Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Tingkat Banding Di Pengadilan Tinggi Palembang
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This paper describes the high court as one of the pillars of law enforcement, including law enforcement against corruption, which rarely gets attention in scientific works or research. The research method used is juridical and empirical research methods. This can be seen from the lack of discussion in scientific works and research related to appeal cases in court at the High Court. The formulation of the problem to be studied is what are the factors that influence law enforcement against corruption at the Appeal Level at the Palembang High Court. Based on the results of the research and discussion of the subject matter, it can be concluded that the factors that influence law enforcement against corruption at the Appeal Level at the Palembang High Court include: legal factors, such as the authority of the panel of judges at PT in deciding cases only 3 or 4 times the trial only, referring to SEMA No. 2 of 2014 that the decision of the panel of judges may not last more than 3 months; Law enforcement factors, such as the workload of Judges at the Palembang High Court are quite heavy, even during a pandemic they have to resolve an average of 300 cases in one year; Facility factors, such as office facilities, courtrooms, means of communication and others; Community factors, such as opinions that develop in society which are usually expressed through the mass media; Cultural factors, such as being attached to the rule of law and the rule of ethics, sometimes make the profession of a judge a lonely profession, being on top of an ivory tower, and even having a house on the wind.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
FERDIAN ADI NUGROHO. (2017). LEGALITAS PENYIDIK KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI NON POLRI DAN KEJAKSAAN DALAM PENYIDIKAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/7019
Firdaus, M. F. (2015). Analisa Kritis terhadap “Penyalahgunaan Wewenang.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Bisnis, 20(3), 178798. https://www.neliti.com/publications/178798/
Hasan, M., & Azis, M. (2018). Pembangunan Ekonomi & Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Strategi Pembangunan Manusia dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Lokal. In Pembangunan Ekonomi & Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. CV. Nur Lina Bekerjasama dengan Pustaka Taman Ilmu.
Jonaedi Efendi. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=5OZeDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Metode+penelitian+yuridis+normatif&ots=6896j8w6r_&sig=0cH2KRD3frvSphHhq0jPWedpTGQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Metode%20penelitian%20yuridis%20normatif&f=false
KURNIAWAN, B. (2021). POLITIK HUKUM DI INDONESIA.
Mulyadi, L. (2013). EKSISTENSI HUKUM PIDANA ADAT DI INDONESIA : Pengkajian Asas, Norma, Teori, Praktik dan Prosedurnya. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 2(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.2.2.2013.225-246
Novi, F., Badan, A., Statistik, P., & Lampung, P. (2016). PENGUJIAN UNSUR PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN DAN/ATAU TINDAKAN PEJABAT PEMERINTAHAN OLEH PTUN. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(4), 647–670. https://doi.org/10.25041/FIATJUSTISIA.V10NO4.803
Prasetianingsih, R. (2011). Akuntabilitas Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Jurnal Konstitusi, 8(5), 829–848. https://doi.org/10.31078/JK858
RISKA DAMAYANTI, . (2022). EVALUASI PROGRAM PELATIHAN SERTIFIKASI HAKIM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK (SPPA) DI PUSAT PENDIDIKAN DAN PELATIHAN (PUSDIKLAT) TEKNIS PERADILAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG RI.
Saputra, D. (2022). ANALISIS SISTEM PERADILAN INDEPENDEN DALAM MEMBERANTAS KORUPSI DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Dan Pemerintahan, 1(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.55850/SIMBOL.V1I2.8
Setiadi, A. (2018). PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN DAN KOMPETENSI APARATUR TERHADAP KUALITAS PELAYANAN PUBLIK. Journal of Management Review, 2(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.25157/JMR.V2I2.1797
SOLIKIN, N., & ANAM, N. (2015). PENDIDIKAN ANTI KORUPSI: Konsep dan Aplikasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Anti Korupsi di Sekolah, dan Perguruan Tinggi.
Sukmareni, S. (2018). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi menurut Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. http://joernal.umsb.ac.id
Witjaksono, M. (2009). Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Ekonomi Pembangunan: Telaah Istilah dan Orientasi dalam Konteks Studi Pembangunan. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan, 1(1). http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jesp/article/view/5120