Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penerapan Asas Pari Passu Prorata Partij Terhadap Kreditor Konkuren Dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Aug 30, 2023
https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v3i2.3347
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Hendri Jayadi
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Abstract

The principle of pari passu prorata partij is applied in bankruptcy cases involving several creditors and debtors. This encourages a study of legal protection for the application of the pari passu prorata partij principle to concurrent creditors in the perspective of civil procedural law. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which the principle of pari passu prorata partij provides legal protection for concurrent creditors. The research method used is a qualitative type of literature study. The results of this study indicate that the principle of pari passu prorata partij provides a solution that the provision of repayment to creditors is given jointly without anyone taking precedence, especially concurrent creditors who do not have privileges in accordance with the provisions of the law. Debt repayments to creditors are also scaled according to their relative debt. According to Article 37 of Law no. 37 of 2004, if the debtor's assets are not sufficient to cover his debts, then the curator will make more efforts by filing an actio paulina case. It can be concluded that the principle of pari passu prorata partij can provide solutions and legal protection for bankruptcy problems involving both parties.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright:

An author who publishes in Al-Manhaj agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

License:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Jayadi, H. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penerapan Asas Pari Passu Prorata Partij Terhadap Kreditor Konkuren Dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 3(2), 277-282. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v3i2.3347

References

Anisah, L. (2018). Akibat Kepailitan terhadap hak retensi. Varia Hukum, 39(30), 1–17. Varia Hukum.
Arini, D. U., & Suryadi, R. (2023). The Influence of Motivation and Job Competence on Employee Performance in the Marketing of ABC Insurance. Journal of World Science, 2(6), 812–816.
Bruce Anzward, D., & Wulan, S. E. R. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Konkuren (Tanpa Jaminan) Dalam Perkara Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) PT. Asmin Koalindo Tuhup. Journal de Facto, 5(2), 144–161.
Disemadi, H. S., & Gomes, D. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Konkuren Dalam Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 123–134.
Hamdi, H., Sulaiman, S., & Afrizal, T. Y. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Terhadap Pelunasan Piutang Dari Harta Pailit. JURNAL ILMIAH MAHASISWA FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS MALIKUSSALEH, 1(1).
Hidayat, M. T. (2015). Penyelesaian Sengketa Akibat Kesalahan Kurator dari Berkurangnya Harta Debitur Pailit yang Merugikan Pihak Kreditur dalam Kepailitan. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 7(14).
Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang RI nomor 37 tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Cipta Jaya.
Kamahayani, M., & Margono, S. (2020). Penerapan Asas Pari Passu Pro Rata Parte Terhadap Pemberesan Harta Pailit PT Dhiva Inter Sarana dan Richard Setiawan (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor: 169 PK/Pdt. Sus-Pailit/2017). Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 3(1), 71–91.
Nugrahani, F., & Hum, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Solo: Cakra Books, 1(1), 3–4.
Palar, V. C. E., & Mekka, M. F. (2023). Wanprestasi Terhadap Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Rumah Susun yang Dibuat oleh Notaris. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 35–48.
Priyatna, S. A. (2022). Hukum Kepailitan Dan Problematikanya Di Indonesia. Kementerian Keuangan RI. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kanwil-balinusra/baca-artikel/15542/HUKUM-KEPAILITAN-DAN-PROBLEMATIKANYA-DI-INDONESIA.html#:~:text=Selanjutnya Pasal 1132 Kitab Undang,besar kecilnya piutang masing-masing%2C
Putra, F. M. K. (2013). Benturan Antara Kreditor Privilege Dengan Kreditor Preferen Pemegang Hipotek Kapal Laut Terkait Adanya Force Majeure. Perspektif, 18(1), 32–45.
Ramadhani, J. A. (2023). Factors Influencing the Role of Agricultural Intentions in The Empowerment of Ornamental Plant Farming Group in Lubuk Minturun Village. International Journal of Social Health, 2(2), 56–60.
Septayana, I. P. A., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2022). Kedudukan Hukum Pemegang Hak Preferen dan Retensi terhadap Perusahaan PT Bukit Inn Resort yang Dinyatakan Pailit. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 3(1), 215–219.
Shubhan, M. H. (2021). Cara Bagi Harta Pailit Menurut Asas Pari Passu Prorata Parte. Hukum Online.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/cara-bagi-harta-pailit-menurut-asas-ipari-passu-prorata-parte-i-lt6170bf63c34bc/
Sinaga, N. A., & Sulisrudatin, N. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan dan Permasalahannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 7(1).
Slamet, S. R. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum dan Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis Dalam Hal Terjadi Kepailitan Terhadap Debitor. Forum Ilmiah, 13(1).
Wirapatih, R. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan Fidusia Berupa Hewan Ternak. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 34–48.