Strengthening Teacher Professional Development through Teacher Working Groups: Insights from Educational Administration and Institutional Ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v18i1.9252Keywords:
Teacher Working Group; Sustainable Professional Development; Educational Administration; Institutional Ethics; Educational GovernanceAbstract
The Teacher Working Group (Kelompok Kerja Guru/KKG) plays a strategic role in supporting Sustainable Professional Development (Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan/PKB) for elementary school teachers. However, previous studies have predominantly examined KKG from pedagogical perspectives, while limited attention has been given to its administrative governance and institutional ethics dimensions. This study aims to analyze the role of KKG in enhancing teacher professionalism in Gowa Regency through the perspectives of educational administration and institutional ethics. A qualitative case study approach was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with KKG administrators, elementary school teachers, and school supervisors, supported by observations and document analysis. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that KKG functions as a collaborative learning community that facilitates the sharing of teaching practices, pedagogical reflection, and professional competence development. Nevertheless, its effectiveness is constrained by weak strategic planning, limited resource and logistics management, inadequate coordination with educational authorities, and insufficient internalization of organizational ethics. Furthermore, teacher participation is often driven by administrative obligations rather than professional commitment, reducing the transformative potential of KKG activities. The study concludes that the success of teacher professional development through KKG depends not only on program implementation but also on the quality of institutional governance encompassing administrative, managerial, and ethical dimensions. Strengthening institutional capacity, participatory leadership, and sustainable policy support is therefore essential to optimize the role of KKG in improving the quality of elementary education.
References
Admiraal, W., Schenke, W., De Jong, L., Emmelot, Y., & Sligte, H. (2021). Schools as professional learning communities: What can schools do to support professional development of their teachers?
Al Shawabkeh, K. (2024). The impact of strategic agility on sustainable competitive advantage: The mediating role of strategic renewal at Jordanian telecommunication companies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(1), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.36
Alamgir, W., & Shan, H. (2023). Clinical Leadership and Integration of Triple Bottom Line for Planetary Health. Life and Science, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.37185/lns.1.1.439
Alim, M., & Sulley, S. (2024). Beyond Healing: Embracing the Triple Bottom Line Approach in Post-pandemic Healthcare. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.54019
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Bari, N., Chimhundu, R., & Chan, K. C. (2022). Dynamic Capabilities to Achieve Corporate Sustainability: A Roadmap to Sustained Competitive Advantage. Sustainability, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031531
Bhadra, K. V., Kamalanabhan, T. J., & Singh, S. K. (2024). Evolution of dynamic capabilities for business sustainability performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(6), 5583–5605. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3767
Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to Improve: How America’s Schools Can Get Better at Getting Better. Harvard Education Press.
Bush, T. (2020). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management (5th ed.). Sage.
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2016). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 36(5), 553–571.
Campbell, C. (2017). Developing teachers as change agents: Positive teacher professional identities. Professional Development in Education, 43(1), 1–13.
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Chaudhuri, S. (2022). The Impact of Dynamic Capability on Business Sustainability of Organizations. FIIB Business Review, 11(4), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145221107432
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
Darling-Hammond, L. (2019). Teaching and learning for deeper learning. Harvard Educational Review, 89(3), 421–443.
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2016). Learning by Doing: A Handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work. Solution Tree Press.
Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Public Bureaucratic Reform in Indonesia.
Eikelenboom, M., & Jong, G. (2019). The impact of dynamic capabilities on the sustainability performance of SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1360–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.013
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone Publishing.
Fullan, M. (2016). The New Meaning of Educational Change.
Giddens, A. (2010). Sociology.
Hairon, S., & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 405–424.
Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership and teacher learning in educational reform. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 563–565.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School.
Hord, S. M. (2015). Professional Learning Communities.
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The Adult Learner.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22.
Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2011). Teachers in Professional Communities: Improving Teaching and Learning.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook.
Mintzberg, H. (2009). Managing.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
Saputra, M. H., Utomo, M. N., Ariansyah, K., Wismayanti, Y. F., Ansyah, R. H. A., Koeswinarno, & Suradi. (2024). Small and medium-sized enterprises dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage: The mediating effect of digitalization. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 12(3), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2024.120303
Shang, H., Chen, R., & Li, Z. (2020). Dynamic sustainability capabilities and corporate sustainability performance. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2011
Suhardiman, B. (2019). Institutional strengthening of teacher working groups in the development of professionalism of elementary school teachers. Journal of Education and Culture, 24(3), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v24i3.1234
Teece, D. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). Together we are better: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34.
Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47–59.
Vergunst, F., Berry, H. L., Rugkasa, J., Burns, T., Molodynski, A., & Maughan, D. L. (2020). Applying the triple bottom line of sustainability to healthcare research. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 32(1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzz049
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Djohar Djohar, Dety Yunita Sulanjari, Asdar Muhammad Nur

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit manuscript retain its copyright and grant publisher right of first publication licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to access (search, read, download, and cite), share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon any material) the work for any lawful purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Qalamuna: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama.






