Hybrid Governance of Religious-Based Higher Education with Limited Autonomy and Dual Meritocracy of the University of Muhammadiyah in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v8i2.9429Keywords:
Higher Education Governance, Faith-Based Institutions, Muhammadiyah, Institutional Autonomy, Quality AssuranceAbstract
This study examines how faith-based higher education institutions navigate the tension between academic autonomy and centralized ideological control within the Muhammadiyah higher education network. It employs a qualitative approach with a comparative case study design. Data consist of university statutes from four Muhammadiyah universities: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya, and Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong, as well as the central Internal Quality Audit (AMI) rubric. Data were collected through documentation, supported by interviews with university leaders and quality assurance units, as well as limited observations of governance practices. Data sources include both primary and secondary materials. Analysis was conducted using qualitative procedures involving data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal a hybrid governance configuration in which academic functions are decentralized to support flexibility, while strategic decision-making and resource control remain centrally coordinated. Three key dimensions emerge: constrained autonomy, dual meritocracy, and the bureaucratization of ideological values within quality assurance systems. These results indicate that institutional autonomy is structurally bounded by formalized ideological commitments. The study proposes a multi-polar governance model that integrates academic excellence with organizational identity, enabling coherence across a large and geographically dispersed higher education network.
References
Altbach, P. G. (2016). Global Perspectives on Higher Education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (Eds.). (2011). The Road to Academic Excellence: The Making Of World-Class Research Universities. World Bank.
Amis, J., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Values and Organizational Change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38(4), 436–465.
Austin, I., & Jones, G. A. (2018). Emerging Trends in Higher Education Governance: Reflecting on Performance, Accountability, and Transparency. Research Handbook on Quality, Performance and Accountability in Higher Education, 536–547.
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.
Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and Human Resource Management (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Brewer, B., Leung, J. Y. H., & Scott, I. (2015). Value-based Integrity Management and Bureaucratic Organizations: Changing the Mix. International Public Management Journal, 18(3), 390–410.
Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012a). From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.684462
Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012b). From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530.
Carpenter, J. A., & others. (2016). Institutional Identity in Faith-Based Universities. Journal of Higher Education, 87(4), 521–545.
Carpenter, R. E., McWhorter, R., & Stone, K. (2023). Adopting Virtual Reality for Education: Exploring Teachers’ Perspectives on Readiness, Opportunities, and Challenges.
Christensen, S. M. (2015). Solidarity in Suffering and Glory: The Unifying Role of Psalm 34 in 1 Peter 3: 10-12. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 58(2), 335.
Christensen, T. (2011). University Governance Reforms: Potential Problems of More Autonomy? Higher Education, 62(4), 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9401-z
De Boer, H., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2007). On the Way Towards New Public Management? Governance of Higher Education in Europe. Higher Education, 53(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-5048-5
Demmke, C. (2024). The institutionalization of Integrity Policies and the Management of A Growing Ethics Bureaucracy. In Empowering Public Administrators (pp. 193–214). Routledge.
Enders, J., De Boer, H., & Weyer, E. (2013). Regulatory Autonomy and Performance: The reform of higher education revisited. Higher Education, 65(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9573-6
Estermann, T., & Nokkala, T. (2011). University Autonomy in Europe II.
Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The Steering of Higher Education Systems: A Public Management Perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.
Fitriana, F. (2019). Konsep Pendidikan Islam dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an Surah Luqman Ayat 12-19. Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Pendidikan Tadarus Tarbawy, 1(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.31000/jkip.v1i1.1497
Glanzer, P. L., & others. (2011). Faith-Based Higher Education: Characteristics and Challenges. Higher Education, 61(3), 253–269.
Hardjaloka, L. (2014). Studi Penerapan E-Government di Indonesia dan Negara Lainnya sebagai Solusi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Sektor Publik. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 3(3), 435. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i3.35
Irna Prayetno. (2025). Tantangan dan Solusi dalam Pembelajaran PAI di Era Digital. Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Sosial Keagamaan, 2(3), 616–622.
James, E. (2017). Religious Organizations and Governance Structures. Public Administration Review, 77(2), 189–199.
Johnson, U., Ntuli, L. F., & Ncwana, T. (2026). Examining Public Sector Professionalism in KwaZulu-Natal: The Role of Accountability and Ethical Leadership in Governance. African Journal of Public Administration and Environmental Studies (AJOPAES), 5(1), 349.
Jongbloed, B. (2015). Universities as Hybrid Organizations: Trends, Drivers, and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(9), 641–649.
King, R. P. (2007). Governance and Accountability in the higher Education Regulatory State. Higher Education, 53(4), 411–430.
Maassen, P., & Cloete, N. (2006). Global Reform Trends in Higher Education. In Transformation in Higher Education: Global Pressures and Local Realities (pp. 7–33). Springer.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Mok, K. H., & Jiang, J. (2017). Massification of Higher Education and Challenges in Asia. Higher Education Policy, 30(3), 315–332.
Mookherjee, D. (2006). Decentralization, Hierarchies, and Incentives: A Mechanism Design Perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(2), 367–390.
Nuryatno, M. (2019). Islamic Higher Education in Indonesia: Development and challenges. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 57(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2019.571.1-28
Osborne, S. P. (Ed.). (2010). The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory And Practice f Public Governance. Routledge.
Paauwe, J. (2009). HRM and Performance: Achievements and Challenges. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(2), 129–142.
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the Hybrid Organization. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001.
Parboteeah, K. P., & others. (2009). Religious Values and Organizational Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 589–599.
Pruvot, E. B., & Estermann, T. (2017). University Autonomy in Europe III.
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (4th ed.). Sage.
Tracey, P. (2012). Religion and Organization Theory. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 1–25.
Welch, A. (2012). The Limits of University Autonomy. Higher Education Quarterly, 66(3), 233–250.
Wilhoit, J. C., & Dettoni, J. M. (2017). Nurture That Is Christian: Developmental Perspectives on Christian Education. Baker Academic.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jaenudin Jaenudin, Irnie Victorynie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
