The Role of Technology in Transforming Classroom Instruction: An Analysis of Blended Learning Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v16i2.5227Keywords:
Role; Technology; Teaching in the Classroom; Blended LearningAbstract
This research explores how technology has changed teaching methods in the classroom through a blended learning approach. The research method used in this study is literature studies, which look for references appropriate to the research context. The study's findings suggest that technology can increase student engagement, facilitate access to a wider range of learning activities, and improve learning outcomes through more interactive and flexible methods. When strategically integrated into the learning process, technology improves teaching efficiency and prepares students with the skills needed for the digital age. The implications of these findings are important for education stakeholders in designing and implementing teaching practices that harness the potential of technology to improve the learning process in the classroom. Further research is suggested to conduct empirical studies involving experiments in real classrooms to measure the direct impact of technology and blended learning approaches on student engagement and learning outcomes.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abdumutalibovich, K. A., & Lutfillaevna, B. M. (2023). The Role of Bim Technologies in the Information System of Education. European Journal of Contemporary Business Law & Technology: Cyber Law, Blockchain, and Legal Innovations, 1(2), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.61796/ejcblt.v1i2.87
Abidova, N. (2023). Creating an Inclusive Educational Environment for Children with Special Educational Needs. Journal of Engineering and Technology, 27, 36–38. https://zienjournals.com
Albeta, S. W., Suarman, Islami, N., Copriady, J., & Alimin, M. (2023). Blended Learning: Learning Outcomes, Class Dynamics, and Perceptions of Students and Teachers Systematic Literature Review. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 29(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.17762/kuey.v29i1.359
Antin, T. M. J., Constantine, N. A., & Hunt, G. (2015). Conflicting Discourses in Qualitative Research: The Search for Divergent Data within Cases. Field Methods, 27(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X14549926
Asmawi, A., Dong, H., Zhang, X., & Sun, L. (2024). Exploring the transformative power of blended learning for Business English majors in China (2012–2022) – A bibliometric voyage. In Heliyon (Vol. 10, Issue 2). Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24276
Budnyk, O. (2016). Educational Model of a Modern Student: European Scope. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 3(2–3), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.3.2-3.9-14
Cao, W. (2023). A meta-analysis of effects of blended learning on performance, attitude, achievement, and engagement across different countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1212056. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212056
Chasteen, S. (2017). Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. In Physics Today (Vol. 70, Issue 5). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1063/pt.3.3556
Chen, H., Sun, D., Yang, Y., Looi, C. K., & Jia, F. (2023). Detecting and visualizing research trends of blended learning: A bibliometric analysis of studies from 2013-2022. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10), 2336. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13592
Coutts, G., Coleman, K., Silverman, J., Kallio-Tavin, M., Eça, T., Pataky, G., Elsheikh, S., Bodkin, P., & Khalil, S. (2024). Innovative learning spaces: Visions for the future(s) of education. International Journal of Education Through Art, 20(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00155_1
Ergashevich, E. A. (2024). Case Analysis Of The Use Of Modern Teaching Tools And Technologies In Education. Journal Of Theory, Mathematics And Physics, 3(1), 126–132.
Ertem Akbaş, E., & Çavuş, H. (2020). Evaluation of Digital Content-Supported Transformation from Teachers’ Perspectives within the Scope of 2023 Education Vision. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(3), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.270.14
Fitria, D., Novia Al Husaeni, D., Bayu Dani Nandiyanto, A., Rokhman, M., Chalim, S., Chano, J., Sh Mahdi Al Obaidi, A., & Roestamy, M. (2024). How Technology Can Change Educational Research? Definition, Factors for Improving Quality of Education and Computational Bibliometric Analysis. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(2), 127–166.
Gould, R. (2024). Traditional statistical models in a sea of data: teaching introductory data science. In This Volume on (Issue is the volume on, p. 81). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Susanne-Podworny/publication/379084545_Reasoning_with_data_models_and_modeling_in_the_big_data_era_Editors_Colophon/links/65faf906a4857c79626545e5/Reasoning-with-data-models-and-modeling-in-the-big-data-era-Editors-Colophon.pdf#page=81
Green, D., Allan, C. N., & Crough, J. (2024). What Is the Purpose? Using Blended Learning Designs to Purposefully Focus on Student Engagement, Support, and Learning. In Blended Learning Designs in STEM Higher Education: Putting Learning First (pp. 35–58). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6982-7_3
Hawkridge, D. (2022). New Information Technology in Education. In New Information Technology in Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003312826
Indrawati, S. M., & Kuncoro, A. (2021). Improving Competitiveness Through Vocational and Higher Education: Indonesia’s Vision For Human Capital Development In 2019–2024. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 57(1), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2021.1909692
Jayarathna, N. G. D. A., & Herath, H. M. M. N. (2024). Perception about Student Engagement in Blended Learning Instructional Design : Evidence from Sri Lankan Universities. Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 3(2), 157–170.
Khoiruddin, M. A., & Takhmid. (2024). Learning Innovation based on seTARA daring in the Community Learning Activity Center. At-Tadzkir: Islamic Education Journal, 3(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.59373/attadzkir.v3i1.61
Kusumastiti, W. (2024). ANALYZING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BLENDED LEARNING MODELS FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP, 7(2), 3375–3380.
Lancaster, E. A. (2022). Blended learning: Impacts on the student experience. In Digital Learning in Higher Education: COVID-19 and Beyond (pp. 46–56). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800379404.00011
Manzanares, M. C. S., Llamazares, M. D. C. E., & González, Á. A. (2020). Effectiveness of blended learning in nursing education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051589
Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in this research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667
MARTYNIUK, M., KYRYLENKO, K., KRYMETS, L., MAKHOMETA, T., & MADI, H. (2022). The Relationship of the Philosophy of Education and the History of Philosophy: A Forecast of Educational Trends 2022-2024. Wisdom, 4(3), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v4i3.835
Min, W., & Yu, Z. (2023). A Systematic Review of Critical Success Factors in Blended Learning. Education Sciences, 13(5), 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050469
Miramon, S. R. (2024). Teacher Leadership in the Philippines : Evaluating its Impact on K-12 Education Reform. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE, 1(1), 162–167.
Morton, C. E., Saleh, S. N., Smith, S. F., Hemani, A., Ameen, A., Bennie, T. D., & Toro-Troconis, M. (2016). Blended learning: How can we optimize undergraduate student engagement? BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0716-z
Moskalenko, L., Huleikova, I., & ... (2024). Psychological Aspects of Blended Learning in Ukraine: Supporting Student Interest and Motivation To Achieve Learning Goals. Conhecimento & …, 16(41), 292–312. https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/conhecimento_diversidade/article/view/11439%0Ahttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/conhecimento_diversidade/article/view/11439/4366
Nanda Nur Rafiana. (2023). Technopreneurship Strategy to Grow Entrepreneurship Career Options for Students in Higher Education. ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI), 5(2), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.34306/ajri.v5i2.995
Nickerson, R. S. (2013). & Zodhiates (P. P (ed.)). Routledge.
Nofirman, N., Salong, A., Rachman, A., Zulkarnain, I., & Bangun, E. U. P. br. (2024). The Attractiveness of Blended Learning in the 21st Era in Higher Education. Al-Hijr: Journal of Adulearn World, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.55849/alhijr.v3i1.578
Oybek, M., & Asian, T. ". (2024). Basic Principles and Rules of Innovative Pedagogical Technologies in the Educational Process. Models and Methods in Modern Science, 3(1), 84–93. http://www.econferences.ru/index.php/mmms/article/view/11638
Pham, Q. H., & Vu, K. P. (2024). Leveraging lecturers’ intelligence for student engagement enrichment in blended learning courses. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2334930. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2334930
Putra, F. W., Rangka, I. B., Aminah, S., & Aditama, M. H. R. (2023). ChatGPT in the higher education environment: Perspectives from the theory of high order thinking skills. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), 45(4), e840–e841. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad120
Ratislavová, K., & Ratislav, J. (2014). Asynchronous email interview as a qualitative research method in the humanities. Human Affairs, 24(4), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0240-y
Richardson, H. (2018). Characteristics of a Comparative Research Design. In Classroom (pp. 1–7). https://classroom.synonym.com/characteristics-comparative-research-design-8274567.html
Sedyh, T. A., Amirova, L. A., Fazlutdinova, A. I., Galikeeva, G. F., Galimova, J. M., Suhanova, N. V, & Sattarov, V. N. (2024). EVALUATING THE EDUCATIONAL POTENTIAL OF AN E-LEARNING COURSE IN BLENDED LEARNING CONTEXTS. International Development Planning Review, 23(1), 370–387.
Suryono, W., Haryanto, B. B., Santosa, T. A., Rahman, A., Suharyat, Y., & Sappaile, B. I. (2023). The Effect of the Blended Learning Model on Student Critical Thinking Skill: Meta-analysis. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(1), 1386–1397. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i1.6087
T. Kilag, O. K., Heyrosa-Malbas, M., Sebial, M. U., & Mayol, J. M. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of Experimental Learning Approach and Traditional Teacher Professional Development Programs. European Journal of Higher Education and Academic Advancement, 1(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.61796/ejheaa.v1i1.27
Venkateswaran, P. S., Ayasrah, F. T. M., Nomula, V. K., Paramasivan, P., Anand, P., & Bogeshwaran, K. (2023). Applications of artificial intelligence tools in higher education. In Data-Driven Decision Making for Long-Term Business Success (pp. 124–136). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2193-5.ch008
Widjaja, G., & Aslan, A. (2022). Blended Learning Method in The View of Learning and Teaching Strategy in Geography Study Programs in Higher Education. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i1.1852
Williamson, B., Komljenovic, J., & Gulson, K. N. (2023). World Yearbook of Education 2024: Digitalisation of education in the era of algorithms, automation, and artificial intelligence. In B. Williamson, J. Komljenovic, & K. Gulson (Eds.), World Yearbook of Education 2024: Digitalisation of Education in the Era of Algorithms, Automation and Artificial Intelligence. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003359722
Xiao, G., & Zhang, M. (2024). Knowledge Mapping of Blended Learning Classroom Environment Studies (1996-2023). International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 19(01), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v19i01.43569
Xiao, M., Tian, Z., & Xu, W. (2023). Impact of teacher-student interaction on students’ classroom well-being under online education environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14669–14691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11681-0
Yasien, M., Elbyaly, H., Ibrahim, A., & Elfeky, M. (2023). The Impact of Blended Learning in Enhancing the Skill Performance of Producing Digital Content Among Students of Optimal Investment. Ann. For. Res, 66(1), 2031–2043. www.e-afr.org
Zheng, L., Umar, M., Safi, A., & Khaddage-Soboh, N. (2024). The role of higher education and institutional quality for carbon neutrality: Evidence from emerging economies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.008
Abidova, N. (2023). Creating an Inclusive Educational Environment for Children with Special Educational Needs. Journal of Engineering and Technology, 27, 36–38. https://zienjournals.com
Albeta, S. W., Suarman, Islami, N., Copriady, J., & Alimin, M. (2023). Blended Learning: Learning Outcomes, Class Dynamics, and Perceptions of Students and Teachers Systematic Literature Review. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 29(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.17762/kuey.v29i1.359
Antin, T. M. J., Constantine, N. A., & Hunt, G. (2015). Conflicting Discourses in Qualitative Research: The Search for Divergent Data within Cases. Field Methods, 27(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X14549926
Asmawi, A., Dong, H., Zhang, X., & Sun, L. (2024). Exploring the transformative power of blended learning for Business English majors in China (2012–2022) – A bibliometric voyage. In Heliyon (Vol. 10, Issue 2). Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24276
Budnyk, O. (2016). Educational Model of a Modern Student: European Scope. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 3(2–3), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.3.2-3.9-14
Cao, W. (2023). A meta-analysis of effects of blended learning on performance, attitude, achievement, and engagement across different countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1212056. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212056
Chasteen, S. (2017). Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. In Physics Today (Vol. 70, Issue 5). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1063/pt.3.3556
Chen, H., Sun, D., Yang, Y., Looi, C. K., & Jia, F. (2023). Detecting and visualizing research trends of blended learning: A bibliometric analysis of studies from 2013-2022. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10), 2336. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13592
Coutts, G., Coleman, K., Silverman, J., Kallio-Tavin, M., Eça, T., Pataky, G., Elsheikh, S., Bodkin, P., & Khalil, S. (2024). Innovative learning spaces: Visions for the future(s) of education. International Journal of Education Through Art, 20(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00155_1
Ergashevich, E. A. (2024). Case Analysis Of The Use Of Modern Teaching Tools And Technologies In Education. Journal Of Theory, Mathematics And Physics, 3(1), 126–132.
Ertem Akbaş, E., & Çavuş, H. (2020). Evaluation of Digital Content-Supported Transformation from Teachers’ Perspectives within the Scope of 2023 Education Vision. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(3), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.270.14
Fitria, D., Novia Al Husaeni, D., Bayu Dani Nandiyanto, A., Rokhman, M., Chalim, S., Chano, J., Sh Mahdi Al Obaidi, A., & Roestamy, M. (2024). How Technology Can Change Educational Research? Definition, Factors for Improving Quality of Education and Computational Bibliometric Analysis. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(2), 127–166.
Gould, R. (2024). Traditional statistical models in a sea of data: teaching introductory data science. In This Volume on (Issue is the volume on, p. 81). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Susanne-Podworny/publication/379084545_Reasoning_with_data_models_and_modeling_in_the_big_data_era_Editors_Colophon/links/65faf906a4857c79626545e5/Reasoning-with-data-models-and-modeling-in-the-big-data-era-Editors-Colophon.pdf#page=81
Green, D., Allan, C. N., & Crough, J. (2024). What Is the Purpose? Using Blended Learning Designs to Purposefully Focus on Student Engagement, Support, and Learning. In Blended Learning Designs in STEM Higher Education: Putting Learning First (pp. 35–58). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6982-7_3
Hawkridge, D. (2022). New Information Technology in Education. In New Information Technology in Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003312826
Indrawati, S. M., & Kuncoro, A. (2021). Improving Competitiveness Through Vocational and Higher Education: Indonesia’s Vision For Human Capital Development In 2019–2024. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 57(1), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2021.1909692
Jayarathna, N. G. D. A., & Herath, H. M. M. N. (2024). Perception about Student Engagement in Blended Learning Instructional Design : Evidence from Sri Lankan Universities. Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 3(2), 157–170.
Khoiruddin, M. A., & Takhmid. (2024). Learning Innovation based on seTARA daring in the Community Learning Activity Center. At-Tadzkir: Islamic Education Journal, 3(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.59373/attadzkir.v3i1.61
Kusumastiti, W. (2024). ANALYZING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BLENDED LEARNING MODELS FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP, 7(2), 3375–3380.
Lancaster, E. A. (2022). Blended learning: Impacts on the student experience. In Digital Learning in Higher Education: COVID-19 and Beyond (pp. 46–56). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800379404.00011
Manzanares, M. C. S., Llamazares, M. D. C. E., & González, Á. A. (2020). Effectiveness of blended learning in nursing education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051589
Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., & Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in this research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667
MARTYNIUK, M., KYRYLENKO, K., KRYMETS, L., MAKHOMETA, T., & MADI, H. (2022). The Relationship of the Philosophy of Education and the History of Philosophy: A Forecast of Educational Trends 2022-2024. Wisdom, 4(3), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v4i3.835
Min, W., & Yu, Z. (2023). A Systematic Review of Critical Success Factors in Blended Learning. Education Sciences, 13(5), 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050469
Miramon, S. R. (2024). Teacher Leadership in the Philippines : Evaluating its Impact on K-12 Education Reform. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE, 1(1), 162–167.
Morton, C. E., Saleh, S. N., Smith, S. F., Hemani, A., Ameen, A., Bennie, T. D., & Toro-Troconis, M. (2016). Blended learning: How can we optimize undergraduate student engagement? BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0716-z
Moskalenko, L., Huleikova, I., & ... (2024). Psychological Aspects of Blended Learning in Ukraine: Supporting Student Interest and Motivation To Achieve Learning Goals. Conhecimento & …, 16(41), 292–312. https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/conhecimento_diversidade/article/view/11439%0Ahttps://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/conhecimento_diversidade/article/view/11439/4366
Nanda Nur Rafiana. (2023). Technopreneurship Strategy to Grow Entrepreneurship Career Options for Students in Higher Education. ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI), 5(2), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.34306/ajri.v5i2.995
Nickerson, R. S. (2013). & Zodhiates (P. P (ed.)). Routledge.
Nofirman, N., Salong, A., Rachman, A., Zulkarnain, I., & Bangun, E. U. P. br. (2024). The Attractiveness of Blended Learning in the 21st Era in Higher Education. Al-Hijr: Journal of Adulearn World, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.55849/alhijr.v3i1.578
Oybek, M., & Asian, T. ". (2024). Basic Principles and Rules of Innovative Pedagogical Technologies in the Educational Process. Models and Methods in Modern Science, 3(1), 84–93. http://www.econferences.ru/index.php/mmms/article/view/11638
Pham, Q. H., & Vu, K. P. (2024). Leveraging lecturers’ intelligence for student engagement enrichment in blended learning courses. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2334930. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2334930
Putra, F. W., Rangka, I. B., Aminah, S., & Aditama, M. H. R. (2023). ChatGPT in the higher education environment: Perspectives from the theory of high order thinking skills. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), 45(4), e840–e841. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad120
Ratislavová, K., & Ratislav, J. (2014). Asynchronous email interview as a qualitative research method in the humanities. Human Affairs, 24(4), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0240-y
Richardson, H. (2018). Characteristics of a Comparative Research Design. In Classroom (pp. 1–7). https://classroom.synonym.com/characteristics-comparative-research-design-8274567.html
Sedyh, T. A., Amirova, L. A., Fazlutdinova, A. I., Galikeeva, G. F., Galimova, J. M., Suhanova, N. V, & Sattarov, V. N. (2024). EVALUATING THE EDUCATIONAL POTENTIAL OF AN E-LEARNING COURSE IN BLENDED LEARNING CONTEXTS. International Development Planning Review, 23(1), 370–387.
Suryono, W., Haryanto, B. B., Santosa, T. A., Rahman, A., Suharyat, Y., & Sappaile, B. I. (2023). The Effect of the Blended Learning Model on Student Critical Thinking Skill: Meta-analysis. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(1), 1386–1397. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i1.6087
T. Kilag, O. K., Heyrosa-Malbas, M., Sebial, M. U., & Mayol, J. M. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of Experimental Learning Approach and Traditional Teacher Professional Development Programs. European Journal of Higher Education and Academic Advancement, 1(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.61796/ejheaa.v1i1.27
Venkateswaran, P. S., Ayasrah, F. T. M., Nomula, V. K., Paramasivan, P., Anand, P., & Bogeshwaran, K. (2023). Applications of artificial intelligence tools in higher education. In Data-Driven Decision Making for Long-Term Business Success (pp. 124–136). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2193-5.ch008
Widjaja, G., & Aslan, A. (2022). Blended Learning Method in The View of Learning and Teaching Strategy in Geography Study Programs in Higher Education. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i1.1852
Williamson, B., Komljenovic, J., & Gulson, K. N. (2023). World Yearbook of Education 2024: Digitalisation of education in the era of algorithms, automation, and artificial intelligence. In B. Williamson, J. Komljenovic, & K. Gulson (Eds.), World Yearbook of Education 2024: Digitalisation of Education in the Era of Algorithms, Automation and Artificial Intelligence. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003359722
Xiao, G., & Zhang, M. (2024). Knowledge Mapping of Blended Learning Classroom Environment Studies (1996-2023). International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 19(01), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v19i01.43569
Xiao, M., Tian, Z., & Xu, W. (2023). Impact of teacher-student interaction on students’ classroom well-being under online education environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14669–14691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11681-0
Yasien, M., Elbyaly, H., Ibrahim, A., & Elfeky, M. (2023). The Impact of Blended Learning in Enhancing the Skill Performance of Producing Digital Content Among Students of Optimal Investment. Ann. For. Res, 66(1), 2031–2043. www.e-afr.org
Zheng, L., Umar, M., Safi, A., & Khaddage-Soboh, N. (2024). The role of higher education and institutional quality for carbon neutrality: Evidence from emerging economies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.008
Downloads
Published
2024-08-07
How to Cite
Hanafi, I., Alijoyo, F. A., Amin, H., Sudarsono, B. G., & Damayanto, A. (2024). The Role of Technology in Transforming Classroom Instruction: An Analysis of Blended Learning Approaches. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 16(2), 855–866. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v16i2.5227
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who submit manuscript retain its copyright and grant publisher right of first publication licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to access (search, read, download, and cite), share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon any material) the work for any lawful purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Qalamuna: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama.
