Kedudukan Penyidik Kepolisian Terhadap Kewenangannya Menangani Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Menurut Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This paper focuses on the role and challenges of Polri investigators in the Indonesian criminal justice system, particularly in handling cases of corruption and abuse of power. The purpose of this research is to examine the position of Polri investigators in their authority to handle the case and to identify the obstacles they face. The normative juridical research method used in this research uses primary and secondary data. The results of the study show that the position of Polri investigators is based on the concept of values or basic ideas for the establishment of the Criminal Procedure Code which requires conducting professional investigations and meeting the demands of the general court. This position is regulated in Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police and Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedural Law. Obstacles faced by Polri investigators in their authority to handle cases of corruption and abuse of authority include: confusion and contradictions in the interpretation of the Corruption Eradication Law, wrong understanding of the law by law enforcement officials, and limited infrastructure and information technology. This research provides important insights into the role and challenges of Polri investigators in the criminal justice system in cases of corruption and abuse of power.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anwaruddin, Drs. A. (2005). STRATEGI IMPLEMENTASI PERCEPATAN PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24258/JBA.V1I2.6
Elda, E. (2019). ARAH KEBIJAKAN PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA:KAJIAN PASCA PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI. Lex LATA, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.28946/LEXL.V1I2.477
FERDIAN ADI NUGROHO. (2017). LEGALITAS PENYIDIK KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI NON POLRI DAN KEJAKSAAN DALAM PENYIDIKAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/7019
Firdaus, M. F. (2015). Analisa Kritis terhadap “Penyalahgunaan Wewenang.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Bisnis, 20(3), 178798. https://www.neliti.com/publications/178798/
Hamzah, A. (2017). Korupsi di Indonesia Masalah dan Pemecahannya. Jakarta.
Hendry, D., & Waani, G. (2015). KEWENANGAN DAN PERANAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM PENYIDIKAN DAN PENUNTUTAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. LEX CRIMEN, 4(7). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/10095
Jonaedi Efendi. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=5OZeDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Metode+penelitian+yuridis+normatif&ots=6896j8w6r_&sig=0cH2KRD3frvSphHhq0jPWedpTGQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Metode%20penelitian%20yuridis%20normatif&f=false
KURNIAWAN, B. (2021). POLITIK HUKUM DI INDONESIA.
Lasmadi, S. (2010). Tumpang Tindih Kewenangan Penyidikan pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana. INOVATIF | Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(3). https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/jimih/article/view/200
Novi, F., Badan, A., Statistik, P., & Lampung, P. (2016). PENGUJIAN UNSUR PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN DAN/ATAU TINDAKAN PEJABAT PEMERINTAHAN OLEH PTUN. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(4), 647–670. https://doi.org/10.25041/FIATJUSTISIA.V10NO4.803
Nugroho, H. (2009). REKONSTRUKSI WEWENANG PENYIDIKAN DALAMPERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Kajian Kewenangan Polisi dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi). Jurnal Media Hukum, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.18196/JMH.V16I3.15365
Rudy Cahya Kurniawan. (2021). Pengaturan Kewenangan KPK Dan Polri Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Deepublish Publisher. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=A3smEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Kendala+yang+dihadapi+penyidik+Polri+dalam+menjalankan+kewenangannya+untuk+menangani+perkara+tindak+pidana+korupsi+&ots=mxchvxfZEO&sig=uQ6SFRT8uWcti1WC49nwH59Rovg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rusmana, I. P. E., Widyantara, I. M. M., & Suryani, L. P. (2021). Kewenangan Penyidik Kepolisian dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 2(3), 576–581. https://doi.org/10.22225/JPH.2.3.4018.576-581
S. Kader, A. (2014). Pemeriksaan Tersangka Oleh Penyidik Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Legal Opinion, 2(2), 146074. https://www.neliti.com/publications/146074/
Saragih, Y. M., Prasetyo, T., & Hafidz, J. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) sebagai Penuntut Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. UNIFIKASI : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.25134/UNIFIKASI.V5I1.763
Sekarsari, D. M., Sugiartha, I. N. G., & I Made Minggu Widyantara. (2022). WEWENANG KEPOLISIAN DALAM MELAKUKAN PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 3(3), 578–584. https://doi.org/10.55637/JPH.3.3.5581.578-584
Seroy, J., Santoso, E., & Rahmasari, L. (2022). PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG ATAU KEKUASAAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PEMERINTAH. JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 5(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.46930/JURNALRECTUM.V5I1.2543
Siahaan, H. P., Marlina, M., & Zul, M. (2019). Peran Kepolisian dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi pada Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Utara). ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum, 1(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.31289/ARBITER.V1I2.116
Sutendi, A. (2019). Negara Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Zaini, Z. D. (2011). Implementasi Pendekatan Yuridis Normatif dan Pendekatan Normatif Sosiologis dalam Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. PRANATA HUKUM, 6(2). http://jurnal.ubl.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/view/159