Evaluation of the Aswaja Annahdliyah Curriculum in Early Childhood Education of NU Muslimat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v8i1.8868Keywords:
Aswaja Annahdliyah, CIPP, Curriculum Evaluation, Early Childhood Education, Education Policy, Muslimat NU PAUDAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Aswaja Annahdliyah curriculum in Early Childhood Education (PAUD) institutions under Muslimat NU in Jakarta, as part of efforts to improve educational policy. The research adopts a qualitative approach with a program evaluation design based on the CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, Product). Data were collected through observations, in-depth interviews, and document studies involving two principals of “A” accredited Muslimat NU PAUD institutions. Data analysis was conducted thematically using Atlas.ti software and validated through triangulation of techniques and sources. The findings indicate that the Aswaja Annahdliyah curriculum is in accordance with the fundamental needs of early childhood and community expectations, supported by a strong legal foundation and Islamic values. The curriculum makes a significant contribution to strengthening children’s character and religiosity. However, several weaknesses were identified, including limited innovation in learning, minimal technology integration, insufficient professional development for teachers, and suboptimal school-parent collaboration. In addition, the evaluation instruments for learning outcomes need to be strengthened to support more responsive program decision-making. This study recommends the development of a more adaptive curriculum, enhancement of teacher capacity through continuous training, and strengthening of cross-sector partnerships. The implications of this research are expected to serve as a reference for developing a more holistic and sustainable Islamic values-based PAUD curriculum policy.
References
Al-shanawani, H. M. (2019). Evaluation of Self-Learning Curriculum for Kindergarten Using Stufflebeam’s CIPP Model. SAGE Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822380
Aneza, I., Inayah, A. N., Nursifah, F., Nursaripah, S., & Adi, B. (2023). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Berbasis Model CIPP di PAUD Kober Nurul Anwar. Jurnal Ilmiah Cahaya PAUD, 5(2), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.33387/cahayapd.v5i2
Anindita, D. D., Hidayat, D., & Musa, S. (2023). Penerapan Evaluasi Model CIPP pada Program Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini di PAUD Al-Fattah Jakarta. Jurnal Eksistensi Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, 8(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.30870/e-plus.v8i1
Antariksa, W. F., Fattah, A., & Utami, M. A. P. (2022). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pesantren Mahasiswa Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). Evaluasi: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 75–86.
Anwar, S. (2020). Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Berbasis Karakter. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Aslan, M., & Uygun, N. (2019). Evaluation of Preschool Curriculum by Stufflebeam’s CIPP Evaluation Model. Education and Science, 44(200), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.7717
Aziz, S., & Mahmood, M. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189–206. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1180614.pdf
Bahadir, F., & Tuncer, M. (2020). Determining the Standards of Teaching and Learning Process as a Component of Curriculum. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(3), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.248.3
Berk, L. E. (2018). Development Through the Lifespan (7th ed.). Pearson.
Britto, P. R., Lye, S. J., Proulx, K., Yousafzai, A. K., Matthews, S. G., Vaivada, T., Perez-Escamilla, R., Rao, N., Ip, P., Fernald, L. C. H., MacMillan, H., & Hanson, M. (2017). Nurturing care: Promoting early childhood development. The Lancet, 389(10064), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31390-3
Darling-Hammond, L., Burns, D., Campbell, C., Goodwin, A. L., Hammerness, K., Low, E. L., McIntyre, A., Sato, M., & Zeichner, K. (2020). Empowered Educators: How High-Performing Systems Shape Teaching Quality Around the World. Jossey-Bass.
Elyana, L. (2021). New Paradigm Curriculum of Early Childhood Education. Journal of Curriculum Indonesia, 4(2), 81–86. http://hipkinjateng.org/jurnal/index.php/jci/article/view/48
Halimah, S., Yusuf, A., & Safiudin, K. (2024). Pesantren Education Management: The Transformation of Religious Learning Culture in the Age of Disruption. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(3), 648–666.
Hasibuan, A. T., Simangunsong, N., Rahmawati, E., & Rahmaini, R. (2020). Humanization of Education in the Challenges and Opportunities of the Disruption Era at Nahdlatul Ulama Elementary School. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 7(2), 264. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v7i2.6832
Heckman, J. J. (2011). The Economics of Inequality: The Value of Early Childhood Education. American Educator, 35(1), 31–47.
Hidayat, R. (2019). Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini. Kencana.
Istratati, Yaswinda, & Movitasari, M. A. (2022). Implementasi Model CIPP dalam Pelaksanaan PAUD Holistik Integratif. JIP: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 2(8), 2333–2342. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v2i8.1114
Kurniawati, E. W. (2020). Evaluasi Program pendidikan Perspektif Model CIPP (context, input, process, product). Ghaitsa: Islamic Education Journal, 1(1), 19–25.
Lewis, R. E., & Heckman, R. J. (2006). Talent Management: A Critical Review. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 139–154.
Morrison, G. S. (2015). Early Childhood Education Today (13th ed.). Pearson Education.
Mulyasa, E. (2018). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum (2013). PAUD. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Netriwinda, Yaswinda, & Movitaria, M. A. (2022). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan PAUD Holistik Integratif dengan Model CIPP. JIP: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 2(8), 2343–2352. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v2i8.1115
OECD. (2019). Providing Quality Early Childhood Education and Care: Results from the Starting Strong Survey 2018. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/301005d1-en
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues (7th ed.). Pearson.
Pugach, M. C., Blanton, L. P., Mickelson, A. M., & Boveda, M. (2019). Curriculum Theory: The Missing Perspective in Teacher Education for Inclusion. Teacher Education and Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419883665
Radja, P. L., Saefatu, I. D., Lopo, R. J. K., & Tse, E. (2024). Evaluasi Program PAUD Holistik Integratif dengan Model CIPP. Jurnal Pelita PAUD, 8(2), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.33222/pelitapaud.v8i2.3766
Rejina, K. C., & Baral, P. (2023). Applying the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) Model for Course Evaluation. KMC Journal, 5(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.3126/kmcj.v5i1.52460
Sapri, Zaini Dahlan, Ahmad Tarmizi Hasibuan, & Rahmawati, E. (2022). The Naquib al-Attas Educational Thought In Contemporary Islamic Education. Tadris: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 17(2), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.19105/tjpi.v17i2.4978
Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sylva, K., Muttock, S., Gilden, R., & Bell, D. (2016). Researching Effective Pedagogy in the Early Years. Department for Education.
Skene, K., Farrelly, C. M. O., Byrne, E. M., Kirby, N., Stevens, E. C., & Ramchandani, P. G. (2022). Can Guidance During Play Enhance Children’s Learning and Development? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Development, 1162–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13730
Stake, R. (1967). The Countenance of Educational Evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146816706800707
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. Springer.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. (2014). Evaluation, Theory, Models, and Applications. John Wiley & Sons.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to Evaluate for Improvement and Accountability. Guilford Press.
Suyadi, & Ulfah, M. (2015). Konsep Dasar PAUD. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Thohir, M., Setiawan, D., Zaini, M., & Dea, L. F. (2021). Implementasi pendidikan karakter Islam Aswaja pada mahasiswa PIAUD. Seling, 7(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.29062/seling.v7i1.735
Umam, N., Islamy, A. N., & Bariroh. (2023). Internalisasi Nilai Karakter Berbasis Ideologi Keagamaan di Lembaga PAUD berafiliasi dengan NU. Fondatia, 7(2), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v7i2.3390
UNESCO. (2020). Early Childhood Care and Education: Building the Foundation for Lifelong Learning. UNESCO Publishing.
Woodward, M. (2010). Java, Indonesia, and Islam (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (2019). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (4th ed.). Pearson.
Wu, X., Sahoo, D., & Hoi, S. C. H. (2022). Recent Advances in Deep Learning for Object Detection. Neurocomputing, 396, 39–64.
Yasar, G. C., & Aslan, B. (2021). Curriculum Theory: A Review Study. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 11(2), 237–260. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1329243.pdf
Yoshikawa, H., Weiland, C., Brooks-Gunn, J., Burchinal, M., Espinosa, L., Gormley, W., Ludwig, J., Magnuson, K., Phillips, D., & Zaslow, M. (2018). Investing in Early Childhood Development and Its Potential to Reduce Inequality. The Lancet, 389(10064), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31389-7
Yusra, N. (2018). Muhammadiyah: Gerakan Pembaharuan Pendidikan Islam. Potensia: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 4(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.24014/potensia.v4i1.5269
Zhang, W., Guan, Y., & Hu, Z. (2024). The Efficacy of Project-Based Learning in Enhancing Computational Thinking Among Students: A Meta-Analysis of 31 Experiments and Quasi-Experiments. In Education and Information Technologies (Issue 0123456789). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12392-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yuliwati Yuliwati, Lutfi Hardiyanto, Romdanih Romdanih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
