Differences in Islamic Culture History Learning Outcomes Between Active Learning Strategies Team Quiz Type and Practice Private Madrasah Aliyah Students
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Researchers have observed low student learning outcomes in the field of Islamic Cultural History, which cannot be separated from the influence of various factors in learning activities. One of the factors influencing learning outcomes is the teacher's teaching method, which is less appealing, causing students to become bored and pay less attention to the teacher's lessons. A quasi-experimental design model with a 1-way analysis of variance (Anava) and a 2 x 1 design is used in this study. Then, using population and samples, the team quiz strategy and practice rehearsal pairs strategy will be compared as independent variables and student learning outcomes as the dependent variable. There were significant differences in the learning outcomes of Islamic Cultural History when taught using a team quiz active learning strategy versus a practice rehearsal pairs active learning strategy. This is demonstrated by the statistical calculation of the t-test, which yields the value of tcount = 3.00 and the price of ttable = 2.0231. The average learning outcomes of Islamic Cultural History taught with the team quiz strategy = 17.85 were higher than the average learning outcomes of Islamic Cultural History taught with the practice rehearsal pairs strategy = 16.35.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.