Ecocriticism-Based Curriculum Development Strategies in Indonesia Universities: Evaluation and Recommendations

  • Akbar Al Masjid Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Yogyakarta
  • Onok Yayang Pamungkas Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
Keywords: Curriculum Development, Ecocritical, Literature Learning, Learning, Evaluation, Higher Education

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efforts to develop an ecocriticism-based curriculum in various universities in Indonesia and measure the effectiveness of these interventions in improving student understanding. The research method uses mixed methods. The study results show that lecturer training programs, curriculum changes, resource increases, and the use of technology contribute significantly to the improvement of understanding of literary ecocriticism. For this, universities with better curriculum quality and higher lecturer competence tend to produce better understanding among students. Universities with more faculty training programs and more intensive curriculum changes show a higher increase in understanding among students. In particular, leading universities investing in extensive faculty training programs and periodic curriculum revisions show more positive results than universities undertaking such interventions. Thus, this study shows that investment in lecturer training and increased access to literary resources are essential for successfully integrating ecocriticism into the literary curriculum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arofah, E. F. (2021). Evaluasi kurikulum pendidikan. Jurnal Tawadhu, 5(2), 218–229.
Azida, M., & Fitri, A. N. (2021). Analisis Isi Novel “Laut Bercerita” dalam Bingkai Ekofeminisme. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 11(2), 153–169.
Bore, A. (2006). Creativity, Continuity, and Context in Teacher Education: Lessons from the Field. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 22(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0814062600001634
Brzozowski, M., Palomares Cabanilles, M., Kowalewski, G., & Pełechaty, M. (2019). Environmental factors are responsible for the gyrogonite formation by an endangered macroalga, Lychnothamnus barbatus, a fertility indicator of past and present lacustrine ecosystems. Limnologica, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2019.125686
Bulkeley, H. (2019). Navigating climate’s human geographies: Exploring the whereabouts of climate politics. Dialogues in Human Geography, 9(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619829920
Caetano, N., López, D., & Cabré, J. (2015). Learning sustainability and social compromise skills—A new track is born.
Chang, L.-P. (2016). Spirits in the Material World: Ecocentrism in Native American Culture and Louise Erdrich’s Chickadee. Children’s Literature in Education, 47(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-015-9261-3
Choi, S. Y., Abel, M., Siqi-Liu, A., & Umanath, S. (2021). National Identity Can be Comprised of More Than Pride: Evidence From Collective Memories of Americans and Germans. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.09.004
Clarke, D. A. G. (2022). A Political Ecology of Ecologies: Walking in Glen Almond with Students and Immanent Ethics. In Journal of Autoethnography.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.
Crozier, G. K. D., & Schulte-Hostedde, A. I. (2015). Why Training in Ecological Research Must Incorporate Ethics Education in Hastings Center Report.
Dewi, N. (2017). Ekokritik dalam Sastra Indonesia: Kajian Sastra yang Memihak. Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2016.15102
Fenia, S. Z. (2018). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Pelatihan Dosen dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Dosen Pada Sekolah Tinggi X di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Benefita, 3(1), 76–83.
Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching Methods and Students’ Academic Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online, 2(9), 29–35.
Gifford, T. (2011). Pastoral, anti-pastoral, and post-pastoral. In The Cambridge Companion to Literature and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139342728.003
Glaesser, J. (2019). Competence in educational theory and practice: A critical discussion. Oxford Review of Education, 45(1), 70–85.
Hall, T. E., Piso, Z., Engebretson, J., & O’Rourke, M. (2018). Evaluating a dialogue-based approach to teaching about values and policy in graduate transdisciplinary environmental science programs. In PLoS ONE.
Huang, P. I.-M. (2017). Material feminism and ecocriticism: Nu Wa, White Snake, and Mazu. Neohelicon, 44(2), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-017-0399-4
Iovino, S., & Oppermann, S. (2014). Material ecocriticism. In Material Ecocriticism.
Juanda, J., & Afandi, I. (2024). Mengungkap Pesan Ekologis dalam Novel Negeri Lintasan Petir Karya Gerson Poyk: Studi Ekokritik. Logat: Jurnal Bahasa Indonesia Dan Pembelajaran, 11(1), 101–118.
Khosravi, G. D., Vengadasamy, R., & Raihanah, M. M. (2017). Ecoethical significance of wilderness in Pablo Neruda’s selected poems. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 17(3), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1703-04
Kusmaryono, I., Wijayanti, D., & Maharani, H. R. (2022). Number of Response Options, Reliability, Validity, and Potential Bias in the Use of the Likert Scale Education and Social Science Research: A Literature Review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 625–637.
Mann, S., Costello, K., Lopez, M., Lopez, D., & Smith, N. (2014). An ethical basis for sustainability in the worldviews of first-year students?
McBride, B. B., Brewer, C. A., Berkowitz, A. R., & Borrie, W. T. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, eco-literacy: What do we mean, and how did we get here? Ecosphere, 4(5), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00075.1
Palinkas, L. A., Mendon, S. J., & Hamilton, A. B. (2019). Innovations in mixed methods evaluations. Annual Review of Public Health, 40, 423–442.
Pamungkas, O. Y. (2021). Eko-Sufisme Jawa: Represents Ekokritik dalam Sastra [Javanese Eco-Sufism: Representations of Ecocriticism in Literature]. Lintas Nalar.
Pamungkas, O. Y., Widodo, S. T., Suyitno, & Endraswara, S. (2021). Metaphor as a Strategy of Language Politeness: A Study of the Novel Tetralogy by Ki Padmasusastra. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Politeness (ICLP 2020), 553(Iclp 2020), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210514.009
Purwanto, A., Asbari, M., & Julyanto, O. (2021). Pelatihan Publikasi di Jurnal International Bereputasi pada Dosen Universitas Faletehan. Journal of Community Service and Engagement, 1(01), 18–24.
Romansyah, R., Rahayu, S., Muchtar, H. S., & Sulastini, R. (2022). Manajemen Kurikulum Perguruan Tinggi Di Era Industri 4.0. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan, 9(1), 25–32.
Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality and Quantity, 36(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014301607592
Samsu. (2017). Metode penelitian: Teori dan Aplikasi Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Mixed Methods, serta Research & Development. Pustaka Jambi.
Simanihuruk, M., & Sukma, B. E. (2023). Peningkatan Kompetensi Dosen Vokasi Perhotelan dalam Meningkatkan Kurikulum Melalui Program Pemagangan di Industri Perhotelan. Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat, 3(2), 88–97.
Spring, E. (2018). “Without Manifest, None of the Book Would have Happened”: Place, Identity, and the Positioning of Canadian Adolescent Readers as Literary Critics. Children’s Literature in Education, 49(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-017-9313-y
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Alfabeta.
Sumartini, S., Harahap, K. S., & Sthevany, S. (2020). Kajian pengendalian mutu produk tuna loin precooked frozen menggunakan metode skala likert di perusahaan pembekuan tuna. Aurelia Journal, 2(1), 29–38.
Suwandi, S., Yunus, A., & Rahmawati, L. E. (2017). Ecological intelligence values in Indonesian language textbooks for junior high school students. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(September), 237–248.
Sykes, R., Keeble, A., Cordle, D., Scott, J., De Cristofaro, D., King, D., Rowcroft, A., & Srivastava, N. (2017). Contemporary studies network roundtable: Responding to Robert Macfarlane’s “Generation Anthropocene.” Open Library of Humanities, 3(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.153
Villanueva Romero, D. (2014). A material reading of Brenda Peterson’s Animal Heart. Forum for World Literature Studies, 6(1), 6–23.
Von Mossner, A. W. (2018). Green states of mind? Cognition, emotion, and environmental framing. Green Letters, 22(3), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/14688417.2018.1531723
Widianti, A. W. (2017). Kajian ekologi sastra dalam kumpulan cerpen pilihan kompas 2014 di tubuh tarra dalam rahim pohon. Diksatrasia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 1–9.
Wulandari, T. (2022). Evaluasi Keberhasilan Kurikulum Perguruan Tinggi Mengacu KKNI Menggunakan Sistem Pakar. Jurnal Tunas Pendidikan, 4(2), 267–274.
Yasir, S. N. H. (2018). Manajemen Peningkatan Kualitas Dosen (Studi Kasus pada Fakultas Tarbiyah UIN Malang). Journal of Research and Thought on Islamic Education (JRTIE), 1(1), 96–107.
Yuqin, J. (2017). Spatial imagination and postcolonial ecological consciousness in life of Pi. Interdisciplinary Studies of Literature, 1(3), 157–170.
Published
2024-11-09
How to Cite
Al Masjid, A., & Pamungkas, O. Y. (2024). Ecocriticism-Based Curriculum Development Strategies in Indonesia Universities: Evaluation and Recommendations. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 16(2), 1193-1208. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v16i2.5734
Section
Articles
Abstract views: 0 , PDF downloads: 0