Redesigning Heat Transfer Learning for Diverse Jakarta Elementary Students: A Cognitive Load–Optimized Virtual Lab (CLOVL)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v17i2.7959Keywords:
virtual lab, cognitive load, heat transfer, elementary education, eye-trackingAbstract
Elementary schools in Jakarta face gaps in science learning resources, resulting in uneven and often theoretical practical experiences for students. Virtual laboratories offer a pathway toward equity, yet poorly structured designs can trigger cognitive overload and undermine learning. This study examines how a virtual lab optimized with cognitive load theory—the Cognitive Load–Optimized Virtual Lab (CLOVL)—influences fifth graders’ conceptual understanding of heat transfer in six elementary schools (three central and three suburban) in Jakarta. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, we involved 120 students and 12 science teachers. The experimental group used CLOVL, which incorporated five-minute segments, pre-training of key vocabulary, narrative–visual modalities, and personalization through culturally Indonesian avatars. The control group used a conventional virtual lab. Quantitative data consisted of pre- and post-tests, an adapted cognitive load scale, and eye-tracking for a sub-sample (n = 40). Qualitative data were gathered from teacher interviews, classroom observations, and student focus groups. Results indicated higher conceptual understanding in the CLOVL group (normalized gain ⟨g⟩ = 0.52) compared to the control group (⟨g⟩ = 0.23), with a large standardized effect size (Hedges’ g ≈ 1.20), particularly in suburban schools, where gains were approximately 45% greater than in central schools. Integrative analyses showed shorter fixation durations and a higher proportion of gaze directed toward relevant areas. These findings support the application of cognitive load principles and underscore the role of cultural relevance in virtual lab design for urban Indonesian settings, while highlighting the theoretical, practical, and policy implications for further research.
References
Abril, E., & Callo, E. C. (2021). Implementation of Learning Continuity Plan (LCP) Related Variables Amidst Pandemic and Performance of the Secondary Schools, Division of San Pablo City: Input to Quality Assurance. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(2), 119–134.
Acharya, B. (2015). Effective E-Learning Adoption Policies in Developing Countries: A Case of Nepal with Conjoint-Based Discrete Choice Approach. 서울대학교 대학원.
Albers, F., Schumacher, F., & Rey, G. D. (2023). Different Types of Redundancy and Their Effect on Learning and Cognitive Load. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12592
Alemdag, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2018). Tinjauan Sistematis Pelacakan Mata dalam Pembelajaran Multimedia. Komputer & Pendidikan.
Andrade, J., David Huang, W., & Bohn, D. M. (2014). Multimedia’s Effect on College Students’ Quantitative Mental Effort Scores and Qualitative Extraneous Cognitive Load Responses in a Food Science and Human Nutrition Course. Journal of Food Science Education, 13(3), 40–46.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Proporsi Sekolah dengan Akses Komputer, 2022. Badan Statistika Pusat.
Beliaeva, T., Ferasso, M., Kraus, S., & Damke, E. J. (2020). Dynamics of Digital Entrepreneurship and the Innovation Ecosystem: A Multilevel Perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(2), 266–284.
Chu, H. E., Treagust, David F., Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2012). Evaluasi Pemahaman Siswa terhadap Konsep Termal dalam Konteks Sehari-hari. Jurnal Internsional Pendidikan Sains, 34.
Dinas, P. P. D. J. (2023). Rencana Strategis Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi DKI Jakarta 2023–2026.
Endres, T., Carpenter, S., & Renkl, A. (2024). Constructive Retrieval: Benefits for Learning, Motivation, and Cognitive Load. Learning and Instruction, 94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.XXXXXX
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices. Annals of Family Medicine, 11(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1549
Gog, T. van, & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye Tracking as a Tool to Study and Enhance Multimedia Learning: learning and Instruction, 20(2).
Guetterman, T. C., Fàbregues, S., & Sakakibara, R. (2021). Visuals in Joint Displays to Represent Integration in Mixed Methods Research: A Methodological Review. Methods in Psychology, 5, 100080.
Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Results in Health Science Mixed Methods Research Through Joint Displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561.
Heidig, S., Beege, M., Schroeder, N. L., Rey, G. D., & Schneider, S. (2024). The Instructor Presence Effect and Its Moderators in Instructional Video: A Series of Meta-Analyses. Educational Psychologist.
Hogg, N. (2007). Measuring Cognitive Load. In Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (pp. 188–194). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Johnson, R. E., Grove, A. L., & Clarke, A. (2019). Pillar Integration Process: A Joint Display Technique to Integrate Data in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 301–320.
Kemendikbudristek-Pusdatin. (2023). PembaTIK 2023: Memperkuat Pendidikan Digital dan Memberdayakan Guru sebagai Pemimpin Teknologi.
Kemendikbudristek. (2024). Ketentuan Alokasi Waktu Pembelajaran (Kurikulum Merdeka). Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/file/1711507788_manage_file.pdf
Kienitz, A., Krebs, M.-C., & Eitel, A. (2023). Seductive Details Hamper Learning Even When They Do Not Disrupt Processing. Instructional Science, 51, 595–616. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09632-w
Koning, B. B. de, Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a Framework for Attention Cueing in Instructional Animations: Guidelines for Research and Design. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 113–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9107-3
Leppink, J., Paas, F., Vleuten, C. P. . van der, Gog, T. van, & Merriënboer, J. J. G. van. (2013). Development of an Instrument for Measuring Different Types of Cognitive Load. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1058–1072. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1
Mayer, R. E. (2021a). Evidence-Based Principles for How to Design Effective Instructional Videos. Computer & Education, 166, 104–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104118
Mayer, R. E. (2021b). Prinsip Berbasis Bukti untuk Video Instruksional. Komputer & Pendidikan.
Mayer, R. E. (2024). The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
McLeod, J., Fisher, J., & Hoover, G. (2003). The Key Elements of Classroom Management: Managing Time and Space, Student Behavior, and Instructional Strategies. ASCD.
Merriënboer, J. J. G. van, & Sweller, J. (2005). Teori Beban Kognitif dan Pembelajaran Kompleks. Tinjauan Psikologi Pendidikan.
Miftah, M. (2022). Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Media Berbasis TIK untuk Optimalisasi Pembelajaran. Publica Indonesia Utama.
Moreno, R. A., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Personalized Messages that Promote Science Learning in Virtual Environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 165–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.165
Nafadilla, Panjaitan, K. R., Ayu, M. S., & Claudia, A. D. (2025). Efisiensi Penggunaan Waktu Pembelajaran sebagai Implementasi Manajemen Pendidikan di Kelas Sekolah Dasar Efficient Use of Learning Time as an Implementation of Educational Management in Elementary School Classes. JIIC: Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 11687–11692.
Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., & del Pozo Cruz, B., Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia Design for Learning: An Overview of Reviews with Meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329
Ouwehand, K., Kroef, A. van der, Wong, J., & Paas, F. (2021). Measuring Cognitive Load: Are There More Valid Alternatives to Likert Rating Scales? Frontiers in Education, 6, 702616.
Paas, F. (1992). Training Strategies for Attaining Transfer of Problem-Solving Skill in Statistics: A Cognitive Load Approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
Paas, F. (2010). Konseptualisasi Baru dalam CLT. Tinjauan Psikologi Pendidikan.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educational Psychologist.
Prince, M. J., Vigeant, M., & Nottis, K. E. K. (2012). Pengembangan Inventaris Konsep Panas dan Energi. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik.
Schuessler, K., Fischer, V., & Walpuski, M. (2025). Investigating Construct Validity of Cognitive Load Rating Scales. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09692-6
Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., Kühberger, A., & Johnson, J. G. (2019). A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods. Routledge, New York, NY.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.
Trypke, M., Stebner, F., & Wirth, J. (2023). Two Types of Redundancy in Multimedia Learning: A Literature Review. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148035
Tseng, C. H., Chao, C.-J., & Lin, S.-F. (2023). Panas & Suhu Melalui Laboratorium Fisik vs. Virtual. Journal Pendidikan Sains Baltik.
UNICEF Indonesia. (2021). Strengthening Digital Learning across Indonesia : A Study Brief. Unicef. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/media/10531/file/StrengtheningDigitalLearningacrossIndonesia%3AAStudyBrief.pdf
UNICEF Indonesia. (2023). Analisis Situasi untuk Lanskap Pembelajaran Digital di Indonesia. Unicef. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/media/13421/file/AnalisisSituasiuntukLanskapPembelajaranDigitaldiIndonesia.pdf
Wang, C., Zhang, M., Sesunan, A., & Yolanda, L. (2023). Peran Teknologi dalam Transformasi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Kemdikbud, 4(2), 1–7.
Zacharia, Olympiou, G., & Papaevripidou, M. (2008). Argumen untuk Menggabungkan Laboratorium Fisik dan Virtual. Jurnal Penelitian Penngajaran Sains.
Zhu-Tian, C., & Xia, H. (2022). Cross Data: Leveraging Text-Data Connections for Authoring Data Documents. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ichwan Ichwan, Mudayat Mudayat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit manuscript retain its copyright and grant publisher right of first publication licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to access (search, read, download, and cite), share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon any material) the work for any lawful purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Qalamuna: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama.






