The Role of Metta and Karuna Values in Buddhist Leadership on Prosocial Work Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v8i1.8960Keywords:
Metta Leadership, Karuna Leadership, Value Congruence, Prosocial Work Behavior, Religious OrganizationsAbstract
his study examines the effects of Metta and Karuna values in Buddhist leadership on Prosocial Work Behavior, with Value Congruence as a mediating variable, within the Indonesian Buddhist Representative Organization (WALUBI). A quantitative survey approach was employed. The research population comprised leaders and active members of WALUBI, from which 150 respondents were selected using a purposive sampling technique based on organizational involvement criteria. The study utilized primary data collected through a structured questionnaire distributed both directly and online. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with the assistance of SmartPLS software. The findings reveal that Metta Leadership positively influences Value Congruence but does not directly affect Prosocial Work Behavior. In contrast, Karuna Leadership has a positive and significant effect on both Value Congruence and Prosocial Work Behavior. Furthermore, Value Congruence significantly affects Prosocial Work Behavior, acting as a full mediator in the relationship between Metta Leadership and Prosocial Work Behavior, and as a partial mediator in the relationship between Karuna Leadership and Prosocial Work Behavior. These results indicate that Buddhist leadership values require processes of internalization and value alignment to be effectively translated into prosocial work behavior. The study contributes theoretically to the literature on spiritual and Buddhist leadership by highlighting the strategic role of Value Congruence as a key mechanism linking leadership values and prosocial behavior. Practically, the findings provide insights for non-profit religious organizations to strengthen the integration of leadership values into organizational practices in order to foster sustainable prosocial work behavior.
References
Ariyanto, A., Fuad, N., & Muhab, S. (2023). The Influence of Transformational Leadership and Adversity Quotient on Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Multikulturalisme, 5(1), 142–161. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v4i3.2339
Bailey, N. W., Comte, W., Chambers, R., Bartlett, L., Connaughton, S., & Hassed, C. (2023). Participation in Online Mindfulness was Associated with Improved Self-Compassion and Prosocial Attitudes. Mindfulness, 14(7), 1735–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02168-7
Bao, Y., & Li, C. (2019). From moral leadership to positive work behaviors: the mediating roles of value congruence and leader-member exchange. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 13(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-019-0052-3
Bhangaokar, R. (2024). Compassion, Kindness, and Moral Well-being: Indian Perspectives (pp. 287–299). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46349-5_16
Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016). The Bright Side of Being Prosocial at Work, and the Dark Side, Too: A Review and Agenda for Research on Other-Oriented Motives, Behavior, and Impact in Organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599–670. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260
Cai, H., Zhu, L., & Jin, X. (2024). Construed Organizational Ethical Climate and Whistleblowing Behavior: The Moderated Mediation Effect of Person–Organization Value Congruence and Ethical Leader Behavior. Behavioral Sciences, 14(4), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040293
Chen, H., Liu, C., Cao, X., Hong, B., Huang, D. H., Liu, C. Y., & Chiou, W. K. (2021). Effects of loving-kindness meditation on doctors’ mindfulness, empathy, and communication skills. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084033
Dong, E., Kim, Y., & Miller, K. E. (2025). How Does a CEO Motivate Employee Prosocial Behaviors at Work? Exploring the Impacts of CEO Leadership on Employee Prosocial Motivation and Prosocial Behaviors. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2025.2579545
Estrada, M., & Hosoda, K. (2024). Leading with Heroic Kindness. In Encyclopedia of Heroism Studies (pp. 1240–1245). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48129-1_311
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant Leadership: A systematic Review and Call For Future Research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
Faheem, M. A., Ahmad, S., & Tayyab, H. (2024). Prosocial Behavior and Work Reattachment in Healthcare: The Mediating and Moderating Influence of Mindfulness And Awe. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 12(4), 908–927. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-10-2023-0288
Feather, J., McGillis Hall, L., Trbovich, P., & Baker, G. R. (2018). An Integrative Review of Nurses’ Prosocial Behaviours Contributing to Work Environment Optimization, Organizational Performance, and Quality of Care. Journal of Nursing Management, 26(7), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12600
Fernández-Muiños, M. (2026). Spirituality and Entrepreneurship. In Encyclopedia of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Spirituality (pp. 1302–1313). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76750-0_187
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Han, H., Ariza-Montes, A., Tirado-Valencia, P., & Lee, S. (2020). Volunteering Attitude, Mental Well-Being, and Loyalty to the Non-Profit Religious Organization of Volunteer Tourism. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114618
Hart, R. (2024). Prosocial Behaviors at Work: Key Concepts, Measures, Interventions, Antecedents, and Outcomes. Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14010078
Harvey, P. (2013). An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.nkpbuddhism.com/history6.pdf
Hou, B., Li, X., & Yuan, Y. (2023). Compassionate Leadership and Prosocial Behavior: The Mediating Role of Moral Identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(2), 389–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05186-0
Hougaard, R., Carter, J., & Afton, R. (2020). Compassionate Leadership: How To Create And Maintain Engaged, Committed, and High-Performing Teams. Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business Review.
Jeong, J.-G., Choi, S. B., & Kang, S.-W. (2022). Leader’s Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility and Team Members’ Psychological Well-Being: Mediating Effects of Value Congruence, Climate, and Pro-Social Behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063607
Kanov, J. M., Maitlis, S., Worline, M. C., Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. M. (2004). Compassion in Organizational Life. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 808–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260211
Khan, N. U., Zada, M., & Estay, C. (2023). Servant Leadership and Employee Prosocial Rule-Breaking: The Underlying Effects of Psychological Safety and Compassion at Work. Plos One, 18(4), e0282832. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282832
Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of Individuals’ Fit At Work: A Meta‐Analysis of Person–Job, Person–Organization, Person–Group, and Person–Supervisor Fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
Kunze, F., & Toader, A. F. (2019). Lifespan Perspectives on Organizational Climate. In Work Across the Lifespan (pp. 561–580). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812756-8.00024-4
Lilius, J. M., Kanov, J., Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., & Maitlis, S. (2011). Compassion Revealed. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0021
Mo, S., Lupoli, M. J., Newman, A., & Umphress, E. E. (2023). Good Intentions, Bad Behavior: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature on Unethical Prosocial Behavior (UPB) at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(2), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2617
Molina, A. D. (2022). Value Congruence. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 13207–13213). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_2339
O’Keefe, D. F., Messervey, D., & Squires, E. C. (2018). Promoting Ethical and Prosocial Behavior: The Combined Effect of Ethical Leadership and Coworker Ethicality. Ethics & Behavior, 28(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1365607
Ogied Muhammad Hanif, & Syahrizal Syahrizal. (2025). The Influence of Mindfulness at Work on Prosocial Behavior in Independent Workers in Bukittinggi City with Empathy as A Mediation Variable. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 4(2), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.55606/ijemr.v4i2.470
Pansini, M., Buonomo, I., & Benevene, P. (2024). Fostering Sustainable Workplace Through Leaders’ Compassionate Behaviors: Understanding the Role of Employee Well-Being and Work Engagement. Sustainability, 16(23), 10697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310697
Qu, Y. E., Dasborough, M. T., Zhou, M., & Todorova, G. (2019). Should Authentic Leaders Value Power? A Study of Leaders’ Values and Perceived Value Congruence. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 1027–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3617-0
Roh, T., Kim, M.-J., & Hong, Y. (2023). Does Servant Leadership Decrease Bad Behaviors? The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety and the Moderating Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability, 15(22), 15901. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215901
Salim, A., & Rajput, N. A. R. (2021). The Relationship Between Transformational Leadership, Prosocial Behavioral Intentions, and Organizational Performance. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 487–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.487
Schlyakhto, E., Ilin, I., Devezas, T., Correia Leitão, J. C., & Cubico, S. (Eds.). (2024). Innovations for Healthcare and Wellbeing. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53614-4
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. john wiley & sons.
Sonnentag, S., & Starzyk, A. (2015). Perceived Prosocial Impact, Perceived Situational Constraints, and Proactive Work Behavior: Looking at two Distinct Affective Pathways. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(6), 806–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2005
Suifan, T. S., Diab, H., Alhyari, S., & Sweis, R. J. (2020). Does Ethical Leadership Reduce Turnover Intention? The Mediating Effects of Psychological Empowerment and Organizational Identification. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(4), 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1690611
Theissen, M. H., Theissen, H. H., & Gümüsay, A. A. (2024). Self‐transcendent leadership: A meta‐perspective. European Management Review, 21(4), 854–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12640
Wang, C. (2025). Beyond Mindfulness: How Buddhist Meditation Transforms Consciousness Through Distinct Psychological Pathways. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1649564
Zhang, S. (2020). Workplace Spirituality and Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(3), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3966-3
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Meriyawaty Amelia Prasetio, Situ Asih, Albert Albert
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
