Comparative Analysis Of Electronic Agreement Regulations Online Arisan In Indonesia And Malaysia

(Study Decision No. 106/Pdt.G/2017/Pn Plk)

Authors

  • Salsas Bila Juniyanti Tanjung Universitas pembangunan nasional vetran jakarta
  • Atik Winanti University of National Development, Faculty of Law, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v7i2.8446

Keywords:

Online arisan; Electronic agreement; Contract Law

Abstract

The development of information technology has transformed the way people engage in economic activities, including the conduct of online arisan (rotating savings groups). Online arisan represents an electronic agreement between parties that does not require written documentation but still establishes legally binding rights and obligations. This study aims to analyze and compare the legal regulations governing online arisan agreements in Indonesia and Malaysia, using Decision No. 106/Pdt.G/2017/PN Palangka Raya as a case study. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory, case, and comparative approaches. The results show that in Indonesia, online arisan agreements are considered valid as long as they fulfill the requirements stipulated in Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code and are carried out in accordance with the principles of freedom of contract, good faith, and pacta sunt servanda. Meanwhile, in Malaysia, online arisan activities, also known as kumpulan wang kutu, are regulated under several laws, including the Contracts Act 1950, the Electronic Commerce Act 2006, and the Kumpulan Wang Kutu (Prohibition) Act 1971. This study concludes that Indonesia emphasizes contractual freedom and legal validity, while Malaysia prioritizes consumer protection through strict prohibition, reflecting fundamentally different regulatory approaches to online collective financial arrangements.

References

Andani, D., Ariyani, N., & Hapsari, M. A. (2023). Pentingnya Memahami Arisan Online dalam Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian Bagi Karang Taruna Unit Pedukuhan Kalipucang Yogyakarta. In Journal DAS SEIN (Vol. 3, Issue 1). http://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/dassein/

Azhari, R. A., & Saleh, R. (2024). PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA TENTANG E-COURT. 9(9). https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i9

Br Ginting, J. (2022). KEKUATAN MENGIKAT PERJANJIAN SECARA LISAN. In THE JURIS: Vol. VI (Issue 2). http://ejournal.stih-awanglong.ac.id/index.php/juris

Christiana, C., Fitri, W., & Silviani, N. Z. (2024). Studi Komparasi Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online antara Indonesia dengan Malaysia. PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review, 4(3), 279. https://doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v4i3.2311

Fathi Bin Yusof, M. (2016). UNDANG-UNDANG KONTRAK DI MALAYSIA.

Gultom, F., & Subhandi Bakhtiar, H. (2025). PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM GUGATAN SEDERHANA ANTARA INDONESIA DANGAN MALAYSIA SEBAGAI UPAYA EFEKTIF APABILA TERJADINYA WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN. Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal, 2(2), 3009.

Hartanto, H. (2019). KARAKTERISTIK PENERAPAN HUKUM EKONOMI TERHADAP PEMBANGUNAN DI INDONESIA. Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum, 1(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v1i2.45

Hermawan, M. W., & Putranto, R. D. (2024). ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN PARA PIHAK ARISAN ONLINE DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERDATA. IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 4.

KBBI online. (2025). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). 22 Desember 2025. https://kbbi.web.id/arisan

Kornelis, Y. (2019). UNSUR ACCIDENTALIA DALAM PEMBELIAN ONLINE PRE ORDER DIKAITAN DENGAN ASAS KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK. In Journal of Judicial Review: Vol. XXI (Issue 1).

LAWS OF MALAYSIA. (2006).

LAWS OF MALAYSIA. (2019).

LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. (2006).

Manap, A. M. (2018). KONTRAK ELEKTRONIK: ISU DAN PENYELESAIAN UNDANG-UNDANG. Journal of Law & Governance, 1, 62–76.

Manurung, S. A., Irawati, J., Sudirman, L., Agustianto, A., & Farahdina, F. (2025). Comparison of Agreement Law in Indonesia and Malaysia: Phenomenon of Standard Agreement Practices. SASI, 31(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v31i1.2683

Marzuki, M. P. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi.

Mastura, P. (2025, November 7). Latar Belakang Undang-Undang di Malaysia. April 15, 2008. https://www.ikim.gov.my/latar-belakang-undang-undang-kontrak-di-malaysia/

Melati, N. D. (2023). KEKUATAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN LISAN DALAM ARISAN ONLINE DAN PENYELESAIAN HUKUM APABILA TERJADI WANPRESTASI. SKRIPSI.

Mohamad, N. I. (2022, February 14). Wanita didenda anjur kumpulan “wang kutu.” https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/kes/2022/02/922401/wanita-didenda-anjur-kumpulan-wang-kutu

Nasution, A., Maulana, F., Qonita, H., & Id, A. (2023). Legalitas Perjanjian Tidak Tertulis Arisan Online Ditinjau Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. 6(2). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2

Nisrina, R. (2024, March 26). Mengenal Ketentuan Hukum Mengenai Arisan Online. 22 Desember 2025. https://nenggalaalugoro.org/2024/03/26/mengenal-ketentuan-hukum-mengenai-arisan-online/

Nugroho, A. A., Winanti, A., & Surahmad, S. (2020). Personal Data Protection in Indonesia: Legal Perspective. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(7), 183. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i7.1773

Patrimonium, L. (2023). Article 12 May 2023 Part of the Civil Law Commons, Contracts Commons, Family Law Commons, and the Torts Commons. Recommended Citation Salsabila in Lex Patrimonium (Vol. 2, Issue 1).

Prabandari, D. M. (2024). Tinjauan Qardh Terhadap Praktik Arisan Online (Studi Kasus Grub Whatsapp “Nyell” Di Ponorogo). SKRIPSI Iain Ponorogo.

Pratiwi, S. F., Pitaloka, I. N., Rofi Arsy, M. E., Isma, I., Samboro, T. C., & Rakhmawati, A. N. (2020). Analisis Kegiatan Arisan Online Yang Dilakukan di Grup Facebook. JIEET (Journal of Information Engineering and Educational Technology), 04.

Priyono, E. A. (2025). PERANAN ASAS ITIKAD BAIK DALAM KONTRAK BAKU (Upaya Menjaga Keseimbangan bagi Para Pihak).

Puspita, L., & Gunadi, A. (n.d.). ANALISIS KEKUATAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN LISAN ARISAN ONLINE YANG MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA APLIKASI FACEBOOK MESSENGER DALAM PEMBUKTIAN DI PEMGADILAN DI TINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TEKNOLOGI ELEKTRONIK NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO. 106/PDT.G/2017/PN.PLK).

Rofi Ayyasy, & Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar. (2025). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia. Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v3i2.5061

Saiman, M. Z., & Dahlan Salleh, A. (2021). Parameter Skim Kutu Emas Berdasarkan Karakter (Takyif) Fiqh Parameter Of The Gold Flea Scheme Based On Character of (Takyif) Fiqh.

Semula, C. (2014). Undang-Undang Malaysia.

Sinaga, N. A. (2018). PERANAN ASAS-ASAS HUKUM PERJANJIAN DALAM MEWUJUDKAN TUJUAN PERJANJIAN (Vol. 7, Issue 2).

Sinaga, P. I., Lim, J. A., & Kezya. (2024). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN HUKUM INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA MENGENAI KETENTUAN PERJANJIAN BAKU. PERAHU (Penerangan Hukum) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12.

Sufiarina, S., Ismoyo, D. J., Judijanto, L., & Kurniati, Y. (2024). Hukum Perdata : Asas-Asas dan Perkembangannya (Sapriano, Ed.).

Suhada, M. F. (2022). PERJANJIAN ARISAN SECARA ONLINE DI TINJAU DARI HUKUM PERDATA DAN HUKUM ISLAM.

Sunarjo. (2015). PERBANDINGAN HUKUM INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA TERHADAP KETIDAKSEIMBANGAN DALAM PERJANJIAN BAKU. 6(Juni), 109–117. www.jchunmer.wordpress.com

Suruhanjaya Syarika Malaysia. (2025, November 11). Aktivitas Pelaburan Wang Kutu Yang Dilarang. September 19, 2018. https://www.ssm.com.my/Pages/Publication/Press_Release/2018/Aktiviti-Wang-Kutu-Yang Terlarang.aspx

Syamsiah, D., Martin Bala Bao, R., & Fatihah Yuliana, N. (2023). DASAR PENERAPAN ASAS PACTA SUNT SERVANDA DALAM PERJANJIAN.

Umam, K., & Fidhyanti, D. (2022). PENYALAHGUNAAN KEADAAN SEBAGAI ALASAN PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN (Studi Komperatif Antara Indonesia Dan Malaysia). SKRIPSI.

Valda, A., & Walangitang, V. (2023). PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP PRODUK KADALUWARSA (STUDI PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA). 5(4). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4

Wulandari, S. (2024). TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN ARISAN ONLINE MENURUT HUKUM PERDATA DI INDONESIA. In THE JURIS: Vol. VIII (Issue 2). http://ejournal.stih-awanglong.ac.id/index.php/juris

Downloads

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

Tanjung, S. B. J., & Winanti, A. (2025). Comparative Analysis Of Electronic Agreement Regulations Online Arisan In Indonesia And Malaysia : (Study Decision No. 106/Pdt.G/2017/Pn Plk). AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 7(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v7i2.8446

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Salsas Bila Juniyanti Tanjung, Atik Winanti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright:

An author who publishes in Al-Manhaj agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

License:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.