Education Dynamics Amid Economic Crisis: Access, Quality, Prosperity Through Policy, Society
Keywords:
Education; economic crises; social factors; policy; access; quality; well-being.
Abstract
In this extensive study, we thoroughly analyzed educational dynamics within the context of an economic crisis, primarily focusing on the intricate interplay among social, economic, and policy factors. Our research aimed to understand how these factors intersected and collectively influenced educational access, quality, and well-being during economic turmoil. The research methodology encompassed a comprehensive review of existing literature, empirical data collection through surveys and interviews, and quantitative analysis of educational outcomes across diverse economic conditions. Policy interventions were pivotal in shaping education's response to the economic crisis. Targeted measures, such as increased funding for low-income schools and initiatives supporting educators, proved effective in mitigating the adverse effects of economic downturns on education. Qualitative data underscored the invaluable role of social capital and community resilience in supporting education during challenging times. Communities with active social networks and robust community organizations supported students and educators. Our findings unveiled a multifaceted landscape marked by both challenges and opportunities. Notably, the economic crisis disproportionately impacted marginalized populations, leading to widening disparities in educational outcomes. Access to educational resources was severely disrupted, particularly in disadvantaged regions, exacerbating pre-existing inequalities. Moreover, the psychological well-being of students and educators emerged as a crucial aspect of educational quality, with rising stress and anxiety influencing the learning environment.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social Capital and Community Resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299
Almustafa, H., Nguyen, Q. K., Liu, J., & Dang, V. C. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 on firm risk and performance in MENA countries: Does national governance quality matter? PLOS ONE, 18(2), e0281148. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281148
Alradhawi, M., Shubber, N., Sheppard, J., & Ali, Y. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental well-being amongst individuals in society- A letter to the editor on “The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus and COVID-19 pandemic: A review.” International Journal of Surgery (London, England), 78, 147–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.070
Baldissera, A. (2023). Sustainability reporting in banks: History of studies and a conceptual framework for thinking about the future by learning from the past. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2491
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022). Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carvajal, M., Nadeem, M., & Zaman, R. (2022). Biodiversity disclosure, sustainable development and environmental initiatives: Does board gender diversity matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 969–987. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2929
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dumenu, W. K., & Obeng, E. A. (2016). Climate change and rural communities in Ghana: Social vulnerability, impacts, adaptations and policy implications. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.010
Fang, E. F., Xie, C., Schenkel, J. A., Wu, C., Long, Q., Cui, H., Aman, Y., Frank, J., Liao, J., Zou, H., Wang, N. Y., Wu, J., Liu, X., Li, T., Fang, Y., Niu, Z., Yang, G., Hong, J., Wang, Q., … Woo, J. (2020). A research agenda for ageing in China in the 21st century (2nd edition): Focusing on basic and translational research, long-term care, policy and social networks. Ageing Research Reviews, 64, 101174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2020.101174
Fatemi, F., Ardalan, A., Aguirre, B., Mansouri, N., & Mohammadfam, I. (2017). Social vulnerability indicators in disasters: Findings from a systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.09.006
Gaynor, T. S., & Wilson, M. E. (2020a). Social Vulnerability and Equity: The Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19. Public Administration Review, 80(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13264
Gaynor, T. S., & Wilson, M. E. (2020b). Social Vulnerability and Equity: The Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 832–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13264
Giambartolomei, C., Vukcevic, D., Schadt, E. E., Franke, L., Hingorani, A. D., Wallace, C., & Plagnol, V. (2014). Bayesian Test for Colocalisation between Pairs of Genetic Association Studies Using Summary Statistics. PLOS Genetics, 10(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004383
Giunta, V., Bäckman, E., Salirwe, M. E., & Kalyonge, J. (2023). Risky Business: The Intersection of Sustainability and Credit Risk Assessment – a Strategic Perspective. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-25186
Góes, H. A. de A., Fatima, G., Santos Jhunior, R. de O., & Boaventura, J. M. G. (2023). Managing for stakeholders towards corporate environmental sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1561–1572. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2448
Greene, M. (2018). Socio-technical transitions and dynamics in everyday consumption practice. Global Environmental Change, 52, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.007
Haider, M., Shannon, R., Moschis, G. P., & Autio, E. (2023). How Has the COVID-19 Crisis Transformed Entrepreneurs into Sustainable Leaders? Sustainability, 15(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065358
Kim, D. D., & Neumann, P. J. (2020). Analyzing the Cost Effectiveness of Policy Responses for COVID-19: The Importance of Capturing Social Consequences. Medical Decision Making, 40(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20922987
Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder Engagement: Past, Present, and Future. Business & Society, 61(5), 1136–1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211066595
Madani, R. A. (2019). Analysis of Educational Quality, a Goal of Education for All Policy. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 100–109.
Maddaloni, F. D., & Sabini, L. (2022). Very important, yet very neglected: Where do local communities stand when examining social sustainability in major construction projects? International Journal of Project Management, 40(7), 778–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.08.007
Markkula, J. (2021). ‘We move the world’: The mobile labor of Filipino seafarers. Mobilities, 16(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1880129
Mei, C. (2020). Policy style, consistency and the effectiveness of the policy mix in China’s fight against COVID-19. Policy and Society, 39(3), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1787627
Mohamed, S., & Thomas, M. (2017). The mental health and psychological well-being of refugee children and young people: An exploration of risk, resilience and protective factors. Educational Psychology in Practice, 33(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2017.1300769
Moslehpour, M., Chau, K. Y., Tu, Y.-T., Nguyen, K.-L., Barry, M., & Reddy, K. D. (2022). Impact of corporate sustainable practices, government initiative, technology usage, and organizational culture on automobile industry sustainable performance. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(55), 83907–83920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21591-2
Nyqvist, F., Forsman, A. K., Giuntoli, G., & Cattan, M. (2013). Social capital as a resource for mental well-being in older people: A systematic review. Aging & Mental Health, 17(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2012.742490
Page, D. G., Stephen J. (2019). Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events (4 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429023002
Page, L. C., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2016). Improving college access in the United States: Barriers and policy responses. Economics of Education Review, 51, 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.02.009
Parsons, M., Glavac, S., Hastings, P., Marshall, G., McGregor, J., McNeill, J., Morley, P., Reeve, I., & Stayner, R. (2016). Top-down assessment of disaster resilience: A conceptual framework using coping and adaptive capacities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.07.005
Pearson-Stuttard, J., Bandosz, P., Rehm, C. D., Penalvo, J., Whitsel, L., Gaziano, T., Conrad, Z., Wilde, P., Micha, R., Lloyd-Williams, F., Capewell, S., Mozaffarian, D., & O’Flaherty, M. (2017). Reducing US cardiovascular disease burden and disparities through national and targeted dietary policies: A modelling study. PLOS Medicine, 14(6), e1002311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002311
Perry, B. L., Aronson, B., & Pescosolido, B. A. (2021). Pandemic precarity: COVID-19 is exposing and exacerbating inequalities in the American heartland. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8), e2020685118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020685118
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., & Bennett, S. E. (2020). The dynamics among entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth in the Eurozone countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(5), 1106–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2020.01.004
Romero-Perdomo, F., & González-Curbelo, M. Á. (2023). Integrating Multi-Criteria Techniques in Life-Cycle Tools for the Circular Bioeconomy Transition of Agri-Food Waste Biomass: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065026
Sá, T., Ferreira, J. J. M., & Jayantilal, S. (2023). Open innovation strategy: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2022-0638
Salazar, N. B. (2021). Existential vs. essential mobilities: Insights from before, during and after a crisis. Mobilities, 16(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1866320
Shaw, B. J., van Vliet, J., & Verburg, P. H. (2020). The peri-urbanization of Europe: A systematic review of a multifaceted process. Landscape and Urban Planning, 196, 103733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103733
Splitter, V., Dobusch, L., von Krogh, G., Whittington, R., & Walgenbach, P. (2023). Openness as Organizing Principle: Introduction to the Special Issue. Organization Studies, 44(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221145595
Strambo, C., Nilsson, M., & Månsson, A. (2015). Coherent or inconsistent? Assessing energy security and climate policy interaction within the European Union. Energy Research & Social Science, 8, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.04.004
Stromquist, N. P., & Monkman, K. (2014). Globalization and Education: Integration and Contestation across Cultures. R&L Education.
Teixeira, A. A. C., & Queirós, A. S. S. (2016). Economic growth, human capital and structural change: A dynamic panel data analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1636–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.006
Wood, S., & Bellis, M. (t.t.). Socio-economic inequalities in alcohol consumption and harm: Evidence for effective interventions and policy across EU countries.
Zaman, R., Atawnah, N., Haseeb, M., Nadeem, M., & Irfan, S. (2021). Does corporate eco-innovation affect stock price crash risk? The British Accounting Review, 53(5), 101031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101031
Almustafa, H., Nguyen, Q. K., Liu, J., & Dang, V. C. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 on firm risk and performance in MENA countries: Does national governance quality matter? PLOS ONE, 18(2), e0281148. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281148
Alradhawi, M., Shubber, N., Sheppard, J., & Ali, Y. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental well-being amongst individuals in society- A letter to the editor on “The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus and COVID-19 pandemic: A review.” International Journal of Surgery (London, England), 78, 147–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.070
Baldissera, A. (2023). Sustainability reporting in banks: History of studies and a conceptual framework for thinking about the future by learning from the past. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2491
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022). Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carvajal, M., Nadeem, M., & Zaman, R. (2022). Biodiversity disclosure, sustainable development and environmental initiatives: Does board gender diversity matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 969–987. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2929
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dumenu, W. K., & Obeng, E. A. (2016). Climate change and rural communities in Ghana: Social vulnerability, impacts, adaptations and policy implications. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.010
Fang, E. F., Xie, C., Schenkel, J. A., Wu, C., Long, Q., Cui, H., Aman, Y., Frank, J., Liao, J., Zou, H., Wang, N. Y., Wu, J., Liu, X., Li, T., Fang, Y., Niu, Z., Yang, G., Hong, J., Wang, Q., … Woo, J. (2020). A research agenda for ageing in China in the 21st century (2nd edition): Focusing on basic and translational research, long-term care, policy and social networks. Ageing Research Reviews, 64, 101174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2020.101174
Fatemi, F., Ardalan, A., Aguirre, B., Mansouri, N., & Mohammadfam, I. (2017). Social vulnerability indicators in disasters: Findings from a systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.09.006
Gaynor, T. S., & Wilson, M. E. (2020a). Social Vulnerability and Equity: The Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19. Public Administration Review, 80(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13264
Gaynor, T. S., & Wilson, M. E. (2020b). Social Vulnerability and Equity: The Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 832–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13264
Giambartolomei, C., Vukcevic, D., Schadt, E. E., Franke, L., Hingorani, A. D., Wallace, C., & Plagnol, V. (2014). Bayesian Test for Colocalisation between Pairs of Genetic Association Studies Using Summary Statistics. PLOS Genetics, 10(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004383
Giunta, V., Bäckman, E., Salirwe, M. E., & Kalyonge, J. (2023). Risky Business: The Intersection of Sustainability and Credit Risk Assessment – a Strategic Perspective. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-25186
Góes, H. A. de A., Fatima, G., Santos Jhunior, R. de O., & Boaventura, J. M. G. (2023). Managing for stakeholders towards corporate environmental sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1561–1572. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2448
Greene, M. (2018). Socio-technical transitions and dynamics in everyday consumption practice. Global Environmental Change, 52, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.007
Haider, M., Shannon, R., Moschis, G. P., & Autio, E. (2023). How Has the COVID-19 Crisis Transformed Entrepreneurs into Sustainable Leaders? Sustainability, 15(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065358
Kim, D. D., & Neumann, P. J. (2020). Analyzing the Cost Effectiveness of Policy Responses for COVID-19: The Importance of Capturing Social Consequences. Medical Decision Making, 40(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20922987
Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder Engagement: Past, Present, and Future. Business & Society, 61(5), 1136–1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211066595
Madani, R. A. (2019). Analysis of Educational Quality, a Goal of Education for All Policy. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 100–109.
Maddaloni, F. D., & Sabini, L. (2022). Very important, yet very neglected: Where do local communities stand when examining social sustainability in major construction projects? International Journal of Project Management, 40(7), 778–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.08.007
Markkula, J. (2021). ‘We move the world’: The mobile labor of Filipino seafarers. Mobilities, 16(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1880129
Mei, C. (2020). Policy style, consistency and the effectiveness of the policy mix in China’s fight against COVID-19. Policy and Society, 39(3), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1787627
Mohamed, S., & Thomas, M. (2017). The mental health and psychological well-being of refugee children and young people: An exploration of risk, resilience and protective factors. Educational Psychology in Practice, 33(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2017.1300769
Moslehpour, M., Chau, K. Y., Tu, Y.-T., Nguyen, K.-L., Barry, M., & Reddy, K. D. (2022). Impact of corporate sustainable practices, government initiative, technology usage, and organizational culture on automobile industry sustainable performance. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(55), 83907–83920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21591-2
Nyqvist, F., Forsman, A. K., Giuntoli, G., & Cattan, M. (2013). Social capital as a resource for mental well-being in older people: A systematic review. Aging & Mental Health, 17(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2012.742490
Page, D. G., Stephen J. (2019). Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events (4 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429023002
Page, L. C., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2016). Improving college access in the United States: Barriers and policy responses. Economics of Education Review, 51, 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.02.009
Parsons, M., Glavac, S., Hastings, P., Marshall, G., McGregor, J., McNeill, J., Morley, P., Reeve, I., & Stayner, R. (2016). Top-down assessment of disaster resilience: A conceptual framework using coping and adaptive capacities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.07.005
Pearson-Stuttard, J., Bandosz, P., Rehm, C. D., Penalvo, J., Whitsel, L., Gaziano, T., Conrad, Z., Wilde, P., Micha, R., Lloyd-Williams, F., Capewell, S., Mozaffarian, D., & O’Flaherty, M. (2017). Reducing US cardiovascular disease burden and disparities through national and targeted dietary policies: A modelling study. PLOS Medicine, 14(6), e1002311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002311
Perry, B. L., Aronson, B., & Pescosolido, B. A. (2021). Pandemic precarity: COVID-19 is exposing and exacerbating inequalities in the American heartland. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8), e2020685118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020685118
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., & Bennett, S. E. (2020). The dynamics among entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth in the Eurozone countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(5), 1106–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2020.01.004
Romero-Perdomo, F., & González-Curbelo, M. Á. (2023). Integrating Multi-Criteria Techniques in Life-Cycle Tools for the Circular Bioeconomy Transition of Agri-Food Waste Biomass: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065026
Sá, T., Ferreira, J. J. M., & Jayantilal, S. (2023). Open innovation strategy: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2022-0638
Salazar, N. B. (2021). Existential vs. essential mobilities: Insights from before, during and after a crisis. Mobilities, 16(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1866320
Shaw, B. J., van Vliet, J., & Verburg, P. H. (2020). The peri-urbanization of Europe: A systematic review of a multifaceted process. Landscape and Urban Planning, 196, 103733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103733
Splitter, V., Dobusch, L., von Krogh, G., Whittington, R., & Walgenbach, P. (2023). Openness as Organizing Principle: Introduction to the Special Issue. Organization Studies, 44(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221145595
Strambo, C., Nilsson, M., & Månsson, A. (2015). Coherent or inconsistent? Assessing energy security and climate policy interaction within the European Union. Energy Research & Social Science, 8, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.04.004
Stromquist, N. P., & Monkman, K. (2014). Globalization and Education: Integration and Contestation across Cultures. R&L Education.
Teixeira, A. A. C., & Queirós, A. S. S. (2016). Economic growth, human capital and structural change: A dynamic panel data analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1636–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.006
Wood, S., & Bellis, M. (t.t.). Socio-economic inequalities in alcohol consumption and harm: Evidence for effective interventions and policy across EU countries.
Zaman, R., Atawnah, N., Haseeb, M., Nadeem, M., & Irfan, S. (2021). Does corporate eco-innovation affect stock price crash risk? The British Accounting Review, 53(5), 101031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101031
Published
2022-12-30
How to Cite
Putra, A., Haris, A., Sari Dewi, L., & Yunicha Harly, A. (2022). Education Dynamics Amid Economic Crisis: Access, Quality, Prosperity Through Policy, Society. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 14(2), 1041-1060. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v14i2.3931
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2022 Adi Putra, Abd Haris, Lizabeth Sari Dewi, Aulia Yunicha Harly
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit manuscript retain its copyright and grant publisher right of first publication licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to access (search, read, download, and cite), share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon any material) the work for any lawful purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Qalamuna: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama.
