Memahami Al-Ghazzali: Jawaban atas Kritik Skeptisisme dan Inkonsistensi

Understanding Al-Ghazali: Answers to the Critique of Skepticism and Inconsistency

Authors

  • Kurniawan Dwi Saputra Faculty of Islamic Studies, Indonesian Islamic University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37680/adabiya.v17i2.2404

Keywords:

Al-Ghazali, critique, inconsistency, skepticism

Abstract

Al-Ghazali is one of the greatest Muslim scholars. He is known as Hujjah al-Islām because of his success in defending Islamic orthodoxy in the face of heretical groups. However, Al-Ghazali is also not free from controversy. Among these criticisms is that Al-Ghazali had experienced a period of skepticism and inconsistent thinking. This research attempts to analyze Al-Ghazali's works and secondary books that explain Al-Ghazali's thoughts. This study uses a qualitative approach to the type of literature research. The topic of this research is the controversy surrounding skepticism and accusations of inconsistency in Al-Ghazali's thought. The steps in this study include topic selection, information exploration, focus determination, data collection, data presentation, and report preparation. The results of this study suggest that Al-Ghazali's skeptical period was not a problem because it happened in a short time and he did not produce any papers. The problem of Al-Ghazali's inconsistency arises because of the many works attributed to him but not actually Al-Ghazali's work or because of the different readers intended by Al-Ghazali in his different books, as stated by Dunya. In conclusion, this study argues that a comprehensive reading of Al-Ghazali's work is needed to provide a complete picture of Al-Ghazali's figure and the extent to which his works are devoted.

References

Adlini, Miza Nina, dan Anisya Hanifa Dinda. “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka.” Edumaspul Jurnal Pendidikan 6, no. 1 (2022): 974–80.

Al-Qaraḍawī, Yusuf. Al-Imām al-Ghazzālī Bayna Mādiḥīhi wa Nāqidīhi. Beyrut: Muassasah al-Risālah, 1994.

Arroisi, Jarman. “Bahagia Perspektif Al-Ghazali.” Journal KALIMAH 17, no. 1 (2019): 85–99.

Burhanuddin. “Membangun Pola Komunikasi Dakwah sebagai Alternatif Mencegah Sikap Intoleransi Beragama.” Dakwah: Jurnal Kajian Dakwah dan Kemasyarakatan 21, no. 1 (2017): 19–42.

Corbin, Henry. History Of Islamic Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870082.

Dallal, Ahmad. “Ghazālī and the Perils of Interpretation.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 122, no. 4 (2002): 773. https://doi.org/10.2307/3217616.

Dunyā, Sulaymān. al-Haqīqah fī Naẓr al-Ghazalī. 5 ed. Kairo: Dār al-Ma’ārif, 1994.

———. Tahāfut al-Falāsifah li al-Imām al-Ghazzālī Tahqīq wa Taqdīm. Kairo: Dār al-Ma’ārif, 2007.

Fakhry, Majid. A History of Islamic Philosophy. 3 ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.

H.L Beck, dan N J.G. Kaptein. Pandangan Barat Terhadap Literatur, Hukum, Filosofi, Teologi dan Mistik Tradisi Islam. Jakarta: INIS, 1988.

Imran. “Pola Komunikasi Dakwah Imam Al-Ghazali dalam Kitab Ayyuha Al-Waladu.” Jurnal Al-Nasyr 2, no. 2 (2014): 189–208.

Inah, Ety Nur. “Peranan Komunikasi Dalam Pendidikan.” Jurnal Al-Ta’dib 6, no. 1 (2013): 76–88.

’Irāqī, ’Āṭif. Tajdīd fî al-Madzāhib al-Falsafiyah wa al-Kalāmiyah. Kairo: Dār al-Ma’ārif, 1993.

K Hitti, Philip. History of the Arabs: From the Earliest Time to the Present. London: McMillan Publisher, 1984.

Leaman, Oliver. An Introduction to Classical Islamic Philosophy. An Introduction to Classical Islamic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139164719.

———. History of Islamic Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2008.

Madjid, Nurcholis. Islam, Kemodernan dan Keindonesiaan. Bandung: Mizan, 1987.

Maḥmūd, Abd al-Ḥalim. Qaḍiyyah al-Tasawwuf: al-Munqidz min al-Ḍalāl. Kairo: Dār al-Ma’ārif, 2008.

Maḥmūd, Abd al-Ḥalim. Qaḍiyyah al-Tasawwuf: al-Munqidz min al-Ḍalāl. Kairo: Dār al-Ma’ārif, 2008.

Mashar, Aly. “TASAWUF : Sejarah, Madzhab, dan Inti Ajarannya.” Al-A’raf : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat 12, no. 1 (2015): 97–117. https://doi.org/10.22515/AJPIF.V12I1.1186.

Montgomery Watt, W. Muslim Intellectual; A Study of al-Ghazali. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1971.

Mubarok, Tanzia. “’Variation’ in Approach to Human Psyche: Explorong Al-Ghazali’s Influence on Freudian Psychoanalisis.” Comparative Literature 6, no. 1 (2022): 64–79.

Mubasyaroh. “Dakwah dan Komunikasi (Studi Penggunaan Media Massa Dalam Dakwah).” AT-TABSYIR: Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam 4, no. 1 (2016): 95–114.

Nisa, Pia Khoirutun. “Komunikasi Dakwah Imam Al-Ghazali Dalam Kitab Iḥyā‘Ulumiddn.” Wardah 19, no. 2 (2018): 249–66.

O Ruddle - Miyamoto, Akira. “Regarding Doubt and Certainty in al-Ghazālī’s Deliverance from Error and Descartes’ Meditations.” Philosophy East and West 67, no. 1 (2017): 76–160. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2017.0011.

Paturrochmah, Hany. “Rasional Emotif Behavior Therapy (REBT) Islam Dalam Menumbuhkan Sikap Mental Positif.” Konseling Edukasi : Journal Of Guidance and Counseling 4, no. 2 (2020): 200–217. https://doi.org/10.21043/KONSELING.V4I2.8472.

Putra, Ary Antony. “Konsep Pendidikan Agama Islam Perspektif Imam Al-Ghazali.” Jurnal Al-Thariqah 1, no. 1 (2016): 42–54.

Rayan, Sobhi. “Al-Ghazali’s Method of Doubt.” Middle East Studies Association Bulletin 38, no. 2 (2004): 73–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026318400046939.

Richmond, Joel. “Al-Ghazali on Experiental Knowledge and Imaginal Mediation.” Islam and Christian-Muslim Relation 33, no. 1 (2022): 1–17.

Sahri. “Political Thought of Al-Ghazali on Imamah: Debate between Theocracy and Democacy.” HTS Theologiese Studies/Theological Studies 77, no. 3 (2021): 1–8.

Sari, Milya, dan Asmendri. “Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.” Natural Science: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang IPA dan Pendidikan IPA 6, no. 1 (2020): 41–53.

Setiawan, Eko. “Konsep Pendidikan Akhlak Anak Perspektif Imam Al-Ghazali.” Jurnal Kependidikan 5, no. 1 (2017): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v5i1.1252.

Sofrianisda, dan M Arrafie Abduh. “Pengaruh Tasawuf al-Ghazali dalam Islam dan Kristen.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 25, no. 1 (2017): 69–82.

Suryadarma, Yoke, dan Ahmad Hifdzil Haq. “Pendidikan Akhlak menurut Imam Al-Ghazali.” Jurnal At-Ta’dib 10, no. 2 (2015): 361–81.

Wanto, Alfi Haris. “Strategi Pemerintah Kota Malang dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Konsep Smart City.” Journal of Public Sector Innovator 2, no. 1 (2017): 39–43.

Wirman, Eka Putra. “Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali: Dialektika Logika dan Intuisi.” Tajdid: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman dan Ushuluddin 17, no. 2 (2019): 212–20.

Zaini, Ahmad. “Pemikiran Tasawuf Imam Al-Ghazali.” Esoterik: Jurnal Akhlak dan Tasawuf 2, no. 1 (2016): 146–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/esoterik.v2i1.1902.

Published

2022-12-14

How to Cite

Saputra, K. D. (2022). Memahami Al-Ghazzali: Jawaban atas Kritik Skeptisisme dan Inkonsistensi: Understanding Al-Ghazali: Answers to the Critique of Skepticism and Inconsistency. Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan Dan Keagamaan, 17(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.37680/adabiya.v17i2.2404