Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Pemberian Hibah yang Ditarik Kembali (Studi Putusan Nomor: 33/Pdt.G/2019/PN/PMS)
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This research was conducted with the aim of exploring the rights and obligations of grantors in revoking a grant, the legal impact on grant recipients who experience grant revocation, and analyzing the compatibility of Decision No. 33/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Pms of the Pematangsiantar District Court with the prevailing laws and regulations. This research used a normative legal approach and was descriptive in nature. The data collection methods used were library research and document analysis. Data analysis was conducted using qualitative analysis methods. The results of the research indicate that grantors have several rights based on Article 1669, Article 1671, and Article 1672 of the Civil Code and Article 212 of the Islamic Inheritance Law (KHI). Grantors also have the right to revoke their grant if the grant recipient fails to fulfill the obligations stipulated in the grant deed or other conditions specified in Article 1688 of the Civil Code. The legal impact on grant recipients who experience grant revocation is the return of the granted object to its original state before the agreement was made, as regulated by Article 1691 of the Civil Code. However, according to Article 212 of the KHI, a grant cannot be revoked, except in the case of a grant from a parent to their child, and this must be supported by a legally binding court decision. Based on the analysis of Decision No. 33/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Pms of the Pematangsiantar District Court, it can be concluded that the decision is in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
al-Jazirî, Abd al-Rahmân. 1972. Kitab al-Fiqh ‘alâ al-Mazâhib alArba’ah, Beirut: Dâr al-Fikr, juz III, 2010
Al-Jaziri, Abdurrahman, 1994. Fiqh Empat Madzhab IV, terj. Muhammad Zuhri, dkk, Semarang: As-Syifa‟, 504-506
Alyatama Budify, Jelitamon Ayu Lestari Manurung, Satria Braja Harianja, 2020. Pembatalan Akta Hibah Di Pengadilan Negeri Pematangsiantar: Kajian Putusan Nomor 33/Pdt.G/2019/Pn.Pms, SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol. 2, No. 1 (September 2020) 072 – 085
Arimurti, Asyura Triana, dan Putra, Mohamad Fajri Mekka 2022, Perspektif Terhadap Pembatalan Akta Hibah Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Atas Hibah Yang Tidak Diberikan Secara Cuma-Cuma (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kalianda Nomor: 31/Pdt.G/2020/Pn Kla), PALAR (Pakuan Law Review) Volume 08, Nomor 01, Januari-Juni 2022, Halaman 40-417
Awaliyah, Robiah dan Faizah, Nadjematul, 2020, Tinjauan Yuridis Perkara Pembatalan Hibah (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 467 K/Ag2017), al-Mizan, Vol. 4, No.2, hlm. 08-130, 2020
Catur, Bashori Dhofir, dan Ichsan, Miftahul, 2021, PEMBATALAN HIBAH OLEH PENGADILAN AGAMA, HAKAM; Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, Volume 5 nomor 1, Juni 2021
Hasanah. Sovia. (2019, 28 May). Arti Perbuatan Hukum, Bukan Perbuatan Hukum dan Akibat Hukum. Dalam HukumOnline.com. Diakses pada tanggal 27 Juni 2023
Islam, Ensiklopedi, 1997, Cet. IV, Jakarta: PT. IchtiarBaru Van Hoeve. 106.
Kie, Tan Thong. 2011. Studi Notariat Beberapa Mata Pelajaran dan Serba-Serbi Praktek Notaris, Cet. II, Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru van Hoeve, 2011. 432
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, 2011. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. 35
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 2011. Teori Hukum, Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya. 23
Muhammad, Syaikh al-‘Allamah. 2016. Fiqih Empat Mazhab, Bandung: Hasyimi. 293
Muhammad, Syikh. 2009. Panduan Wakaf, hibah dan Wasiat, Menurut Al-Quran dan asSunnah, Jakarta: Pustaka Imam Asy-Syafi‟i, 137
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono, 2000. Azas-Azas Hukum Perjanjian, Cet. VIII, Bandung: Mandar Maju. 1996.
Radbruch, Gustav, Gesetzliches Unrecht und Ubergesetzliches Recht (1946),
Rizqy Rachmat, Dan Sa'di, Mohammad Miftahus. (2021), Analisis Tentang Hibah Dan Korelasinya Dengan Kewarisan Dan Pembatalan Hibah Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia, Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Sekolah Tinggi Ekonomi Islam Sebi, 1
Rusyd, Ibnu, 1998. Bidâyah al Mujtahid Wa Nihâyah al Muqtasid, Semarang: Toha Putra. juz 2. 245
Rusydi, Ibnu, 2016. Hibah Dan Hubungannya Dengan Kewarisan Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Perdata, Jurnal Hukum. Volume 4 No. 2 September 2016, 155
Saptomo, Resta Yudi, 2022, Putusan Hakim Dalam Pemberian Hibah TerhadapAnak Yang Masih Dibawah Umur, Jurnal Akta Notaris|Vol.1No.2, Desember(2022)
Subekti, R. 1989, Aneka Perjanjian, Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Subekti, R. 1995, Aneka Perjanjian, Jakarta: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 94-95
Sudarsono. 2007. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta. 24
Suroso, Joko Trio, 2021, Pembatalan Pemberian Akta Hibah Yang Melanggar Legitieme Portie Ditinjau Dari Persfektif Hukum, Wacana Paramarta Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 20 No 2 (2021)
Syarifah, Inayatul, 2021, Analisis Maslahat Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Tentang Sengketa Harta Waris Yang Telah Dihibahkan (Studi Putusan Banding Nomor 0020/Pdt.G/2019/Pta.Bdl.), Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol.: 3 (2), 2021, 203-221
Wajdi, Muhammad Fasih, 2020, Pandangan Tokoh Agama terhadap Praktik Hibah Bersyarat (Studi Kasus di Desa Dukuh Tunggal Kecamatan Glagah, Kabupaten Lamongan), SAKINA: Journal of Family Studies Volume 4 Issue 2 2020
Zainuddin. Asriadi. 2017. Perbandingan Hibah Menurut Hukum Perdata Dan Hukum Islam, Jurnal Al-Himayah Volume 1 Nomor 1 Maret 2017, 92 - 105.