Implikasi Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Pelaksana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Atas Pengujian Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This study aims to examine the legal status and binding force of the Implementing Regulations enacted and analyze the legal implications of the formation of Implementing Regulations post-Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. The research method used is empirical with data collection through literature review, interviews, and supporting theories. The data analysis technique employed is descriptive qualitative. The results of the study indicate that the formation of three Implementing Regulations after Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 in the context of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation lacks legal status and binding force in the enforcement of norms. Moreover, Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, which examined the formal aspects of Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, has wide-ranging implications. Through its decision, the Constitutional Court, particularly in point 7, suspends actions or strategic policies with broad impacts and prohibits the issuance of implementing regulations.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anggono, B. D. (2020). Pokok-Pokok Pemikiran Penataan Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Konstitusi Press.
Aprianti, N., Safa’at, M. A., & Qurbani, I. D. (2021). Dualisme Model Pengujian Peraturan Daerah Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan), 9(2). https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/919/pdf_208
Astawa, D., & Arifin, F. (2021). SENGEKETA KEWENANGAN LEMBAGA NEGARA DI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI. Refika Aditama.
Azhara, M. A., & Mardhatillah, S. R. (2023). Partisipasi Publik dalam Penyusunan Dokumen Analisis Dampak Lingkungan Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang/Perppu Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 30(2), 257. https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/25646/15117
Hutabarat, S. T. M. (2017). Eksistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang. Lex Administratum, 5(1). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/15127/14690
Irawan, A. (2022). Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Di Tengah Himpitan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. LITIGASI, 23(1), 101–133. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v23i1.4773
Konstitusi, M. (2004). Cetak Biru Membangun Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Institusi Peradilan Konstitusi yang Modern dan Terpercaya. Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
KRHN, T. (2003). Pokok-Pokok Pikiran dan RUU Mahkamah Konstitusi. KRHN dan Kemitraan.
Mochtar, Z. A. (2021). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Diskursus Judicial Activism Vs Judicial Restraint. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Prang, A. J. (2011). Implikasi Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(1), 77–94. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/kanun/article/view/6233
Siahaan, M. (2020). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Soemantri, S. (1997). Hak Uji Material di Indonesia (2nd ed.). Alumni.
Wicaksono, D. A. (2016). Eksistensi dan Karakteristik Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(2), 350. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=505875&val=10359&title=Eksistensi dan Karakteristik Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi.