Development of Collaborative Peer-Based Authentic Assessment in Physics Learning
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This study presents findings on developing collaborative peer-based authentic assessment in physics learning. This type of research is qualitative descriptive. The source of research data with secondary data is derived from data from SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Klaten. The data analysis involves collecting, organizing, interpreting, and drawing conclusions from qualitative research data. The research results show that the PCAA model is an assessment of the learning process that can improve higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) and can be applied to improve the quality of education. Collaborative skills, peer assessment, and authentic assessment can improve the quality of education. The Peer Collaborative-Authentic Assessment (PCAA) model assesses Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) learning. HOTS learning can improve education quality, so that the PCAA model can improve the quality of education.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.