Transparency Of Information In Upselling Practices In The Modern Retail Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v7i2.8386Keywords:
Upselling, Information Transparency, Consumer ProtectionAbstract
The development of globalization and digital technology has spurred the evolution of selling practices in modern retail and e-commerce, which, lacking information transparency, can harm consumers via dark patterns. This study aims to analyze the role and responsibilities of the National Consumer Protection Agency (BPKN) in addressing upselling in Indonesia and compare its enforcement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the United States. The methodology employed is normative juridical, complemented by primary empirical data from interviews with BPKN and YLKI, using a comparative approach. Findings indicate that BPKN is passive and reactive, limited to a recommendatory function, which hinders optimal consumer protection. In sharp contrast, the FTC adopts a conduct-based model with strict investigative and punitive authority, imposing substantial sanctions to combat deceptive digital practices. The low transparency in Indonesia is attributed to the general regulatory framework (UUPK) and BPKN's institutional limitations. This study concludes that strengthening technical regulations, promoting proactive monitoring, and increasing BPKN's authority are essential for creating more adaptive and effective consumer protection.
References
Andina, F., L. Ruth, T. Siagian, & A. Dwi Bayanaka. (2021). "PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMASARAN UPSELLING TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN KONSUMEN (STUDI KASUS Jco MALL GRAHA CIJANTUNG)." 16(2):40–48.
Franjković, J., D. Dujak, dan A. Živković. 2023. “Pricing and Information Transparency in the Age of Multichannel Retail.” 33rd RSEP International Conference on Economics, Finance & Business 17–25.
Arianto. 2025. Bidang Pengaduan Dan Komunikasi YLKI.
Sharma, A., N. Patel, dan R. Gupta. (2022). "Optimizing Product Upselling Strategies Using Reinforcement Learning and Natural Language Processing Algorithms." European Advanced AI Journal 11(9): 1-10
Ulya, S. L., dan R. E. Latumahina. (2025). "Consumer Protection against Upselling Practices in Food Product Marketing Strategies." Journal Evidence of Law 4(1):51–60.
Cheah, R. (2022). "Inhuman destiny": Naturalism, propaganda, and despair before Rawls's conversion. Modern Intellectual History 20(3): 1–26.
Eich, S. 2021. Theodicy of Growth: John Rawls, Political Economy, and Reasonable Faith. Modern Intellectual History 18: 984–1009.
Kumar, A., A. Joshi, FNU Antara, S. P. Singh, O. Goel, dan P. K. Gopalakrishna. 2023. “Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Customer Engagement and Upsell Opportunities.” International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (IJCSE) 12(2):89–114.
Federal Trade Commission. N.D.-B. “FTC Says AT&T Has Misled Millions Of Consumers With ‘Unlimited’ Data Promises.” Retrieved (FTC Says AT&T Has Misled Millions Of Consumers With ‘Unlimited’ Data Promises %7C Federal Trade Commission).
FTC. (N.D.). Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. (United States).
Fletcher, L. (2023). A modern theodicy: John Rawls and The Law of Peoples. European Journal of Political Theory, 24(1), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851231201471 (Original work published 2025)
Alex, A. (2021). "A Comprehensive Study on Newer Trends in Recruitment Practices with Reference to Retail Industry." International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 1(1): 1-20
Ghozali, A. F., & T. Hardyanthi. (2024). "Perlindungan Konsumen Pada Platform E-Commerce: Regulasi Dan Peran Pemerintah." Ethics And Law Journal: Business And Notary 2(3):136–41.
Giovanola, Benedetta, and Roberta Sala. 2021. "The reasons of the unreasonable: Is political liberalism still an option?" Philosophy & Social Criticism 48(9): 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537211040568.
Hertita, D. (2023). Setiap Pebisnis Harus Tahu Promo Upselling Cross-selling Ini!. Elex Media Komputindo.
Narang, R., dan S. Tiwari. (2025). "Role of Modern Technology in Unorganized Retail Sector." Journal of the Knowledge Economy 16(1):1717–1744.
Jiputra, J. A., Z. J. H. Tarigan, dan H. Siagian. 2021. “The Effect of Information Technology on Retailer Satisfaction through Supply Chain Management Practices and Retailer-Distributor Relationship in Modern Retailer Surabaya.” International Journal of Business Studies 3(2):126–134.
Idris, M. (2020). The Kazanistan papers: Reading the muslim question in the John Rawls archives. Perspectives on Politics 19(1): 110–130
Imtihani, H., Arief Suryono, Tri Agus Suswantoro, Muhammad Nasser, & Heridadi, H. (2024). Corporate Law on Corporate Social Responsibility from the Perspective of John Rawls' Theory of Justice. Journal of Law, Politics and Humanities, 4(6), 2308–2313. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.748
Kędziora, Krzysztof. 2021. “Habermas on Rawls and the normative foundations of democracy.” European Journal of Social Theory 24(4): 545-561.
Tarigan, Z. J. H., J. A. Jiputra, dan H. Siagian. 2021. “The Effect of Supply Chain Practices on Retailer Performance with Information Technology as Moderating Variable.” International Journal of Data and Network Science 5(1):47–54.
Muhammad, A. B., S. Survival, dan H. R. Iswari. (2025). "HRM Practices in Modern Retail: Organizational Commitment, Work Pressure, and Perceived Organizational Support Toward Job Satisfaction.” International Conference on Digital Business Innovation and Technology Management (ICONBIT) 1(2): 20-33
Madung, Gusti Ndegong. (2022). Konsep Liberalisme Politik John Rawls sebagai Jawaban terhadap Tantangan Masyarakat Plural dan Kritik atasnya: John Rawls’ Liberalism as a Response to the Challenge of Contemporary Plural Society and Some Arguments against It. DISKURSUS - JURNAL FILSAFAT DAN TEOLOGI STF DRIYARKARA, 18(2):218-237. https://doi.org/10.36383/diskursus.v18i2.327
Mansiz, M. I., M. A. L. Wawen, Z. A. Putra, And H. Citra. 2024. “Dinamika Perlindungan Konsumen: Tantangan Dan Strategi Resolusi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 1(1):77–81.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 4 Tahun 1999 Tentang Badan Pelindungan Konsumen Nasional.
Putri, R. C. 2025. “Dark Patterns Sebagai Bentuk Manipulasi Perilaku Konsumen Digital: Analisis Interdisipliner Terhadap Dampak Psikologis, Hukum, Dan Ekonomi Dari Praktik Desain Manipulatif Dalam Ekosistem E-Commerce Global. RIGGS.” Journal Of Artificial Intelligence And Digital Business 4(2):1066–71.
Putri, S. N., & H. Sugiyono. (2023). "Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Usaha Pemberi Diskon Palsu Dalam Praktik Jual Beli Event Tanggal Kembar E-Commerce." Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 4(3):536–46.
Raji, M. A., H. B. Olodo, T. T. Oke, W. A. Addy, O. C. Ofodile, dan A. T. Oyewole. (2024). "Real-Time Data Analytics in Retail: A Review of USA and Global Practices." GSC Advanced Research and Reviews 18(3):059–065.
Ramadani, A. A., E. Abimanyu, & P. S. Yudana. (2021). "Peran KPPU Dalam Penanganan COVID-19 Deceptive Acts And Practices (Studi Komparasi United States Federal Trade Commission)." Jurnal Persaingan Usaha 1(1):32.
Ravi, V. K., V. B. R. Bhimanapati, P. Chopra, A. Ayyagari, P. Goel, dan A. Jain. (2022). "Data Architecture Best Practices in Retail Environments." International Journal of Applied Mathematics & Statistical Sciences (IJAMSS) 11(2):395–420.
Sagar, S. (2024). "The Impact of Digital Transformation on Retail Management and Consumer Behavior." Journal of Business and Management 26(1):06–14.
Madhumanchi, C. (2025). "AI-Powered Retail Ecosystem: From Predictive Analytics to Personalized Shopping." Journal of Applied Sciences 5(7):1–11.
Islam, M. A., dan C. J. Van Staden. (2022). "Modern Slavery Disclosure Regulation and Global Supply Chains: Insights from Stakeholder Narratives on the UK Modern Slavery Act." Journal of Business Ethics 180(2):455–479.
Salsabila, A. (2024). "Akibat Hukum Penerapan Strategi Pemasaran Up Selling Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli." Dinamika 30(1):9139–57.
Zhang, D., R. Frei, G. Wills, E. Gerding, S. Bayer, dan P. K. Senyo. 2023. “Strategies and Practices to Reduce the Ecological Impact of Product Returns: An Environmental Sustainability Framework for Multichannel Retail.” Business Strategy and the Environment 32(7):4636–4661.
Sulaiman, H., Lusi Marwati, S. A., Tri Sulistiowati, & Aris Machmud. (2025). "John Rawls' Theory of Justice and Its Relevance in the Formulation of Community Property Division Policy in the Contemporary Era: Teori Keadilan John Rawls Dan Relevansinya Dalam Formulasi Kebijakan Pembagian Harta Bersama Di Era Kontemporer". Al Hairy | Journal of Islamic Law 1(1): 25–36.
The Leap. 2024. “Indonesia’s E-Commerce Market Hits Rp487 Trillion In 2024, Leads Southeast Asia’s Digital Economy.” Retrieved (Indonesia’s E-Commerce Market Hits Rp487 Trillion In 2024, Leads Southeast Asia’s Digital Economy).
Triyudiana, & Neneng, P. 2024. Penerapan Prinsip Keadilan Sebagai Fairness Menurut John Rawls Di Indonesia Sebagai Perwujudan Dari Pancasila. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 2(01).
Ulya, S. L., & R. E. Latumahina. (2025). "Consumer Protection Against Upselling Practices In Food Product Marketing Strategies." Journal Evidence Of Law 4(1):51–60.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pelindungan Konsumen.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik
Wahyudhi, S., & Achsan Baihaqi, F. (2023). Kontekstualisasi Teori Keadilan John Rawls Pada Konstelasi Kemasyarakatan di Indonesia. Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 6(2), 352-363. https://doi.org/10.31538/almada.v6i2.3393
Widiarty, W. (2024). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Publika Global Media.
Wulansari, R. 2025. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Atas Pelanggaran Hak Informasi Penjualan Produk Di Gerai Donat J. CO Indonesia.” In Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia 143–58.
Chourasia, D., dan M. Shahid. (2025). "Customising Keyboard Accessibility for Data-Entry Intensive Workflows: A Case Study of the Automotive Retail Industry." International Conference on Research into Design:179–191.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aurellia Zerikha Syah, Heru Sugiyono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








