Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Ahli Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the validity of expert testimony based on Indonesian civil procedural law in Indonesian civil law. The method used is descriptive and qualitative. The data collection technique is a documentary study. The data used is secondary data in the form of documentation of the regulations used. The results of the study show that the position of an expert can be part of the witnesses who provide information in the context of evidence. Provisions regarding an expert witness are explained in Article 154 HIR. This makes the role of an expert important in explaining the problem under discussion. In terms of strength in the context of civil law, an expert has been screened through two commitments, namely a moral commitment (through an oath or promise) and also a professional commitment (which includes the expert's technical expertise through education or experience). In addition, the strength of an expert's statement is also higher because it is tested by the Public Prosecutor (Prosecutor) and also legal counsel.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Awilda, A., Ismansyah, I., Zurnetti, A., & Muchtar, H. (2023). DAMPAK PEMERIKSAAN SETEMPAT TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS DALAM KASUS DUGAAN TINDAK PIDANA CABUL DIPANDANG DARI ASPEK KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(2), 346–368.
Azis, A. P. (2019). Kekosongan Hukum Acara Dan Krisis Access To Justice Dalam Kasus-Kasus Pemberhentian Kepala Daerah/Wakil Kepala Daerah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(1), 1–43.
Erich, E., Maryano, M., & Martanti, Y. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Itikad Baik Penerima Kuasa yang Bertindak di Luar Kuasa yang Dibuat Secara Autentik. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 42–52.
Juanda, E. (2016). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Perdata Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 4(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v4i1.409
Kadek Dedy Prawirajaya, R., Purwanto, H., & Titasari, C. P. (2023). Sistem Religi dan Makna pada Relief Yeh Pulu di Kabupaten Gianyar, Bali. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(1), 56–76.
Kurniawati, D., Parman, L., & Ufran, U. (2022). Perlindungan Hak Korban Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Penuntutan Perkara Pidana. Indonesia Berdaya, 3(4), 1051–1064.
Nasarudin, A. N., & Arafat, M. R. (2023). Peranan Dan Kedudukan Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Perkosaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(14), 131–142.
Ningsih, E. S. (2020). Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Perdata. Universitas Islam Riau.
PANJAITAN, P. (2022). KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERHADAPANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANAASUSILA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI LUBUK PAKAM NO. 40/PID. SUS-ANAK/2018/PN. LBP).
Prakoso, G. C. (2020). Pengembangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekrutmen Karyawan Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Dalam ERP ODOO. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Putri Anjulika, A. (2023). Kewajiban Notaris dalam Memberikan Jasa Hukum tanpa Honorarium Kepada Orang yang tidak Mampu. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 2(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v2i1.1920
Rivhaldha, T. R. (2022). Analysis of Decisions Related to Child Custody Due to Parental Divorce (Decision Study Number: 75/Pdt. G/2021/Pn Smr). Journal of World Science, 1(4), 212–222.
Sari, C. D. (2019). Dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam penjatuhan putusan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pencucian uang (Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pangkalpinang Nomor: 67/PID. B/2014/PN. PKP). Universitas Bangka Belitung.
Solihin, S., & Markoni, M. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja Pasca Pemberlakuan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Locus Penelitian Dan Pengabdian, 1(9), 717–737.
SUDIRMAN, S. (2023). HAK DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN. Dinamika Hukum, 14(2).
Triningsih, A. (2015). Pengadilan Sebagai Lembaga Penegakan Hukum (Perspektif Civil Law Dan Common Law). Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(1), 134–153.