Normative Analysis of Incest Sanctions in Mandailing Customary Law from an Islamic Criminal Law Perspective

Authors

  • Nurul Fadilah Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Sukiati Sukiati Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v6i1.5159

Keywords:

Customary law; Incestuous Sexual Relations; Incest; Islamic Criminal Law

Abstract

Incestor incestuous sexual relations are acts that are prohibited by law, including customary law and Islamic law. The prohibition of incest in the legal context is categorized as a crime that damages the basic social order of society. This study aims to explore how sanctions are applied to incest perpetrators in the context of Mandailing customary law and Islamic criminal law. This research adopts a qualitative approach in its research methodology. Data was collected using interview techniques extracted from sources in the field. This study concludes that the legal sanction for perpetrators of incest according to Mandailing customary law is by expelling the perpetrator of the crime of incest from his village. According to Islamic criminal law, the sanction imposed on married perpetrators of incest crimes is the death penalty, and unmarried perpetrators are punished by flogging and exile. Compared to Islamic law, the sanctions for implementing customary law in Mandailing can be considered lighter. It is hoped that this study will provide an overview of the variations in decision-making regarding the crime of incest under different laws. This study is also expected to contribute to the development of legal discourse in society, especially customary law on the one hand and Islamic legal perspectives on the other.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, S., Jum’ati, & Luhukay, R. S. (2023). Consanguineous Relations (Incest) Carried Out Consensually at an Adult Age From the Perspektive of a Crime of Morality. Luris Media, 6(1).
Adimaya, S. (2024). Implementation of Customary Criminal Law Against Perpetrators of Incest Crimes in Indonesia (Case Study in Rejang Lebong District). Ipso Jure Journal, 1(3).
Al-Zuhayli, W. (1989). Al-Fiqh al-Islami Wa Adillatuhu. Dar Al-Fikri.
Anshori, I. (2019). Critical Analysis of the Anatomy of Claude Levi-Strauss Structuralist Theory (the Prohibition of Incest in the Marriage and Kinship System, and its Relevance to Islamic Education. Islamic Education Journal, 3(1).
Ardianto, E. (2004). Theory and Methodology “Public Relations.” Communication Journal Mediator, 5(2).
Aziz, A. (2019). The Prohibition of Incestuous Marriage in View of Islamic Law. Irtifaq, 6(2).
Azizah, S. N. W., & Wibowo, H. D. (2023). Victimological Analysis in Incest Crimes. Journal of Law and State Administration, 1(3).
Bungnin, B. (2007). Qualitative Research Methods, Methodological Actualization towards Contemporary Variants. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Busyro, M. (2017). Efforts to Overcome Criminal Acts of Incest With Child Victims. News Journal Edition, 52.
Efendi, S., & Kasih, D. (2022). Efforts to Overcome Sexual Violence Against Children in West Aceh from an Islamic Legal Perspective. Journal of Islamic Legislation and Criminal Law, 7(2).
Eliza, N. (2022). Juridical Analysis of Criminal Liability for Incest. Universitas HKBP Nommensen.
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Understand the Design of Qualitative Research Methods. Humanics Scientific Studies General Subjects, 21(1).
Fuad, A. (2010). Inheritance of Children Resulting from Incest. Al-Ahwal, 3(1).
Haipon, H., & Yasinta, M. (2022). Due.Marriage According to Lio Customary Law and the Prohibition of Incest in terms of Law No. 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage amendements to Law No. 1 of 1974 Wojolita Sub-District, Ende District. Dharma Andalas University Legal Dedication Journal, 1(2).
Hendriko. (2024). Interwiew.
Husamuddin, & Liana, E. (2021). Resolving Jarimah Incest in Jinayah Fiqh (Study in Gampong Lawe Sawah, East Kluet District, South Aceh District). Maqasidi Journal of Sharia and Law, 1(2), 74–85.
Iradah, S., & Diah, M. (2022). Punishment for the Crime of Rape Against a Mahram (Perspective of Article 49 of Qanun Jinayat and Article 485 of Criminal Code). Islamic Family Law Journal, 1(1).
Irza, M. Y. (2023). Implementation of Criminal Responsibility for Perpetrators of Incest Against Biological Children. Faculty Of Law-Universitas Wijayakusuma, 5(2).
Khalisa, R. (2023). Jarimah Hudud Adultery for Married and Unmarried Perpetrators From the Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law. Journal of Religius Studies and Da’wah, 1(2).
Lubis, E. (2015). One Clan Marriage in Mandailing Customs in Huta Pungkut Village Islamic Legal Perspective. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Lubis, S. D. (2023). The Legal consequences of Zihar on Marriege are Viewed From the Law and the Compilation of Islamic law. Journal of Constitutional Law and Islamic Politics, x(1).
Luthfiyah, D. (2021). Juridical Analysis of Incest According to Islamic Law. E-Journal Fatwa Law Faculty of Law Tanjungpura University, 4(2).
Manik, S. Z. (2002). Victims and Treatment of Female Victims of Incest. PKPA Child Protection and Study Center.
Murdiyanto, & Gutomo, T. (2019). Causes, Impact and Preventation of Incest. Social Welfare Research Information Media, 43(1).
Nasution, I., & Hasibuan, N. H. (2023). Acculturation of Islamic Law and Local Wisdom: a Study of Shifting Traditions, Customary Legal Sanction for Marriage Within the Batak Angkola Community. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 4(2).
Nugraha, A. T. S. (2015). Repression of Incest (Study of Incest Cases in Aran Pandang Regency. Journal of the Sociology of Religion, 9(2).
Nuroniyah, W. (2022a). The Phenomenon of Incestuous Sexual Violence (Incest) in Kriyan Cirebon in a Review of Islamic Law and Positive Law. Equalita, 4(2).
Nuroniyah, W. (2022b). The Phenomenon of Incestuous Sexual Violence (Incest) in Kriyan Cirebon in a Review of Islamic Law and Positive Law. Equalita Journal, 4(2).
Pohan, M. (2017). Marriage of the Mandailing Batak Immigrant Community in Yogyakarta. Al-Ahwal, 10(2).
Putra, W. S. (2022). Consanguineous Marriage From the Perspective of Islam and National Law. Landraad: Journal of Sahria and Law, 1(2).
Rachmawati, I. N. (2007). Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews. Indonesian Nursing Journal, 11(1).
RI. (1995). Indonesian Dictionary. Balai Pustaka.
RI, K. (2019). Al-Qur’an and its translation. Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an.
Safaruddin, R. (2023). Qualitative Research. Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(2).
Sari, N. L., & Afifah, W. (2021). Criminal Weighting for Perpetrators of Incestuous Rape. 8(1), 2355–2611.
Sobirin, A. (2024). Interview.
Sufrizal, & Anzaikhan, M. (n.d.). Consanguineous Marriage in the Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law. State Islamic Institute Law Journal.
Sukiati. (2016). Research Methodology An Introduction. CV. Manhaji.
Sukma, D. M. (2021). Causal factors and efforts to overcome incidents of incest: Study Literature. Journal of Nursing, Health and Pharmacy Analysis, 21(2).
Sunarti. (2021). Crime of Incest (Comparative Analysis of Islamic Criminal Law (Jinayah) and Indonesian Criminal Law). Sinjai Muhammadiyah Islamic Institute.
Supratik, A. (1995). Recognizing Abnormal Behavior. Kanisius.
Swarianata, V. (2016). Criminalization of Incest From the Perspective of Criminal Law Reform. Brawijaya University Law Faculty Student Journal.
Tambunan, U. M., & Harahap, M. M. (2023). Law Enforcement for Perpetrators of Incest Crimes Against Minors in the Perspective of Positive Criminal Law and Islamic Criminal Law. Unes Law Review Journal, 6(2).
Tanjung, F. F. (2018). Review of Islamic Law on Single Clan Marriages in Mandailing Batak Society. Indonesian Islamic University.
Wotulo, F. A. (2017). The Position of the Offense of Incest in the Indonesian Criminal Law System. Lex Crimen, VI(4).
Zalzabella, D. C. (2020). Factors Causing Incest Rape. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1(1).

Downloads

Published

2024-08-10

How to Cite

Fadilah, N., & Sukiati, S. (2024). Normative Analysis of Incest Sanctions in Mandailing Customary Law from an Islamic Criminal Law Perspective. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 6(1), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v6i1.5159

Issue

Section

Articles