Akibat Hukum Pembubuhan Cap Ibu Jari Sebagai Pengganti Tanda Tangan Dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
A notarial deed must be signed by the parties involved. In some cases, the parties involved cannot put their signatures. The purpose of this study was to find out whether thumbprints can replace signatures in making notarial deeds and their legal consequences. This study uses normative legal research with secondary data and library research. The results of this study according to Article 1874 of the Civil Code and Article 44 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the UUJN regulates the affixing of a thumbprint as a substitute for a signature in making notarial deeds to people who are sick or disabled to read and write. These articles state that affixing a thumbprint as a substitute for a signature can be done on condition that the affixing must be done before an authorized official (Notary) and the Notary is required to include information or reasons regarding the person not being able to sign. The legal consequences of a deed not being signed are replaced by using a thumbprint, which is still valid and legally binding as an authentic deed as long as the provisions contained in Article 1874 of the Civil Code and Article 44 paragraphs (1) and (2) UUJN are fulfilled.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adjie, H. (2015). Penafsiran Tematik Hukum Notaris Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Refika Aditama.
Asofa, B. (2001). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Rineka Cipta.
Bidang, J. P., Noer, Z., & Fajriyah, Y. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Protokol Notaris Sebagai Arsip Negara. Jurnal Pro Hukum, 10(2).
Dewi, W. W., & R, I. (2020). Kekuatan Hukum Pelekatan Sidik Jari Penghadap Oleh Notaris Pada Minuta Akta. Acta Comitas, 5(3), 436. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i03.p01
Handayani, T. (2009). Pengakuan Tanda Tangan Pada Suatu Dokumen Elektronik Di Dalam Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia. Diponegoro University Institutional Repository. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11717751.pdf
Karjadi, M. (1976). Sidik Jari Sistem Henry. Politeia, 2–38.
Lubis, N. I. (2021). Implikasi Yurіdіs Penandatanganan Akta Dі Hadapan Notarіs Dengan Menggunakan Tanda Tangan Elektronіk. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(3), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.5114
Lumban Tobing, G. H. S. (1983). Peraturan jabatan notaris (notaris regelement). Erlangga.
Lumban Tobing, G. H. S. (1999). Peraturan Jabatan Notaris (notaris reglement). Erlangga.
Maduri, R. (2023). Keabsahan Cap Ibu Jari Sebagai Pengganti Tanda Tangan Dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris (Studi di kantor Notaris/PPAT Eko Permana SH,MKn di Labuhanbatu Utara). Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30743/jhah.v4i1.6896
Mertokusumo, S. (2002). Hukum Acara Perdata. Liberty.
Novelin, T., & Sarjana, I. M. (2021). Peran Notaris Dalam Penentuan Pembubuhan Sidik Jari Penghadap Dalam Minuta Akta. Acta Comitas, 6(02), 238. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i02.p02
Rahmawati, R. (2019). Implementasi Kewajiban Notaris untuk Melekatkan Sidik Jari Para Penghadap pada Minuta Akta. SASI, 25(1), 1–12.
Sajadi, I., Saptanti, N., & Supanto, S. (2015). Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Keabsahan Akta Notaris yang Dibuatnya Atas Penghadap yang Tidak Dapat Membaca dan Menulis. Repertorium, 2(2).
Santoso, L. (2016). Hukum Perikatan Teori Hukum dan Teknis Pembuatan Kontrak, Kerjasama dan Bisnis. Setara Press.
Soemitro, R. H. (1990). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurumetri. PT Ghalia Indonesia.
Suwignyo, H. (2009). Keabsahan Cap Jempol Sebagai Pengganti Tanda Tangan Dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Notarius. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v1i1.1126
Swandewi, I. A. P. (2016). Pengesahan Akta Notaris Bagi Penghadap Yang Mengalami Cacat Fisik. Acta Comitas. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i01.p03
Tan, K. T. (2007). Studi Notariat dan Serba-Serbi Praktek Notaris. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.
Tandiabang, R. M., Patria, H., & Barnea, A. (2019). Otentikasi Dokumen Elektronik Menggunakan Tanda Tangan Digital. Departemen Teknik Informatika Institut Teknologi Bandung.
Utomo, H. W. I. (2015). Penggunaan Surrogate Sebagai Pengganti Tanda Tangan Dalam Akta Notaris Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kedudukan Akta. Jurnal Hukum: Universitas Narotama Surabaya.