Public Space, Technology, and Humanity in Inclusion Education Policy Dynamics in Indonesia
Abstract
Discrimination in the education world is not only incidental under certain conditions. The injustice sometimes "deliberately" slips into policy products that are not accessible to all groups. Public space and humanity are important to formulating a humane and fair. Policy products that are ambiguous and insensitive to dynamic technological developments create uncertainty for policy executors in implementing policies in the field. This research dissects the products of inclusive education policies from time to time using the theory of power relations to find the dimensions of humanity, technology, and public space and capture the visible social impacts of the implementation of educational policies both in real space and virtual space. The findings of this research are: first, the existing policy products indirectly include elements of humanity in general, but on the other hand, they leave aside technological developments which are very dynamic. The two existing policy products do not provide input and evaluate the weaknesses and strengths of the implemented policies.
Downloads
References
Anderson, James E. 1994. Public Policy Making: An Introduction. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Budiarjo, Miriam. 2007. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Creswell, John W. 2010. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif Dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Diye, Thomas R. 1981. Understanding Public Policy. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Dun, William N. 2002. Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University.
Fattah, Nanang. 2013. Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Fikri, Abdullah. 2014. “Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat Difabel dalam Pembentukan Kebijakan Pendidikan Tinggi Inklusif.” INKLUSI 1(1):109–28. doi: 10.14421/ijds.010106.
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Trans A. Sheridan. Harmondsworth: Peregrine.
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings. 1972-1977. C Gordon (Ed). Brighton: Harvester.
Halik, Abd. 2017. “MENCARI FORMAT PENDIDIKAN ANAK YANG IDEAL (Kritik Terhadap Konsep Full-Day School).” TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 11(2):132–48. doi: 10.19105/tadris.v11i2.1164.
Hamdi, Muchlis. 2014. Kebijakan Publik, Proses Analisis, Dan Partisipasi. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Handayani, Suci. 2008. Pelibatan Masyarakat Marginal Dalam Perencanaan Dan Penganggaran Partisipatif (Sebuah Pengalaman Di Solo). Surakarta: KOMPIP.
Hanjarwati, Astri, and Siti Aminah. 2014. “Evaluasi Implementasi Kebijakan Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta Mengenai Pendidikan Inklusi.” INKLUSI Journal of Disability Studies 1(2):221–48. doi: 10.14421/ijds.010206.
Hardiman, F. Budi. 2007. Filsafat Modern. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Hogwood, B. W., and (L.A Gunn. 1984. Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huntington, Samuel, and Joan Nelson. 1994. Partisipasi Politik Di Negara Berkembang. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Laswell, Harold, and Abraham Kaplan. 1970. Power and Society. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
Madani, Muhlis. 2011. Dimensi Interaksi Aktor Dalam Proses Perumusan Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Masdin, Masdin. 2009. “KONSEP DASAR ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN TINGGI.” Shautut Tarbiyah 21(1):83–101.
Miles, Mateew B., A. M. Huberman, and Johnny Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods, Sourcebook, Third Edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication, inc.
Moko, Haryatmoko. 2003. Etika Politik Dan Kekuasaan. Jakarta: Kompas.
Muazza, Hardiyanto, and Muhammad Sofwan. 2018. “ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN INKLUSI: STUDI KASUS DI SEKOLAH DASAR JAMBI.” Jurna Kependidikan 2(1):1–12.
Munadi, Muhammad, and Barnawi. 2011. Kebijakan Publik Di Bidang Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Nazir, Mohammad. 1999. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Nugroho, Riant. 2009. Public Policy. Jakarta: Elex Media.
Nugroho, Riant. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kebijakan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Pomalingo, Samsi. 2014. “PERGURUAN TINGGI DAN TRANSFORMASI NILAI-NILAI ISLAM DALAM KONTEKS SOSIAL-BUDAYA MASYARAKAT INDONESIA.” Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 2(3):119–34.
Prijono, Onny S., and A.W.M. Pranarka. 1996. Pemberdayaan Konsep, Kebijakan, Dan Implementasi. Jakarta: CSIS.
Rakhmad. 2009. Teori Adsminitrasi Dan Manejemen Publk. Jakarta: Pustaka Arif.
Ritzer, George, and Douglas J. Goodman. 2010. Teori Sosisologi, Dari Sosiologi Klasik Sampai Perkembangan Mutakhir Teori Sosial Postmodern,. Yogyakarta: Keasi Wacana.
Ro’fah, Andayani, and Muhrisun Afandi. 2010. Inklusi Pada Pendidikan Tinggi: Best Practise Pembelajaran Dan Pelayanan Adaptif Bagi Mahasiswa Difabel Netra. Yogyakarta: PSLD UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
S, Nasution. 1998. Metode Peneltian Naturalistik. Bandung: Tarsito.
Suryadi, Aceh. 1994. Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan, Sebuah Pengantar. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Tanzeh, Ahmad. 2009. Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Teras.
Tilaar, H. A. R., and Riant Nugroho. 2012. Kebijakan Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
UNICEF. 2013. The State of the World’s Children 2013: Chi Ldren Wi Th Disabilities. New York: United Nations Children Fund.
Winarno, Budi. 2005. Teori Dan Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Medpres.
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Miftah, Abu Choir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit manuscript retain its copyright and grant publisher right of first publication licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to access (search, read, download, and cite), share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon any material) the work for any lawful purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Qalamuna: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama.
