Implementation of a Buddhist Religious Leadership Communication Model Based on Dhamma Ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v8i3.10899Keywords:
Buddhist Leadership, Dhamma Ethics, Internal Harmony, Leadership CommunicationAbstract
This study aims to describe the implementation of a Buddhist religious leadership communication model based on Dhamma ethics in Central Java Province, Indonesia. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed to explore communication practices, ethical principles, and leadership interactions within Buddhist communities. Data were collected from January to July 2026 through semi-structured interviews and direct observations involving Buddhist leaders, government officials, and managers of monasteries and Buddhist temples (vihara) across several regencies and cities in Central Java. Relevant organizational records and activity reports were also used as documentary sources. Data were analyzed through data familiarization, coding, categorization, theme development, interpretation, and conclusion drawing/verification, while triangulation was conducted across interview, observational, and documentary evidence. The results identified six recurring forms of Dhamma-based leadership communication: participatory communication in Dhamma activities, two-way communication, respect for community opinions and input, ethical communication and rejection of misinformation, mutual respect, and attentive listening. These practices reflect Dhamma values such as sammā vācā, mettā, karuṇā, and paññā and position religious leaders as facilitators of dialogue, ethical role models, and attentive listeners rather than solely as transmitters of religious teachings. The study concludes that Dhamma ethics provides a practical foundation for participatory, dialogical, and ethically responsible leadership communication that supports mutual respect, trust, and internal harmony within Buddhist communities in Central Java.
References
Abdul Rahman, A., Mohd Radzi, N. A., & Ismail, K. (2022). Konsep ‘Pertuturan Yang Betul’ dari Perspektif Buddhism: Satu Tinjauan awal [The concept of ‘Right Speech’ from the Perspective of Buddhism: A Preliminary Overview]. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 27(2), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol27no2.437
Abu Bakar, H., & Connaughton, S. L. (2022). Ethical Leadership, Perceived Leader–Member Ethical Communication and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Development and validation of a multilevel model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2021-0356
Achmadi, Hendryadi, Siregar, A. O., & Hadmar, A. S. (2022). How Can a leader’s Humility Enhance Civility Climate and Employee Voice in a Competitive Environment? Journal of Management Development, 41(4), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2021-0297
Aftab, J., Sarwar, H., Kiran, A., Qureshi, M. I., Ishaq, M. I., Ambreen, S., & Kayani, A. J. (2023). Ethical Leadership, Workplace Spirituality, and Job Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(12), 5880–5899. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2021-1121
Agung, D. A. G., Nasih, A. M., Sumarmi, Idris, & Kurniawan, B. (2024). Local Wisdom as a Model of Interfaith Communication in Creating Religious Harmony in Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100827
Astuti, D., & Kabri. (2024). Kajian kepemimpinan Buddha. Dharmasmrti: Jurnal Ilmu Agama Dan Kebudayaan, 24(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.32795/ds.v24i1.5917
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Burmansah, Rugaiyah, R., Mukhtar, M., Nabilah, S., Ripki, A. J. H., & Fatayan, A. (2020). Mindful Leadership: The Ability of the Leader to Develop Compassion and Attention without Judgment—A Case Study of the Leader of a Buddhist Higher Education Institute. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.51
Canavesi, A., & Minelli, E. (2022). Servant leadership: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Analysis. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 34(3), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09381-3
Ceylan, G., Anderson, I. A., & Wood, W. (2023). Sharing of Misinformation is Habitual, Not Just Lazy or Biased. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(4), e2216614120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216614120
Chen, Y. R. R., Hung-Baesecke, C. J. F., & Chen, X. (2020). Moving Forward the Dialogic Theory of Public Relations: Concepts, Methods and Applications of Organization-Public Dialogue. Public Relations Review, 46(1), 101878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101878
Gautama, S. A., Gelgel, I. P., & Wirawan, I. G. B. (2024). Transformasi Pengetahuan Komunikasi Religius Penyuluh Agama Buddha di Bandar Lampung: Sebuah Kajian Empiris. Journal Media Public Relations, 4(2), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.37090/jmp.v4i2.1760
Gold, J. C. (2023). The coherence of Buddhism: Relativism, Ethics, and Psychology. Journal of Religious Ethics, 51(2), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12433
Hafenbrack, A. C., Cameron, L. D., Spreitzer, G. M., Zhang, C., Noval, L. J., & Shaffakat, S. (2020). Helping People by Being in the Present: Mindfulness Increases Prosocial Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 159, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.08.005
Heisterkamp, B. L. (2022). Why this now? Theorizing Mindfulness and Communication. Western Journal of Communication, 86(2), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2021.2018484
Hidalgo, J. S. (2022). Buddhist Ethics as a Path: A Defense of Normative Gradualism. Philosophy East and West, 72(2), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2022.0044
Kent, M. L., & Lane, A. (2021). Two-Way Communication, Symmetry, Negative Spaces, and Dialogue. Public Relations Review, 47(2), 102014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102014
Leach, R. B., & Wong, T. (2024). Refreshing the Positive: Bridging Positive Organizational Communication and Critical Scholarship with Buddhist Philosophies. Communication Theory, 34(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad015
Lee, S. E., & Dahinten, V. S. (2021). Psychological Safety as a Mediator of the relationship Between Inclusive Leadership and Nurse Voice Behaviors and Error Reporting. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 53(6), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12689
Leesmidt, K., & Jarunratanakul, P. (2022). Buddhist Compassionate Leadership and Employee Psychological Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Trust in Leader on Thai Financial Services Employees. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(3), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.3.09
Liu, W., Xu, W. W., & Tsai, J.-Y. J. (2020). Developing a Multi-Level Organization-Public Dialogic Communication Framework to Assess Social Media-Mediated Disaster Communication and Engagement Outcomes. Public Relations Review, 46(4), 101949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101949
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Paramita, S., Wulan, C. A., Widiyanto, Saputri, V. A. M., Avitasari, I., & Yudhawati, I. (2025). The influence of Right Speech (Sammā Vācā) on the Communication Ethics of Buddhist Students on Social Media. Journal of Communication, Religious, and Social Sciences, 3(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.60046/jocrss.v3i1.217
Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Shifting Attention to Accuracy Can Reduce Misinformation Online. Nature, 592(7855), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2022). Accuracy Prompts are a Replicable and Generalizable Approach for Reducing the Spread of Misinformation. Nature Communications, 13, 2333. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30073-5
Pramita, I., Saputri, V. A. M., Dharmattana, S., Seneru, W., Gautama, S. A., Burmansah, & Julianti, M. (2024). Mindfulness in Communication, Tolerance, and Harmony in Buddhist Community living: A Study of Religious Moderation on Education and Communication. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 8(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v8i2.95133
Rapiadi, Wibawa, R., Yudhawati, I., Widiyanto, & Gautama, S. A. (2023). The Role of Spiritual Leaders in Building Socio-Cultural Communication Networks in the Buddhayana Community of Lampung Province. Journal of Communication, Religious, and Social Sciences, 1(2), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.60046/jocrss.v1i2.42
Ridho, A., Rahmat, S., Masri, M. S. H., & Warsah, I. (2023). Synergizing Stakeholders’ Communication for Religious Harmony in Indonesia. Islamic Communication Journal, 8(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2023.8.1.13626
Rodloytuk, P. (2021). Engaged Buddhist Community as a Human Rights Response: A case of Buddhist Participatory Communication. Asian Review, 34(2), 16–40. https://doi.org/10.58837/Chula.ARV.34.2.2
Sansó, N., Leiva, J. P., Vidal-Blanco, G., Galiana, L., & West, M. (2022). The Measurement of Compassionate Leadership: Adaptation and Spanish Validation of the Compassionate Leadership Self-Reported Scale. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 36(4), 1165–1179. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13079
Selwen, P. (2021). Analisis Kepemimpinan Buddhis dalam Menata Lembaga Keagamaan Buddha (Studi Kasus pada Organisasi Buddhis di Medan). Jurnal Pendidikan Buddha Dan Isu Sosial Kontemporer, 3(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.56325/jpbisk.v3i1.10
Shofwan, A. M. (2021). Etika Ajaran Agama Buddha untuk Membangun Bangsa dan Negara dalam Kebersamaan. Jurnal Agama Buddha dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 7(2), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.53565/abip.v7i2.316
Suryani, Surya, J., Nyanasuryanadi, P., & Utomo, B. (2024). Komunikasi Interpersonal Buddha dan Implementasi dalam Pelayanan Kepada Umat. Dharmasmrti: Jurnal Ilmu Agama dan Kebudayaan, 24(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.32795/ds.v24i1.5930
Vu, M. C., & Gill, R. (2023). Are Leaders Responsible for Meaningful Work? Perspectives from Buddhist-Enacted Leaders and Buddhist Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 187(2), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05293-w
Yati, I., & Suherman. (2024). Etika Buddhisme dalam Kajian Filsafat: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidisciplinary, 2(1), 360–370. https://doi.org/10.57235/jerumi.v2i1.1959
Yip, J., & Fisher, C. M. (2022). Listening in Organizations: A Synthesis and Future Agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0367
Younas, A., Wang, D., Javed, B., & Ul Haque, A. (2023). Inclusive Leadership and Voice Behavior: The Role of Psychological Empowerment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 163(2), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2022.2026283
Zou, W.-Q., & Chen, S.-C. (2022). Under the Humble Mask: Investigating When and How Leader-Expressed Humility Leads to Employee Voice. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 950059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950059
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Situ Asih, Uryanto Uryanto, Girlnanda Yansi Talenta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
