Comparison of Methods for Resolving Child Custody Disputes After Parental Divorce

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Nadia Rezky
Arino Bemi Sado

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the comparison of two post-divorce child custody dispute resolution methods (litigation and non-litigation) along with the obstacles and challenges faced in finding a solution. This research is qualitative research with field research methods and data obtained through observation, interviews and documentation. The result is obstacles in resolving child custody disputes through litigation methods in court which require a long time, large costs and are difficult to implement the judge's decision, especially if the child is in the control of the losing party and does not want to hand over the child voluntarily. There are no specific rules regarding the implementation of hadhanah and considering the child's psychology, so that often the judge's decision is an illusory (futile) decision. Meanwhile, the obstacles to the non-litigation method are that it relies heavily on cooperation and awareness of both parties and there is still a lack of access to special services for the general public to carry out mediation without having to go to court. For this reason, it is necessary to increase competence and innovative approaches for professionals involved in resolving child custody disputes, the formation of policies that are oriented towards the interests of children and awareness of parents to prioritize the best interests of children rather than ego alone.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Rezky, N., & Sado, A. (2024). Comparison of Methods for Resolving Child Custody Disputes After Parental Divorce. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 6(1), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v6i1.4483

References

Adikara, B. (2023). 5 Eks Pasutri Ini Masih Kompak Urus Anak Meski Sudah Bercerai. JawaPos.Com. https://jawapos.com/entertainment/01664698/5-eks-pasutri-ini-masih-kompak-urus-anak-meski-sudah-bercerai?page=3.
Anam, M. A., & Farida, Y. E. (2023). Pengasuhan Anak Pasca Perceraian dalam Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, 4(3), 1649–1656. https://doi.org/10.36312/jcm.v4i3
Dahlan, A. A. (1999). Ensiklopedi Hukum Islam. Ikhtiar Baru Van Hoepe.
Faisal, N., & Abdul Hamid Bashori. (2022). Apresiasi Negara Terhadap Penyelesaian HAK Asuh Anak Melalui Mediasi. As-Shahifah : Journal of Constitutional Law and Governance, 1(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.19105/asshahifah.v1i2.6934
Gushairi. (2022). Eksekusi Anak dan Problematikanya di Indonesia. Ditjen Badilag Blog.
Hutabarat, S., & Ananda, F. (2024). Ketidakpastian Hak Asuh Anak Akibat Perceraian Orang Tua. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(1), 4441–4449. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative
Islami, I., & Sahara, A. (2019). Legalitas Penguasaan Hak Asuh Anak Dibawah Umur (Hadhanah) Kepada Bapak Pasca Perceraian. Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 6(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v6i2.10715
Karima, N. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perceraian Melalui Mediasi dan Hubungannya dengan Hadhanah (Hak Asuh Anak) di Pengadilan Agama Stabat (Studi Perkara Nomor : 980/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Stb). JSL: Journal Smart Law, 1(1), 25–33. https://jurnal.perima.or.id/index.php/JSL/article/view/38/31
Lestari, R. A., Insani, R., & Handayani, P. (2024). Pengaruh Perceraian Orang Tua Terhadap Perkembangan Emosional Anak. Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa, 2(1), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.54066/jikma.v2i1.1194
Maghfirah, M., & Gushairi, G. (2020). Konsep Shared Parenting dalam Hadhanah Pasca Perceraian; Kajian Perundang-Undangan Perkawinan Islam Kontemporer. Hukum Islam, 20(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.24014/jhi.v20i2.12169
Manan, A. (2000). Problematika Hadhanah dan Hubungannya dengan Praktik Hukum Acara di Peradilan Agama. Mimbar Hukum, 49.
Munir, M. (2021). Konsep Mediasi Konflik Suami Istri Menurut Tafsir Surah An-Nisa’ Ayat 35. ASA: Jurnal Pengembangan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 2(3), 15–27. https://ejournal.stisabuzairi.ac.id
Noor, F., Al-Amruzi, M. F., & Hasan, A. (2023). Problematika Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Putusan Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama (Studi Kasus Nomor 342/PDT.G/2020/PA.MTP Jo Putusan Banding Nomor 32/PDT.G/2020/PTA.BJM Jo Putusan Kasasi Nomor 392 K/AG/2021). Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 17(6), 4085–4104. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v17i6.2808
Nuraisyah, B., Abidin, Z., Hidayati, A. F., & Febriyana, A. I. (2024). Analisis Dampak Keluarga Broken Home Pada Perilaku Siswa. IHSANIKA : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(1), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.59841/ihsanika.v2i1.801
Nuruddin, A., & Tarigan, A. A. (2006). Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia: Studi Kritis Perkembangan Hukum Islam dari Fikih, UU No.1/1974 sampai KHI. Prenada Media Grup.
Puspitosari, H. (2014). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemeliharaan Anak di Bawah Umur Akibat Perceraian oleh Pengadilan Agama Ditinjau dari Perspektif Feminis Yurisprudence. Rechstaat: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 1–19. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/163528-ID-penyelesaian-sengketa-pemeliharaan-anak.pdf
Rahman, T. A., & Rizkianti, W. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Asuh Anak Setelah Perceraian: Perbandingan Antara Indonesia dan Inggris. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(1), 348–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i1.8801
Sabiq, S. (1983). Fiqh Sunnah Jilid 8. Dar al-Fikr.
Santoso, A. P. A. (2021). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Pustaka Baru Press.
Sari, R. P. (2021). Drama Panjang Perebutan Hak Asuh Anak Atalarik Syach dan Tsania Marwa. Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/hype/read/2021/04/29/133101866/drama-panjang-perebutan-hak-asuh-anak-atalarik-syach-dan-tsania-marwa?page=all
Sofiana, N. E. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Asuh Anak Melalui Litigasi: Kajian Perkara No. 011/Pdt. G/2018/Pta. Plk. Indonesian Journal of Shariah and Justice (IJSJ), 2(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.46339/ijsj.v2i1.29
Syahrain, F. (2017). Penetapan Hak Asuh Anak di Bawah Umur Akibat Perceraian Perspektif Hukum Islam. Lex et Societatis, 5(7), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v5i7.18095