Effectiveness of Nautical Learning with Heuristic Strategy in Scientific Approach in terms of Critical Thinking Ability and Representation Flexibility
Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of implementing Heuristic Strategies within a Scientific Approach in nautical learning, focusing on Collision Prevention Regulations at Sea (P2TL). Despite the material's potential to enhance critical thinking skills and flexibility of representation, research applying Heuristic Strategies in the Scientific Approach still needs to be explored. Employing a quasi-experimental method with experimental and control classes, data collection involves written measurements. Research hypotheses are elucidated through inferential analysis, encompassing normality, homogeneity, and mean similarity tests on learning outcome scores. The results demonstrate that nautical learning with heuristic strategies in a scientific approach surpasses ordinary scientific approaches in fostering critical thinking skills and flexibility of representation. This research significantly contributes to advancing learning methodologies in nautics, particularly reinforcing students' critical thinking and representational flexibility. The implications provide educators with grounds to consider integrating Heuristic Strategies within Scientific Approaches to enhance nautical learning quality, aligning with evolving educational demands and student needs.
Downloads
References
Adnan, M. (2021). Mathematics Trainer Readiness for PAK-21 Integration in Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(4), 891–896. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.8006803
Akmam, A., Anshari, R., Jalinus, N., & Amran, A. (2019). Factors influencing the critical and creative thinking skills of college students in computational physics courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), 012172. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012172
Antoni, P. (2021). MINAT MAHASISWA TERHADAP PROSES PEMBELAJARAN DARING DIMASA PANDEMI COVID 19 DI UNIVERSITAS ISLAM INDRAGIRI TEMBILAHAN. EDUKASI, 9(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.32520/judek.v9i2.1732
Arpaci, I., Kaya, A., & Bahari, M. (2023). Investigating the Influence of an Arduino-Based Educational Game on Understanding Genetics among Secondary School Students. Sustainability, 15(8), 6942. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086942
As’ari, A. R., Kurniati, D., Maharani, S., & Basri, H. (2019). Ragam soal matematis untuk mengembangkan disposisi berpikir kritis. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Atweh, B., Lapinid, M. R. C., Limjap, A. A., Elipane, L. E., Basister, M., & Conde, R. L. (2023). Critical Analysis of Mathematics Education Doctoral Dissertations in the Philippines: 2009–2021. In Asian Research in Mathematics Education (pub.1158125676; pp. 69–95). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0643-7_4
Chernoff, E. J., & Sriraman, B. (2020). Heuristics and Biases. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pub.1125081579; pp. 327–330). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100010
Cheung, S. K. (2023). Mathematical Ability at a Very Young Age: The Contributions of Relationship Quality with Parents and Teachers via Children’s Language and Literacy Abilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(4), 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01338-x
Darby, N. M., & Rashid, A. M. (2017). Critical Thinking Disposition: The Effects of Infusion Approach in Engineering Drawing. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n3p305
Elia, I., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kolovou, A. (2009). Exploring strategy use and strategy flexibility in non-routine problem solving by primary school high achievers in mathematics. ZDM, 41(5), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0184-6
Ghanizadeh, A. (2017). The interplay between reflective thinking, critical thinking, self-monitoring, and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education, 74(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0031-y
Gigerenzer, G. (2023). How do narratives relate to heuristics? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, e94. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x22002710
Goos, M., O’Donoghue, J., Ní Ríordáin, M., Faulkner, F., Hall, T., & O’Meara, N. (2020). Designing a national blended learning program for “out-of-field” mathematics teacher professional development. ZDM, 52(5), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01136-y
Kattou, M., Kontoyianni, K., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2013). We are connecting mathematical creativity to mathematical ability. ZDM, 45(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0467-1
Kim, Y. R., Park, M. S., Moore, T. J., & Varma, S. (2013). Multiple levels of metacognition and their elicitation through complex problem-solving tasks. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.04.002
Leifler, O., Lindblom, L., Svensson, M., Gramfält, M., & Jönsson, A. (2020). Teaching sustainability, ethics, and scientific writing: An integrated approach. 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274220
Maharani, S., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., & Qohar, A. (2019). How the student's computational thinking ability on algebraic. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(9), 419–423.
Markula, A., & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: How teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x
Moore, T. J. (2020). Multiple Representations in Computational Thinking Tasks: A Clinical Study of Second-Grade Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09812-0
Mousoulides, N., & Sriraman, B. (2020). Heuristics in Mathematics Education. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pub.1125081682; pp. 331–333). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_172
Peter, E. (2012). Critical thinking: Essence for teaching mathematics and mathematics problem solving skills. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research, 5. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMCSR11.161
Prabawati, M. N., Herman, T., & Turmudi, T. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Berbasis Masalah dengan Strategi Heuristic untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematis. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i1.383
Rich, P. J. (2021). Measuring teacher beliefs about coding and computational thinking. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(3), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1771232
Sambell, R., Andrew, L., Devine, A., Darby, J., Beatty, S., & Godrich, S. (2021). Opportunities to identify and develop people skills: What university students need early in their degree journey. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 12(2), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2021vol12no2art1481
Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., Barrett, J., Van Dine, D. W., & McDonel, J. S. (2011). Evaluation of a learning trajectory for length in the early years. ZDM, 43(5), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0326-5
Sari, I. A., Yusrizal, Y., & Duskri, M. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Self-Assessment untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP melalui Pendekatan Saintifik. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 5(2), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v5i2.11975
Suryaningsih, T. (2019). HARD WORK AND PROBLEM SOLVING BASED ON KRULIK-RUDNICK’S HEURISTIC THEORY ON PROJECT BASED LEARNING WITH OQALE APPROACH OF 5th GRADE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS. JMIE (Journal of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education), 3(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.32934/jmie.v3i1.101
Tanujaya, B., Mumu, J., & Margono, G. (2017). The Relationship between Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance of Student in Mathematics Instruction. International Education Studies, 10, 78. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n11p78
Copyright (c) 2022 Makmur Makmur, Poerwanto Poerwanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit manuscript retain its copyright and grant publisher right of first publication licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to access (search, read, download, and cite), share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon any material) the work for any lawful purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Qalamuna: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama.
