The Role of Legal Politics in the Recovery of State Financial Losses Due to Corruption
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Corruption crimes have caused very large losses to the state and can have an impact on the emergence of various crises in various fields such as social life, nationhood, and statehood. Therefore, a legal enforcement method is needed through the establishment of a special body that has broad, independent, and free authority from any power in efforts to eradicate corruption crimes that are carried out maximally, intensively, effectively, professionally, and continuously. This paper uses a normative juridical research method through an approach based on basic legal materials by examining theories, concepts, legal principles, and regulations. Research using a normative juridical method is legal research conducted by examining literature or secondary data as a basis for research by tracing regulations and literature related to the issues being studied. To solve the legal problems that have been formulated and get their answers, this research uses four problem-solving approach models, namely the statutory approach, comparative approach, historical approach, and conceptual approach. The results of this study are various changes and reviews of anti-corruption laws that are legal policies applied by Indonesia as efforts towards legal reform for the better. Because corruption has harmed state finances, efforts to recover state financial losses are carried out through criminal, civil, and administrative channels.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
License:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Achmad, K. (2021). Penegakan Hukum Atas Kerugian Keuangan Negara Melalui Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.36418/jiss.v1i2.15
Afiatul Kharisma, Z., Putra, B. B. W., & Hidayah, M. N. (2021). Responsibility Model For Criminal Acts Of Corruption By Bumn As A Corporation: Between Corporate Responsibility And Management. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 2(12). https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v2i12.162
Annur, C. M. (2021). Kerugian Negara Akibat Korupsi Capai Rp 26,8 Triliun pada Semester 1 2021. databooks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/09/13/icw-kerugian-negara-akibat-korupsi-capai-rp-268-triliun-pada-semester-1-2021
Ansori, L. (2017). Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Yuridis, 4(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35586/.v4i2.244
Astuti, I. (2014). Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Forum Ilmu Sosial, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/fis.v41i2.5384
Budiharjo, A. (2001). Perilaku Menyimpang Budaya Korupsi. Raja Grafindo Press.
Fajri, K., Alghazali, M. S. D., & Fadhilah, A. (2022). Determination Of State Financial Loss Recovery Effort Through The Role Of The Prosecutors Against The Appropriation Assets Of Criminal Acts Of Corruption. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(7). https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/
Firman, W., & Mahardika. (2019). ). Kajian Yuridis Fungsi Pencegahan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Secara Elektronik Di Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 1(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2925
Fransiska Sianipar, A., Zulyadi, R., & Siregar, T. (2023). Law Enforcement of the Crime of Corruption the Cost of Collecting Land and Building Tax (PBB) in the Plantation Sector in the South Labuhan Batu Regency Government. Jurnal of Educaion, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v5i3.1591.
Heri, J. S., & Chandra, T. Y. (2021). Urgensi Pemulihan Kerugia Keuangan Negara Melaui Ti dakan Pemblokiran DA. 5(2). https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v5i2.1033
Hiariej, E. (2019). Konvensi PBB Melawan Korupsi Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.43968
Hidayatullah, Triyono, A., & Sumarja, F. (2023). Akuntan Publik: Kewenangan Menghitung Kerugian Keuangan Negara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. 5(1). https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2074
Josua, N., Suganda, A., & Makbul, A. (2021). Upaya Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Terpidana Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 15(1). https://doi.org/https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/437041-none-fb36eb8c.pdf
Kartika, F. ., & Bambang, I. . (2020). Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Keterkaitannya Dengan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia (Khususnya Provinsi Sumatera Utara). Jurnal Lex Justitia, 2(1).
Kusnandar, V. (2023). “ICW: Kerugian Negara Akibat Korupsi RP62,9 Triliun pada tahun 2021”. 31 Oktober. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/05/23/icw-kerugian-negara-akibat-korupsi-rp629-triliun-pada-2021
Latifah, M. (2015). Urgensi Pembentukan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Negara Hukum, 6(1).
Likaja, J. (2015). Memaknai Hukum Negara (Law Through State) dalam Bingkai Negara Hukum (Rechtstaat). Hasanuddin Law Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1i1.41
Mahfud MD, M. (2001). Politik Hukum di Indonesia (2 ed.). LP3ES.
Marzuki, H. L. (2006). Kekuatan Mengikat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Undang-Undang. Jurnal Legislasi, 3(1).
Marzuki, P. (2018). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.
MD, M. M. (2019). Capaian dan Proyeksi Hukum di Indonesia (I). Refleksi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Terhadap Kondisi Hukum Di Indonesia.
Mertokusumo, S. (1993). Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Kebebasan.
Muhtar, M. (2019). Model Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Lembaga Penegak Hukum. Tinjauan Hukum Jambura, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33756/jalrev.v1i1.1988
Nasution, K. (2010). Buku Lengkap Lembaga-Lembaga Negara. Saufa.
Pekuwaly, U. (2012). Potret Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi Tahun 1998. Masalah-masalah hukum, 4(1).
Puteri, K. S., Erlangga, Mulyono, & Fauziah. (2023). Efektifitas Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan negara dalam perkara korupsi melalui pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Hukum Jurisdistice, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.34005/jhj.v5i2
Rio, R. S. (n.d.). Penegakan Hukum Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016. https://journal.uii.ac.id/Lex-Renaissance/article/view/13603/pdf.
Risnaini, M. (2014). Kesinambungan Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 3(3). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i3.28
Simamora, J. (2014). Tafsir Makna Negara Hukum dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(3). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.3.318
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat). Rajawali Press.
Soemitro, R. H. (1994). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia.
Sugiarto, T. (2013). Peranan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 28(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v18i2.1123
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. (n.d.).
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. (n.d.).