each court has its own procedures, causing miscoordination and overlapping of powers. This article aims to find out the design of regional head election dispute justice institutions in Indonesia to realize democratic justice and constitutional justice. This research is a normative legal research with a statutory, analytical, and case approach that aims to find out the background of the idea of establishing a special court for regional head elections in Indonesia to realize democratic and constitutional justice. The settlement of post-conflict local election disputes in Indonesia is the antithesis of the weaknesses and problems in resolving regional head election disputes, which have been going on for two decades, namely: disputes over the settlement of election processes and results by several judicial institutions. This is to provide the best as an alternative special court for the resolution of regional election disputes in the future. This research resulted in the finding that the regional head general election judiciary is something that must be considered in the Indonesian constitutional system, which institutionally will be equivalent to the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, nominally it is also something new, namely called the General Election Court. This institution simplifies the dispute resolution process for regional head elections and general elections to realize constitutional justice

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright:

An author who publishes in Al-Manhaj agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

License:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Susilo, T. (2023). Desain Lembaga Peradilan Sengketa Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Indonesia Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Demokrasi dan Keadilan Konstitutional. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 899-906. Retrieved from https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/almanhaj/article/view/2844

References

Dahlan Thaib, Jazim Hamidi, dan Ni'matul Huda, (2013). Teori dan Hukum Konstitusi, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Dimana. KC (1975). Konstitusi Modern, Kesan Ketiga, Oxford University Press.
Golfrod, Dennis J. (2005). Konstitusi Amerika dan Debat Tentang Originalisme, New York: Csmbridge University Press.
Internasional Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, (2010). Keadilan Pemilu, Ringkasan Buku Acuan International IDEA, Indonesia Printer, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Kelsen, Hans. (1992). Pengantar Masalah Teori Hukum, diterjemahkan oleh Bonnie Litschewski Paulson dan Stanley L. Paulson, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Krippendoff, Klaus. (1993). Analisis Isi, Pengantar Teori dan Metodologi, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Magaisa, Alex, (2011). Konstitusionalitas versus Konstitusionalisme: Pelajaran untuk proses reformasi konstitusional Zimbabwe. (2011) Jurnal OPENSPACE (KAR id: 30495 )
Nasrullah, N., & Lailam, T. (2017). Dinamika dan Problematika Politik Hukum Lembaga Penyelesai Sengketa Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 24(1), 1-13.
Raws, John. (1971). teori keadilanthe belknap press of harvard university press cambridge, massachusetts london, inggris.
Reinenda, V. (2021). MENAKAR RELEVANSI PEMBENTUKAN BADAN PERADILAN KHUSUS PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HASIL PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH TAHUN 2024. Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau, 3(2), 1-21.
Setiyawan, D. B. (2019). Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Al-Balad: Journal of Constitutional Law, 1(1).
Soekamto, Soejono. Mamuji, Sri. (2006). Penelitian hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjau Singkat, Raharja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.