Integrating the CER Framework in Argumentative Writing to Foster Logical Thinking and Evidence-Based Reasoning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v7i1.9263Keywords:
CER framework, argumentative writing, logical thinking, evidence-based reasoning, pedagogical effectivenessAbstract
This study investigates integrating the Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning (CER) framework to enhance students' argumentative writing skills, a critical competency in 21st-century literacy, and employing a mixed-method approach that combines a qualitative descriptive analysis with a pre-experimental design. Data were rigorously collected through semi-structured interviews, direct field observations, and comprehensive writing assessments, including pretest and posttest evaluations. This study employed a mixed-methods approach with a pre-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design involving 30 eleventh-grade students at MAS Al Khairiyah in Jambi, for a total of 412 students, selected through purposive sampling. Quantitative data from performance tests and qualitative data from observations and interviews were analyzed simultaneously using the N-Gain test and an interactive analysis model to describe students' cognitive transformation in argumentative writing. The findings reveal a significant improvement in all argumentative components, with a "highly effective" N-Gain score of 0.86. Students demonstrated a qualitative transition from subjective opinions to structured discourse by mastering clear claims, integrating factual evidence, and engaging in coherent, logical reasoning. This study confirms that the CER framework serves as a robust cognitive scaffold, making it a recommended instructional strategy for developing intellectual rigor and persuasive communication skills.
References
Allen, J., & Rogers, M. P. (2015). Putting Ideas on Paper: Formulating Scientific Explanations Using The Claim, Evidence, And Reasoning (CER) Framework. Science and Children, 53(3), 32–37.
Ariely, M., Nazaretsky, T., & Alexandron, G. (2024). Causal‐Mechanical Explanations In Biology: Applying Automated Assessment For Personalized Learning in The Science Classroom. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 61(8), 1858–1889.
Buntha, A., Yasri, P., & Duangpummet, P. (2024). Enhancing Science Education in Thailand: Implementing the CER Framework To Improve PISA Performance and Student Argumentation. 2024 9th International STEM Education Conference (ISTEM-Ed), 1–6.
Castro, A. L. (2024). Building Capacity For Implementing The CASEL, SEL Framework in Grades 4 & 5 of A Title I District Using: An Action Research Study. Proquest LLC.
Chen, Y.-C. (2020). Dialogic Pathways To Manage Uncertainty For Productive Engagement In Scientific Argumentation. Science & Education, 29(2), 331–375. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11191-020-00111-Z
Eswaran, U. (2024). Project-Based Learning: Fostering Collaboration, Creativity, and Critical Thinking. In Enhancing Education With Intelligent Systems and Data-Driven Instruction (Pp. 23–43). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Febriyanti, E. R., & Rizki, M. (2021). Argumentation Skills: An Analysis Of EFL Students’ Essays Based on Toulmin’s Model of Argument. 2nd International Conference on Education, Language, Literature, And Arts (ICELLA 2021), 86–95.
Gu, X., & Xu, Z. (2021). Sustainable Development of EFL Learners’ Research Writing Competence and Their Identity Construction: Chinese Novice Writer-Researchers’ Metadiscourse Use In English Research Articles: Sustainability, 13(17), 9523.
Handoyo, B., Purwanto, P., Ridha, S., & Tan, G. I. (2024). Effect Of The Spatial Based Learning Using Quantum Geographic Information System on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Journal Of Social Studies Education Research, 15(5), 328–379.
Hoffman, K., Williams, T. H., & Kephart, K. (2024). The Use of Guided Reflections in Learning Proof Writing in Education Sciences (Vol. 14, Issue 10, P. 1084). Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Educsci14101084
Hutahaean, B., Katolik, U., Thomas, S., Telaumbanua, S., Indonesia, U. P., Tamba, L., Katolik, U., Thomas, S., Gema, R., Hutabarat, N., & Quality, U. (2024). Analysis of Innovative and Adaptive Higher Education Curriculum Development to Education 5 . 0 Based Challenges in Indonesia. 23(4), 76–98.
Hyland, K. (2016). Writing With Attitude: Conveying A Stance in Academic Texts in Teaching English Grammar To Speakers Of Other Languages (Pp 246–265). Routledge.
Irshad, S., Maan, M. F., Batool, H., & Hanif, A. (2021). Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development ( ZPD): An Evaluative Tool for Language Learning and Social Development in Early Childhood Education. Multicultural Education, 7(6), 234–242. Https://Doi.Org/10.5281/Zenodo.4940172
Kalvapalle, S. G., Phillips, N., & Cornelissen, J. (2024). Entrepreneurial Pitching: A Critical Review and Integrative Framework. Academy of Management Annals, 18(2), 550–599.
Kantar, L. D., Ezzeddine, S., & Rizk, U. (2020). Rethinking Clinical Instruction Through The Zone of Proximal Development. Nurse Education Today, 95, 104595. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Nedt.2020.104595
Kartika, H., Warmi, A., Urayama, D., & Suprihatiningsih, S. (2024). Mathematical Argumentation in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(7), 196–219.
Kranich, N. (2024). Civic Literacy: Reimagining A Role For Libraries. The Library Quarterly, 94(1), 4–34.
Lambright, K. (2024). The Effect Of A Teacher’s Mindset on The Cascading Zones of Proximal Development: A Systematic Review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(3), 1313–1329. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10758-023-09696-0
Licona, P. R., & Kelly, G. J. (2020). Translanguaging in A Middle School Science Classroom: Constructing Scientific Arguments in English and Spanish. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 485–510.
Magalhães, A. L. (2020). Teaching How to Develop an Argument Using the Toulmin Model. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Educational Research (IJMCER), 2(3), 1–7.
Mcneil, L. A. (2021). Using Claim-Evidence-Reasoning (CER) In An Undergraduate Chemistry Class: An Exploration Of CER Construction and Race, Gender, and Status. University of Georgia.
Mirra, N., & Garcia, A. (2021). In Search of The Meaning and Purpose Of 21st‐Century Literacy Learning: A Critical Review of Research and Practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(3), 463–496.
Molerov, D., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Nagel, M.-T., Brückner, S., Schmidt, S., & Shavelson, R. J. (2020). Assessing University Students’ Critical Online Reasoning Ability: A Conceptual and Assessment Framework With Preliminary Evidence. Frontiers In Education, Volume 5-2020. Https://Www.Frontiersin.Org/Journals/Education/Articles/10.3389/Feduc.2020.577843
Mughrabi, N. (2021). Exploring Project-Based Learning Practices To Foster Students’ Motivation: Practices from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom).
Mutambiranwa, O. H. (2024). Teachers’ Perceptions of The Impact of STEM Project-Based Learning on Critical Thinking Skills Of Intermediate Phase Learners. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
Nokes, J. D., & De La Paz, S. (2023). Historical Argumentation: Watching Historians and Teaching Youth. Written Communication, 40(2), 333–372.
Nussbaum, E. M. (2021). Critical Integrative Argumentation: Toward Complexity in Students’ Thinking. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 1–17.
Nussbaum, E. M., Van Winkle, M. S., Tian, L., Putney, L. G., Huerta, M., Perera, H. N., Dove, I. J., Herrera, A. N., & Carroll, K. R. (2024). Extending Science Instruction Beyond The CER: Use of Critical Questions in The Argumentation of Middle School Science Students. Science Education, 108(5), 1420–1447.
Nussbaum, M. (2023). Bridging Dialogic Pedagogy and Argumentation Theory Through Critical Questions. Dialogic Pedagogy.
Osman, W. H., & Januin, J. (2021). Analysing ESL Persuasive Essay Writing Using Toulmin’s Model Of Argument. Psychology And Education, 58(1), 1810–1821.
Pelenkahu, N., Ali, M. I., Tatipang, D. P., Wuntu, C. N., & Rorintulus, O. A. (2024). Metacognitive Strategies And Critical Thinking In Elevating EFL Argumentative Writing Proficiency: Practical Insights. Studies In English Language And Education, 11(2), 873–892.
Phillips Galloway, E., Qin, W., Uccelli, P., & Barr, C. D. (2020). The Role of Cross-Disciplinary Academic Language Skills in Disciplinary, Source-Based Writing: Investigating The Role of Core Academic Language Skills In Science Summarization For Middle-Grade Writers. Reading And Writing, 33(1), 13–44.
Puttick, S., & Wynn, J. (2021). Constructing ‘Good Teaching’through Written Lesson Observation Feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 47(2), 152–169.
Sidik, E. J. (2022). The Integration of Multimodality in English Teaching in Indonesian Junior High Schools. By A Thesis Submitted as Part of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctorate in Education ( TESOL ) In The School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's.
Song, Y., Van Rijn, P., Deane, P., & Chao, S.-F. (2024). Assessing Argumentation Skills of Middle School Students: A Learning Progression Approach. Reading and Writing, 37(1), 103–127.
Suyadi, N., Z., Sutrisno, & Baidi. (2022). Academic Reform and Sustainability of Islamic Higher Education in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 89, 102534. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Ijedudev.2021.102534
Takona, J. P. (2024). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 1011–1013.
Taye, T., & Mengesha, M. (2024). Identifying And Analyzing Common English Writing Challenges Among Regular Undergraduate Students. Heliyon, 10(17).
Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific Literacy And Social Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Science Participation and Emancipation. Science & Education, 30(3), 557–587.
Weiss, K. A., McDermott, M. A., & Hand, B. (2022). Characterising Immersive Argument-Based Inquiry Learning Environments In School-Based Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Studies In Science Education, 58(1), 15–47.
Xie, C., Li, C., Sung, S., & Jiang, R. (2022). Engaging Students in Distance Learning of Science With Remote Labs 2.0. IEEE Transactions On Learning Technologies, 15(1), 15–31. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3153005
Zhou, D. (2024). “Learn To Argue” And “Argue To Learn”: Meta-Analysis of Effective Instructional Design for Online Scientific Argumentation Activities. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 4857–4880.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Intan Kholida Dj.S, Irma Suryani, Mukhlash Abrar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
