Representing the Muted Others on Social Media: Multimodal Analysis of @pelanginusantara_org’s Instagram Account

Authors

  • Bambang Haryono Universitas Trunojoyo, Madura, Indonesia
  • Nikmah Suryandari Universitas Trunojoyo, Madura, Indonesia
  • Farida Nurul Rahmawati Universitas Trunojoyo, Madura, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37680/adabiya.v20i2.7275

Keywords:

Digital Activism, Instagram, Multimodal Analysis, Muted Group Theory, LGBTQ, Queer Representation

Abstract

This study examined the representation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and the likes (LGBTQ+) identity in @pelanginusantara_org Instagram accounts in the midst of heteronormative dominance and marginalization of queer narratives by mainstream media in Indonesia. This study uses Muted Group Theory as the main theoretical framework to understand how queer communities construct counter-discourses against the symbolic structures that exclude them. The analysis was carried out through the multimodal analysis approach proposed by Kress & van Leeuwen, which was strengthened with the perspective of Butler’s gender performativity theory, in order to interpret visual, linguistic, and symbolic strategies in building queer identity in the digital space. The results show that this account uses strategies of visual affirmation, cultural localization, and affective narratives to challenge heteronormative discourses and create a more inclusive counter-public space. These findings confirm that social media, especially Instagram, has transformational potential for the LGBTQ+ community in Indonesia in negotiating identity and building a more equitable and humane alternative representation.

References

Abidin, C. (2020). Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring Attention Economies and Visibility Labours. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140

Anh, N. N. K., Hoan, H. Van, & Long, N. D. (2022). Social Media Affects the Attitudes of FPT Students From the LGBT Community Towards Coming Out to Their Parents. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(14), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i14.5545

Berger, J., Lim, S., & Wijaya, R. (2022). Queer Asia: Identitas, Budaya, dan Perlawanan Digital. NUS Press.

Bruns, H., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., Klement, K., Jonsson, M. L., & Rahali, B. (2018). Can nudges be transparent and yet effective? Journal of Economic Psychology, 65, 41–59.

Cho, A. (2018). Default publicness: Queer youth of color, social media, and being outed by the machine. New Media and Society, 20(9), 3183–3200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817744784

Craig, S. L., Eaton, A. D., McInroy, L. B., Leung, V. W. Y., & Krishnan, S. (2021). Social media participation enhances LGBTQ+ youth well-being. Social Media + Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988936

Duguay, S. (2016). “He has a way gayer Facebook than I do”: Investigating sexual identity disclosure and context collapse on a social networking site. New Media and Society, 18(6), 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814549930

Fauziani Hediana, D., & Winduwati, S. (2019). Dhiya Fauziani Hediana, Septia Winduwati: Self Disclosure Individu Queer Melalui Media Sosial Instagram (Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif pada Akun @Kaimatamusic) 493 Self Disclosure Individu Queer Melalui Media Sosial Instagram (Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif pada Akun @kaimatamusic). Koneksi, 3(2), 493–500.

Fox, J., & Ralston, R. (2016). Queer identity online: Informal learning and teaching experiences of LGBTQ individuals on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 635–642. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.009

Fraser, B. (1990). An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90096-V

Geismar, H., & Knox, H. (2021). Digital Anthropology; Second edition. 1–349.

Gieseeking, J. J. (2021). A Queer New York.

Gray, M. L. (2009). Out in the Country: Youth, Media, and Queer Visibility in Rural America. NYU Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=UzgTCgAAQBAJ

Hammack, P. L., Frost, D. M., & Hughes, S. D. (2019). Queer Intimacies: A New Paradigm for the Study of Relationship Diversity. Journal of Sex Research, 56(4–5), 556–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1531281

Hammack, P. L., Frost, D. M., Hughes, S. D., & Cooke, P. J. (2019). Queer intimacies: A new paradigm for the study of relationship diversity. Journal of Sex Research, 56(4–5), 556–592.

Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016). Instagrammatics and digital methods: studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1155332

Kramarae, C. (2005). Muted group theory1 and communication: Asking dangerous questions. Women and Language, 28(2), 55.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.

Kurnia, Novi, D. (2022). Tren Kajian Media, Gender dan Inklusi Sosial dalam Senarai Jurnal Komunikasi di Indonesia | Kurnia | Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. http://jurnal.upnyk.ac.id/index.php/komunikasi/article/view/6784/4663

McConnell-Ginet, S. (2020). Words Matter: Meaning and Power. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=mZ3wDwAAQBAJ

Miller, B., & Behm-Morawitz, E. (2016). “Masculine guys only”: The effects of femmephobic mobile dating application profiles on partner selection for men who have sex with men. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 176–185.

Nurfadila, F. dkk. (2024). View of Transformasi Identitas Individu Melalui Komunikasi Kontemporer di Sosial Media.pdf.

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ffMVDAAAQBAJ

Pawestri, A., & Pustaka, S. M. (2022). POLITIK HUKUM NEGARA TERHADAP GERAKAN, LESBIAN, GAY, BISEKSUAL DAN TRANSGENDER. SCOPINDO MEDIA PUSTAKA. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=njNcEAAAQBAJ

Rodríguez, D. G., & Murtagh, B. (2022). Situating anti-LGBT moral panics in Indonesia: Homophobia, criminalisation, acceptance, and religiosity. Indonesia and the Malay World, 50(146), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2022.2038871

Stalgaitis, C. A., Wagner, D. E., Navarro, M., Hoffman, L., & Delahanty, J. (2018). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Young Adult Tobacco Use: A Multiple Mediation Analysis Exploring the Role of Engagement with LGBT Culture in Smoking Disparities. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(2), S41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.11.082

Syaiful Yahya, M. K., Ahmad, F. A., Hanifah, N., & Nurdin, A. (2024). Analisis Konflik Isu LGBT di Indonesia Perspektif Dakwah Persuasif. Anida (Aktualisasi Nuansa Ilmu Dakwah), 24(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.15575/anida.v24i2.35877

Treré, E. (2018). Hybrid media activism: Ecologies, imaginaries, algorithms. Routledge.

Van Vliet, L., Törnberg, P., & Uitermark, J. (2020). The Twitter parliamentarian database: Analyzing Twitter politics across 26 countries. PLoS One, 15(9), e0237073.

Wijaya, H. Y. (2025). Queer Indonesia: What’s queer about queer studies in Indonesia? Media, Culture and Society, 47(7), 1510–1521. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437251349987

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Bambang Haryono, Nikmah Suryandari, & Nurul Rahmawati, F. (2025). Representing the Muted Others on Social Media: Multimodal Analysis of @pelanginusantara_org’s Instagram Account. Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan Dan Keagamaan, 20(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.37680/adabiya.v20i2.7275