The Influence of Leadership on Lecturer Performance at University in Makassar City

Megawaty Megawaty

doi:10.37680/qalamuna.v14i1.4887

Megawaty Megawaty Institut Bisnis dan Keuangan Nitro, Makassar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v14i1.4887

Keywords: Leadership; Lecturer Performance; Private University; State University

Abstract

This research aims to determine and analyze the influence of leadership on lecturer performance at state universities and private universities in Makassar city. The method used is quantitative, with multiple linear regression analysis using SPSS 22 as a processing data tool. The total sample in this study was 60, consisting of 30 lecturers at a state university and 30 lecturers at a private university. The research results in the conclusion in this study leadership which indicators (clarity of vision and mission, achievement of vision and mission, optimism, confidence, agility, setting an example, and delegation of authority) have a positive and significant impact partial and simultaneous test. The work of lecturers at state and private universities in the three teaching areas of education, research and publication, and community service is closely linked to making higher education more competitive. Leadership abilities in developing competence and commitment also heavily impact lecturer performance. Leadership who can set an example, act swiftly, delegate authority well, and maintain a high degree of optimism can enhance professor performance in public and private colleges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, A. F. N., Haerani, S., Hamid, N., & Reni, A. (2019). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Komitmen Organisasi Dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Guru Sekolah Menengah Atas Di Makassar. Hasanuddin Journal of Applied Business and Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 90–99.
Bayu Putra, R., & Fitri, H. (2021). Literature Review: Model Pengukuran Kinerja Dosen Dan Organizational Citezenship Behavior Berdasarkan Karakteristik Individu, Budaya Kerja Dan Perilaku Individu. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan, 2(4), 485–512. https://doi.org/10.31933/jimt.v2i4.447
DeRue, D. S., Ashford, S. J., & Myers, C. G. (2012). Learning Agility: In Search of Conceptual Clarity and Theoretical Grounding. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01444.x
Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005
Himawan, I., Taba, I., & Reni, A. (2019). The Effect of Leadership Style and Organizational Culture on Employee Performance Through Job Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable at Telkom Indonesia Regional VII Division. Hasanuddin Journal of Business Strategy, 1(3), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.26487/hjbs.v1i3.252
Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
Huschka, I. (2020). Leadership Creating Organizational, Interactional, and Individual Impact. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23227-6_7
Husni, M., Athamneh, A., & Jais, J. (2023). Achieving the Agility of Human Resources Through Job Empowerment Practices and Job Satisfaction : Empirical Evidence from the Banking Sectors. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 10(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2023.vol10.no2.0247
Joiner, B. (2019). Leadership Agility for Organizational Agility. Journal of Creating Value, 5(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964319868321
Larson, L., & DeChurch, L. A. (2020). Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams. Leadership Quarterly, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377
Lee, H. J., & Seong, M. H. (2020). A study on the effects of business service quality on satisfaction, commitment, performance, and loyalty at a private university. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO9.439
McMackin, J., & Heffernan, M. (2021). Agile for HR: Fine in practice, but will it work in theory? Human Resource Management Review, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100791
Mollet, L. S., & Kaudela-Baum, S. (2022). Critical HR capabilities in agile organisations a cross-case analysis in swiss SMEs. Review of Managerial Science, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00570-4
Nasrul, E., Masdupi, E., & Syahrizal. (2020). The Effect of Competencies and Job Stress on Work Engagement with Job Satisfaction as Mediating Variable. 124(2016), 717–730. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200305.138
Nizam, N. Z. (2023). Service Quality in the Distribution of Consumer Attitudes, Word of Mouth, and Private University Selection Decisions. Journal of Distribution Science, 10, 51–61.
Nursyam, N., & Rahmawati, D. (2021). Pengaruh Motivasi kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Dinas Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Economy Deposit Journal (E-DJ), 2(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.36090/e-dj.v2i2.920
Purwanto S.K. (2015). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Manajemen/, 14(01), 47–58.
Resmi, N. N., & Mekarsari, N. K. A. (2017). Pengembangan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta melalui Analisis SWOT. Prosiding Seminar : Revitalisasi Tata Kelola Perguruan Tinggi Juni 2017, 14, 178–191. fisip-unipas.com/asset/user_file/20171126023321_ni nyoman resmi & ni ketut adi mekarsari- prosiding revitalisasi tata kelola perguruan tinggi 2017.pdf
Rzepka, A., & Bojar, E. (2020). Leadership as One of the Factors Shaping the Development of an Agile Organization Teal Organizations in the Age of Economy 4.0 View project. March, 383–391. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339776997