Tinjauan Yuridis Kasus Persamaan Merek Poskota dan Poskotaco (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 39 /Pdt.Sus-Merek/2022/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published May 1, 2023
https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2494
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Arina Nafida Rahma
Universitas Diponegoro
Siti Mahmudah

Abstract

Brand infringement case between POSKOTA owned by PT. Media Anatarkota Jaya and POSKOTACO owned by PT. Millennial Voice Media is listed in Court Decision No. 39 /Pdt.Sus-Merek/2022/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst, PT. Media Anatarkota Jaya (POSKOTA) as the aggrieved party sued for the cancellation of the PT. Media Suara Millenial (POSKOTACO). The object of the case in the decision is trademark infringement which is the same. The panel of judges granted the plaintiff's claim and ordered the defendant to cross out and cancel the registration of the POSKOTACO Mark. The purpose of this research is to find out the legal protection for trademarks that have been registered and the legal consequences of trademark equality disputes and to analyze the Decision of Court Decision No. 39 /Pdt.Sus-Merek/2022/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst. The approach method in this journal research is normative juridical by studying the Trademark Law and relating it to practice in the field. The results of this journal writing research are that brand owners who feel aggrieved due to parties who commit equality violations can apply for trademark cancellation based on the reasons in Articles 20 and 21 of Law Number 20 of 2016 Concerning Marks and Geographical Indications. The legal basis for the judge's consideration in deciding the trademark cancellation case is based on Article 76 jo. Article 20, Article 21 of Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and other relevant regulations.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright:

An author who publishes in Al-Manhaj agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

License:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

You are free to:

  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rahma, A., & Mahmudah, S. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Kasus Persamaan Merek Poskota dan Poskotaco (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 39 /Pdt.Sus-Merek/2022/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst). AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 567-578. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2494

References

Ali, Z. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Aspriola, V., & Israd, A. C. (2022). Pelanggaran Merek Dagang Dalam Kasus Persamaan Nama Merek Pada Geprek Bensu Menurut UU No. 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Journal Evidence Of Law, 1(3), 31–41.
Charles Yeremia Far-Far, Sentot P.Sigito,S.H.,M.Hum, M.Zairul Alam,S.H., M. . (2013). TINJAUAN YURIDIS PEMBATALAN MEREK DAGANG TERDAFTAR TERKAIT PRINSIP ITIKAD BAIK (GOOD FAITH) DALAM SISTEM PENDAFTARAN MEREK (studi putusan nomor 356 K/Pdt.Sus-HaKI/2013). Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 1–22.
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.
Jacklin Mangowal. (2017). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM MEREK TERKENAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG MEREK. Lex Et Societatis, V(9), 22–29.
Joshua Jurgen Sumanti, Merry Elisabeth Kalalo, R. M. (2018). Akibat Hukum Pemakaian Merek Yang Memiliki Persamaan Pada Pokoknya Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis. Lex Privatum, IX(8), 1–15. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/download/40371/36155
Moleong, L. J. (1996). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.
Prasomya, D. A., & Santoso, B. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Pembatalan Merek Dagang Terkait Prinsip Itikad Baik Dalam Sistem Pendaftaran Merek. Notarius, 15(2), 660–675. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v15i2.27522
Putri, S. A. S. (2019). UNSUR PERSAMAAN PADA POKOKNYA DALAM PENDAFTARAN TENTANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS DAN PELANGGARAN TERHADAP MEREK TERKENAL Sendy Anugrah Sutisna Putra Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Bandung 1 . Latar Belakang Masalah Me. AKTUALITA, 2(1).
Putu Eka Krisna Sanjaya, P. E. K. S. (2018). Perlindungan hukum terhadap hak merek terkenal di indonesia *. Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 1–12.
Satjipto Raharjo. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
sudarsono. (2018). Harmonisasi penyelesaian sengketa merek di pengadilan tata usaha negara dan pengadilan niaga. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 7(20), 49–65.