Integration of Higher Education and National Innovation in Indonesia in a Mixed-Methods Perspective Related to the Roles, Obstacles, and Collaboration Strategies of Triple Helix

Authors

  • Amrini Shofiyani Universitas Negeri Malang; Indonesia
  • Ahmad Munjin Nasih Universitas KH. A. Wahab Hasbullah Jombang; Indonesia
  • Muhammad Yasin Fatchul Barry Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang; Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v8i2.8758

Keywords:

Higher Education, Innovation System, Triple Helix, Absorptive Capacity, Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to examine the configuration and dynamics of triple helix relations (academics, industry, government) in Indonesia, evaluate the institutional capabilities of universities in transforming research outputs into innovations with socio-economic value, and formulate a policy framework conducive to productive collaboration and innovation downstreaming. This study employed a mixed-methods approach with a sequential explanatory design. The target population consisted of three actor groups: academics from accredited public and private universities, industry practitioners from priority sectors, and government officials from relevant ministries/agencies. Quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire survey of 450 respondents consisting of academics, industry practitioners, and government officials selected using a purposive stratified sampling technique. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and policy document analysis. Quantitative data analysis used descriptive and inferential statistics (Structural Equation Modeling/multiple regression), while qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The results showed that triple helix collaboration in Indonesia remains sporadic (72%) and is dominated by technical consulting (45%) and internships (40%), while joint research only reaches 18%. The institutional capacity of universities is still weak, with only 35% having a professionally managed Science and Technology Park and 73% acknowledging that Technology Transfer Office staff play more of an administrative than a strategic role. The matching fund program is known to 82% of academics, but the proposal success rate is only 22% due to administrative complexity and overlapping regulations between ministries. The integration of higher education into the national innovation system requires simultaneous interventions at three levels: strengthening institutional capacity at the micro level, establishing collaboration platforms with clear governance at the meso level, and harmonizing policies and regulations at the macro level. Future research is recommended to use longitudinal approaches and social network analysis to map the evolution of innovation networks more comprehensively.

References

Adi, C., Nugroho, J., Waskito, W., K., & Ramadhan, R. A. (2025). Mapping Indonesia's Relation to BRICS ( Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa): Two-Level Game Theory Approach. 5(2).

Akbar, A., & Zahfa, F. (2025). Validitas and Reliabilitas Validity and Reliability. Jiic: Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2(5), 8781–8787. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jiic

Arviansyah, A., Kusumastuti, R. D., Nurmala, N., & Wibowo, S. S. (2021). Data on Knowledge Management and Natural Disaster Preparedness: A Field Survey in East Lombok, Indonesia. Data in Brief, 36, 107156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107156

Arviansyah, M. R. (2020). Faktor untuk Meningkatkan Inovasi di Negara Berkembang – Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis. Business Innovation and Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(3), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.35899/biej.v2i3.132

Block, T., Prové, C., Dehaene, M., Abeele, P. Vanden, & Beeckmans, L. (2025). Understanding Urban Sustainability from Mode 2 Science and Transdisciplinary Education: How Master Thesis Ateliers of The Ghent Stadsacademie Tackle Wicked Issues. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(9), 20539–20564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02657-0

Ćudić, B., Alešnik, P., & Hazemali, D. (2022). Factors Impacting University–Industry Collaboration in European Countries. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00226-3

Dadan Kurniawan, M. A. R. (2026). Dapodik: Revolusi Integrasi Data Pendidikan Nasional. Afdan Rojabi, Publisher.

de Paula, D., Jühling, D., & Uebernickel, F. (2025). Designing Digital Health Innovation for Stigma-Affected Health Conditions: A Systems-Based View to Managing Chronic Pelvic Pain. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 0(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2485494

Dewanti, I. S. (2022). Kemampuan Absorptif Sebagai Variabel Mediasi pada Pengaruh Orientasi Kewirausahaan Terhadap Keunggulan Kompetitif. Paradigma: Jurnal Masalah Sosial, Politik, dan Kebijakan, 26(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.31315/paradigma.v26i1.6610

Edquist, C. (2010). Systems of Innovation Perspectives and Challenges. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 2(3).

Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation Ecosystems: A Conceptual Review and A New Definition. Technovation, 90–91(May 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098

Hartanto, S. (2026). Peran Inovasi Telekomunikasi Digital Mempercepat Transformasi dan Daya Saing Ekonomi Global Indonesia. 3(2), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.35316/jummy.v3i2.8360

Ilham Salim Siregar, Muhammad Haekal Matondang, N. dan S. (2024). Analisis Dinamika Perdagangan Global: Peran Inovasi dan Kualitas dalam Keberhasilan Ekspor-Impor. Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 9(204), 54–62.

Irawan, D. E., Purnomo, A., Sutiksno, D. U., Abraham, J., Alamsyah, A., Saputra, D. H., Javandira, T., & Rosyidah, E. (2018). Kajian Pendidikan Tinggi IDRI untuk DPR RI dan Ristek Dikti 2018 (Issue March 2021). ITB Press.

Kholifah. (2026). Model Pendidikan Global dan Implikasi terhadap Inovasi Pembelajaran di Indonesia. Qolamuna: Keislaman, Pendidikan, Literasi, dan Humaniora, 2(2), 235–244.

Kurniawan, A. (2025). Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi : Bagaimanakah Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi? 16(2).

Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Triple Helix: An Evolutionary Model of Innovations. Research Policy, 29(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00063-3

Marlia, M., Hadisiwi, P., & Priyatna, C. C. (2025). Inovasi Strategis dalam Tata Kelola Informasi Publik di PTN: Analisis Implementasi PPID Universitas Padjadjaran. Jane: Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 17(1), 249–256.

Nisa, L. S. (2022). Pelaksanaan Sistem Inovasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan, 17(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.47441/jkp.v17i1.274

Pandey, N., de Coninck, H., & Sagar, A. D. (2022). Beyond Technology Transfer: Innovation Cooperation to Advance Sustainable Development in Developing Countries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 11(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.422

Reiwanto, M. B. A. (2024). Pengarusutamaan Pancasila dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional berbasis Riset dan Inovasi. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 4(1), 1–10.

Salajegheh, M., Sandars, J., Mirzazadeh, A., & Gandomkar, R. (2024). Understanding The Capacity Development of Faculty Development Programs: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05715-5

Yennita. (2022). Kebijakan Pembangunan Pertanian Berbasis Inovasi Teknologi Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Produksi Komoditas Pertanian Strategis dan Pendapatan Petani Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian Agribisnis, 137–143. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/7377

Zakaria, & R. Okta Kurniawan. (2025). Strategi Pembelajaran pada Diklat Analis Pertahanan Negara dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Integrasi Nasional. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Pertahanan, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.63210/jp3.v2i1.129

Zhou, H. E. C. (2018). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Routledge.

Published

2026-05-10