Enhancing Numeric Literacy through Creative Mathematical Reasoning in the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum Framework

Inelsi Palengka; Lusiana Delastri; Tiara Indah Belopadang

doi:10.37680/qalamuna.v17i2.8008

Authors

Inelsi Palengka Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja
Lusiana Delastri Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja
Tiara Indah Belopadang Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v17i2.8008

Keywords:

Creative mathematical reasoning, Numeric literacy, Merdeka Belajar Curriculum, Mathematics learning

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of creative mathematical reasoning in improving students' numeracy literacy within the framework of the Independent Learning Curriculum. Numeracy literacy is a crucial competency that enables learners to comprehend and address real-world problems using mathematical concepts and skills. The Merdeka Learning Curriculum provides space for innovative approaches in learning, including the application of creative mathematical reasoning to improve students' numeracy literacy skills. Using a quantitative quasi-experimental design, the study involved junior high school students divided into two groups: an experimental group and a control group. The findings revealed that the experimental group achieved a higher average score (M = 78.9; SD = 10.53) compared to the control group (M = 67.8; SD = 5.30). Statistical analysis using paired and independent t-tests confirmed a significant improvement in the performance of the experimental group (p < 0.05). The results demonstrate that creative mathematical reasoning significantly enhances students' comprehension, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. The study concludes that integrating creativity-based reasoning strategies is aligned with the Independent Learning Curriculum and offers valuable guidance for teachers to design more innovative, student-centered math learning experiences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adawiyah, R., Muin, A., & Khairunnisa, K. (2017). Mathematical Inductive-Creative Reasoning, A Theoretical Study. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 57, 247–251.

Afriansyah, A., Arif, D. B., & Islam, K. R. (2024). Development of Civics Learning through COLAKTRA (Congklak Nusantara) Innovation as a Traditional Game-Based Learning Media. Journal of Insan Mulia Education, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.59923/joinme.v2i1.93

Allsop, Y. (2019). Assessing the computational thinking process using a multiple evaluation approach. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 19, 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.10.004

Amir, M. F., Septiarini, A. R., & Darmawan, M. (2023). Mathematical Literacy-Oriented Student Worksheets for the Sidoarjo Context. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 13(148), 1–16.

Anggraini, C. M., Warniasih, K., & Jana, P. (2019). Development of Student Work Sheets Based on Contextual Learning to Facilitate Mathematical Concept Understanding Skill of Junior High School Students in 7th Grade. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v9i1.2773

Bilbao, J., García, O., Rebollar, C., Bravo, E., & Varela, C. (2016). Skills, attitudes, and concepts of Computational Thinking are essential tools for conducting scientific research. Economics and Education, 82–87.

Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–71. https://doi.org/10.18200/JGEDC.2015214253

Birkeland, A. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ mathematical reasoning—How can it be developed? Mathematics Enthusiast, 16(1–3), 579–596.

Braun, D., & Huwer, J. (2022). Computational literacy in science education–A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 7(August), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.937048

C. da Silva, T., B. de Melo, J., & Tedesco, P. (2020). The Creative Process in the Development of Computational Thinking in Higher Education. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 215–226. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009346502150226

Cansoy, R., & Turkoglu, M. E. (2017). Examining the Relationship between Pre-Service Teachers’ Critical Thinking Disposition, Problem-Solving Skills, and Teacher Self-Efficacy. International Education Studies, 10(6), 23. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n6p23

Cho, Y., & Lee, Y. (2017). Possibility of Improving Computational Thinking Through Activity-Based Learning. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95(18), 4385–4393.

Clarke, D., & Roche, A. (2018). Using contextualized tasks to engage students in meaningful and worthwhile mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51(November 2016), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.006

Cooper, J., & Lavie, I. (2021). Bridging Incommensurable Discourses – A Commognitive Look at Instructional Design in the Zone of Proximal Development. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 61(October 2020), 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100822

Dagiene, V., & Stupuriene, G. (2016). Informatics Concepts and Computational Thinking in K-12 Education: A Lithuanian Perspective. Journal of Information Processing, 24(4), 732–739. https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjjip.24.732

Damayanti, R., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2018). Perbandingan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa antara Contextual Teaching and Learning dan Problem Based Learning. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 7(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v7i1.3078

Delyana, H., Yusri, R., Mardiyah, A., Istikhfar, I., & Ningsih, E. P. (2022). Pelatihan Penggunaan Software Geogebra dalam Memecahkan Soal Geometri Ruang Berbasis Contextual Teaching and Learning. ADMA : Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 3(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.30812/adma.v3i1.2094

Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, A., & Basnet, R. B. (2017). Algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: Exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(4), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0090-9

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., Harney, O. M., & Kavanagh, C. (2017). Facilitating a student-educator conceptual model of dispositions towards critical thinking through interactive management. Education Technology Research, 65, 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9460-7

Erna, N. D., Umi, K. A., & Ari, I. (2017). The Math Problem Solving Profile in Solve Linear Programming Problems Based on Mathematic Communication Ability. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 6(1), 53–59.

Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics (STEM) Project-Based Learning (PBL) Affects High, Middle, And Low Achievers Differently: The Impact Of Student Factors On Achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089–1113.

Hendriana, H., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Hidayat, W. (2018). Students’ Performance Skills in Creative Mathematical Reasoning. Infinity Journal, 7(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v7i2.p83-96

Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. (2018). Improving students’ creative mathematical reasoning abilities through adversity quotient and argument-driven inquiry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012005

Huang, Q., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Yang, W., & Song, Z. (2017). The contribution of parent–child numeracy activities to young Chinese children’s mathematical ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12152

Ijirana, I., & Mansyur, J. (2020). Patterns of Metacognitive Skills and External Representation of Students in Chemistry Problem Solving. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 25(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v25i2p58-65

Kanbay, Y., & Okanlı, A. (2017). The Effect of Critical Thinking Education on Nursing Students' Problem-Solving Skills†. Contemporary Nurse, 53(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2017.1339567

Kandemir, C. M., Kalelioğlu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2020). Pedagogy of teaching introductory text‐based programming in terms of computational thinking concepts and practices. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22374

Kholid, M. N., Imawati, A., Swastika, A., Maharani, S., & Pradana, L. N. (2021). How is Students’ Conceptual Understanding for Solving Mathematical Problems? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012018

Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(6), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0867-3

Lozano-Arias, J., Rodríguez-Sedano, F. J., González-Alonso, M.-I., & Conde, M. Á. (2021). Using Educational Robotic Exoskeleton for the Acquisition of Cross-Curricular Competences in Higher Education. Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’21), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/3486011.3486418

Maharani, S., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., & Abd.Qohar. (2021). The Effectiveness of Computational Thinking-Based Learning (CTBL) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Learning Models on Learning Achievements Reviewed From Brain Dominance. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 15(2), 1050–1057. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v15i2.14458

Mlotshwa, N., Tunjera, N., & Chigona, A. (2020). Integration of Moodle into the classroom for better conceptual understanding of functions in mathematics. South African Journal of Education, 40(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n3a1570

Muin, A., Hanifah, S., & Diwidian, F. (2018). The effect of creative problem solving on students’ mathematical adaptive reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conference …, Query date: 2023-09-06 09:20:59. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012001

Norqvist, M., Jonsson, B., Lithner, J., Qwillbard, T., & Holm, L. (2019). Investigating algorithmic and creative reasoning strategies by eye tracking. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55(April), 100701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.03.008

Olsson, J. (2017). GeoGebra, enhancing creative mathematical reasoning [PhD Thesis]. Institutionen för tillämpad utbildningsvetenskap.

Palayukan, H., Langi, E. L., Palengka, I., & Hima, L. R. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa Berdasarkan Teori Van Hiele pada Materi Kubus dan Balok. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 879–884. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v4i2.366

Presmeg, N. (2016). Semiotics as a Tool for Learning Mathematics: How to Describe the Construction, Visualisation, and Communication of Mathematical Concepts by Adalira Sáenz-Ludlow & Gert Kadunz (Eds.). Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2016.1184953

Putra, Y., Puji, E., Nur, A., & Satrio, A. (2023). Study the Literature of PISA-Based Test Instruments on Students ’ Mathematical Reasoning Ability. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 6, 47–51.

Saad, A., & Zainudin, S. (2024). A review of teaching and learning approaches in implementing Project-Based Learning (PBL) with Computational Thinking (CT). Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 7622–7646. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2328280

Small, M. (2017). Teaching Mathematical Thinking: Tasks and Questions for Strengthening Practices and Processes. Teachers College Press.

Tee, K. N., Leong, K. E., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2018). The Mediating Effects of Critical Thinking Skills on Motivation Factors for Mathematical Reasoning Ability. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0396-z

Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27(November 2017), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003

Yunita, Y., Muzakkir, M., & Samwil, S. (2023). Peran Penyiar dalam Menjadikan ‘Numpang Nampang’ sebagai Program Unggulan PRO2 LPP RRI Meulaboh. Aceh Anthropological Journal, 7(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.29103/aaj.v7i1.10057