ACCREDITATION
Retraction And Correction
Retraction and Correction Policy
Policy Statement
Retraction
-
Unreliable Findings: Clear evidence shows that the findings are unreliable due to research misconduct (including, but not limited to, data fabrication, falsification, or citation manipulation) or as a result of honest but critical errors (e.g., major miscalculations or methodological flaws).
-
Redundant/Duplicate Publication: Substantial portions of the work have been previously published elsewhere without appropriate disclosure, permission, or justification.
-
Ethical Violations: Serious ethical breaches, including plagiarism, misuse of confidential peer-review material, or inappropriate authorship practices.
-
Potential grounds for retraction are brought to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief or Managing Editor.
-
The editor(s) conduct an initial assessment following relevant COPE flowcharts, including providing the author(s) with an opportunity to respond.
-
Where necessary, the findings are reviewed in consultation with the Editorial Board or an ethics committee to ensure a fair decision-making process.
-
The final decision regarding retraction is formally communicated to the author(s) and, where appropriate, to the relevant institutional bodies.
Article Correction
-
A limited portion of the article contains inaccurate or misleading information arising from an honest error that does not invalidate the overall findings.
-
Errors in authorship or contributorship, such as the omission of a qualified author or the inclusion of an individual who does not meet authorship criteria.
-
Publisher Correction (Erratum): Issued to correct significant errors introduced during the production or publication process.
-
Author Correction (Corrigendum): Issued to address significant errors made by the author(s) that affect the interpretation of the work.
-
Addendum: Issued to provide additional information or clarification that complements the original article without altering its core conclusions.

.png)




