Legal Analysis of Female Circumcision in The Context of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia

Authors

  • Debby Hasmita Wisnuwardhana University, Indonesia
  • Imam Ropii Wisnuwardhana University, Indonesia
  • Marsudi Dedi Putra Wisnuwardhana University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v8i1.8550

Keywords:

Female Circumcision; Legal Pluralism; Health Protection

Abstract

This study aims to analyze legal regulations on female circumcision practices from the perspective of legal pluralism in Indonesia and examine the legal implications for women's health protection. The research method used is normative legal research with a qualitative approach, based on the analysis of legislation, legal literature, and expert opinions. The approaches used include a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach to examine the relationship among state law, religious law, and customary law regarding the practice of female circumcision. The results of the study show that the Indonesian government, through Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning Health and Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, has prohibited female circumcision as a form of protection of human rights and reproductive health in accordance with WHO recommendations. However, the practice of female circumcision is still found in society in symbolic and traditional forms, which are considered part of the values of purity and moral obligations. Differences in perception between state law, religious law, and customary law pose challenges in policy implementation. Clarity on the legal boundaries between permissible and prohibited forms of circumcision is necessary to ensure the protection of women and children without causing social resistance in the community.

References

Affandi, M. (2019). Perlindungan Hak Kesehatan dalam Perspektif Konstitusi Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(2), 215–230.

Berg, R. C., & Underland, V. (2014). Immediate Health Consequences Of Female Genital Mutilation. Systematic Review.

Boyle, E. H. (2002). Female Genital Cutting: Cultural Conflict In The Global Community. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cedaw Committee. (1990). General Recommendation On Female Circumcision.

Committee On The Rights Of The Child. (2003). General Comment On Harmful Traditional Practices.

Government Of Indonesia. (2023). Law Number 17 Of 2023 Concerning Health.

Gruenbaum, E. (2001). The Female Circumcision Controversy: An Anthropological Perspective. University Of Pennsylvania Press.

Gunara, R., Prasetyo, B., & Lestari, D. (2024). Legal Culture Transformation and The Decline Of Harmful Traditional Practices In Indonesia. Indonesian Journal Of Socio-Legal Studies, 6(1), 45–60.

Hassan, R. (2023). Islamic Legal Perspectives On Female Genital Cutting. Islamic Law Review.

Hermanto, A. (2017). Khitan Perempuan Antara Tradisi dan Syari’ah. Kalam, 10(1).

Hikmalisa, & Iballa, D. K. M. (2022). Perspektif Kesetaraan dan Keadilan Gender Husein Muhammad Dalam Silang Pendapat Khitan Perempuan. Wahana Islamika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 8(1).

Istiqomah, S. N., Amin, D. R., Islam, S. S., Rosdiana, N. N., Rahmawati, N. S., Lestari, M. I., Agustin, S. M., & Nurhaeni, N. (2024). Wujudkan Perlindungan Perempuan dalam Tradisi Female Circumcision di Wilayah Kabupaten Bogor, Jawa Barat. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Nusantara, 5(2).

Januardi, T. (2022). Sebuah Perspektif Nawal El Saadawi: Khitan Perempuan Antara Syariat dan Adat. Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas, 2(3).

Johansen, R. E. B. (2013). Medicalization Of Female Genital Mutilation. Health Policy And Planning.

Karim, S. (2024). Human Rights Approach To Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation. Human Rights Quarterly.

Latifah, S. (2024). Professional Ethics Of Health Workers In Refusing Non-Therapeutic Medical Procedures. Jurnal Etika Kedokteran Indonesia, 8(1), 33–44.

Lavenia, M., & Widiastuti, W. (2025). Khitan Perempuan dalam Perspektif Medis, Hukum Islam, Dan Hukum Negara di Indonesia. Inovasi Hukum: Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 7(2).

Mackie, G. (1996). Ending Footbinding and Female Genital Cutting: A Convention Account. American Sociological Review.

Marcoes, L., Suadey, A., & Bashori, H. (2019). Perempuan dan Pluralisme. Lkis.

Marzuki, M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.

Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian Hukum. Prenadamedia Group.

Nugroho, T. (2022). Legal Pluralism and Religious Norms In Indonesia. Journal Of Law And Society.

Pratiwi, Y. D., & Widodo, H. (2016). Pengaturan Sunat Perempuan dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 3(2).

Putri, A. (2020). Legal Protection Against Female Genital Cutting In Indonesia. Indonesian Law Review.

Rahman, F. (2019). Female Circumcision Practice In Indonesia: Cultural and Religious Dimensions. Journal Of Indonesian Social Studies.

Rahmawati, E. S., & Maknun, L. (2019). Khitan Perempuan dalam Fatwa Mui No. 9a Tahun 2008 Dan Permenkes No. 6 Tahun 2014 Perspektif Maqashid Al-Syari’ah. Egalita, 12(2).

Rahmawati, F., & Maknun, L. (2019). Fatwa Mui Tentang Khitan Perempuan dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Kesehatan. Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 29(2), 241–258.

Reisel, D., & Creighton, S. (2015). Long-Term Health Consequences Of Female Genital Mutilation. Maturitas.

Sari, R. M. (2021). Potensi Perampasan Wilayah Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Mulawarman Law Review, 6(1), 1–14. Https://Doi.Org/10.30872/Mulrev.V6i1.506

Sugiyono. (2014). Educational Research Methods. Alfabeta Publisher.

Sugiyono. (2021). Qualitative, Quantitative, And R&D Research Methods. Alfabeta.

Sulahyuningsih, E., Daro, Y. A., & Safitri, A. (2021). Analisis Praktik Tradisional Berbahaya: Sunat Perempuan Sebagai Indikator Kesetaraan Gender dalam Perspektif Agama, Transkultural, dan Kesehatan Reproduksi di Kabupaten Sumbawa. Jurnal Ilmu Keperawatan Dan Kebidanan, 12(1).

Sulahyuningsih, E., Kurniawan, D., & Putri, S. (2021). Regulatory Ambiguity and Enforcement Challenges In Prohibiting Female Genital Cutting In Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia, 5(2), 101–115.

Sulistyawati, A., & Hakim, L. (2022). State Policy On The Prohibition Of Female Genital Mutilation In Indonesia. Jurnal Ham Indonesia, 13(2), 89–104.

Unfpa. (2020). Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation: Progress Report.

Unicef. (2021). Female Genital Mutilation: Statistical Overview and Trends.

United Nations. (1979). Convention On The Elimination Of All Forms Of Discrimination Against Women (Cedaw).

United Nations General Assembly. (2012). Resolution On The Elimination Of Female Genital Mutilation.

Widodo, H. (2024). Policy Reform On Female Circumcision In Southeast Asia. Asian Legal Studies.

World Health Organization. (2022). Global Tuberculosis Report. World Health Organization.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

Hasmita, D., Ropii, I., & Putra, M. D. (2026). Legal Analysis of Female Circumcision in The Context of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 8(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v8i1.8550

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Debby Hasmita, Imam Ropii, Marsudi Dedi Putra

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright:

An author who publishes in Al-Manhaj agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

License:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.