Tinjauan Hukum Pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas Atas Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Sesuai dengan Aturan Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Salsabila Putri Paramadani

Abstract

The dissolution of a limited liability company is also very dependent on the actions of the GMS which is the highest organ in a limited liability company in making company decisions that will determine the directors in taking the direction of company policy in dissolving the company, this is because the directors are still bound and bear legal consequences if the mechanism for dissolving the company is carried out in an incorrect manner and violates the provisions of the law. The problem in this study is related to the company that does not have assets at the time of dissolution and compared with the legal rules of dissolution of the company in Indonesia with those in Malaysia. The method in this research is normative juridical. The results of this study indicate that there are some similarities and differences in the process of dissolution of a limited liability company according to legal provisions in Indonesia and Malaysia which are ASEAN countries, this is because the legal system used by Indonesia adheres to the civil law legal system, while Malaysia is common law.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Paramadani, S. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas Atas Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Sesuai dengan Aturan Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 1025-1034. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2874

References

Abdul R. Saliman. (2010). Hukum Bisnis nutuk Perusahaan. 105.
Dewi Oktavia, & Irene Svinarky. (2021). , Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Surat Pernyataan Setor Modal Sebagai Pengganti Bukti Setor Modal Dalam Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Di Indonesia. Jurnal Gagasan Hukum Universitas Putera Batam, 63–64.
Erman Rajagukguk. (2007). Pengelolaan Perusahaan Yang baik: Tangoing Jawab Pemegang Saham, Komisaris, dan direksiyon. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 26(3), 225–227.
Frans Satrio Wicaksono. (2009). Tanggungjawab Pemegang Saham, Direksi dan Komisari Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Vismedia.
Gunawan Widjaja. (2006a). Seri Aspek Hukum Bisnis.
Gunawan Widjaja. (2006b). Seri Aspek Hukum Dalam Bisnis. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Harijan Rusli. (2003). Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia.
Ida Bagus Putra Pratama, & Made Dedy Priyanto. (n.d.). Kepastian Hukum Modal Dasar Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Perubahan Modal Dasar Perseroan Terbatas. Bali: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana.
Kansil. (1996). Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia.
M. Yahya Harahap. (2001). Hukum perseroan Terbatas.
Mahmud Marzuki, P. (2011). Penelitian Hukum, . Kencana.
Purba Orinton. (2022). Petunjuk Praktis bagi Rups Komisaris dan Perseroan Terbatas agar Terhindar dari jerat hukum. jakarta: rain asa sudses.
Ridwan khairandy. (2009). Perseroan Terbatas, Dokrtrin, Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan Yurisprudensi,.
Sri Mamudji. (2005). Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum. Jakarta : Badań Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007tentang Perseroan Terbatas, L.N. Tahun 2007 Nomor 106, TLN 4756, Ps. 1 ayat (1).
Yan Pramadya Puspa. (2008). kamus Hukum edişi lengkap Bahasa belanda. semarang: aneka ilmu.