Integrating Universal Design for Learning and Individualized Education Plans in Inclusive Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Siti Rokhmah Sobariah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Budi Susetyo Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Iding Tarsidi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Eka Yuli Astuti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Ezza Mad Baguri INTI International University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v18i1.9329

Keywords:

Universal Design; Learning; Education; Inclusive; Curriculum

Abstract

Inclusive education requires curriculum frameworks that accommodate learner diversity while ensuring individualized support for students with special educational needs. Although Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) are widely recognized as complementary approaches, evidence regarding their integration within inclusive curriculum design remains fragmented. This study aims to synthesize research trends, implementation patterns, empirical impacts, and challenges associated with the integration of UDL and IEPs in inclusive education. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following the framework of Denyer and Tranfield (2009) and PRISMA guidelines. Literature published between 2015 and 2025 was retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, SpringerLink, Taylor & Francis, and Google Scholar. After a rigorous screening and quality appraisal process using CASP and JBI instruments, ten high-quality studies were included in the final synthesis. The findings reveal that UDL consistently enhances learning accessibility, student engagement, and academic achievement through flexible instructional design and multimodal learning opportunities. However, the integration of UDL and IEPs remains largely fragmented and is rarely institutionalized within formal curriculum policies. Successful implementation is supported by professional development, collaborative practices among educators, strong school leadership, and access to educational technology, while administrative burdens and limited policy alignment remain significant barriers. This review highlights the need for a systemic framework that integrates universal curriculum design with individualized planning to strengthen sustainable inclusive education practices.

References

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences.

Alquraini, T., & Rao, K. (2020). Examining teachers’ perceptions of Universal Design for Learning implementation in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(9). https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1492630

Basham, J. D. (2023). UDL 3.0 and systemic inclusive curriculum design.

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Capp, M. J., & Hardman, M. (2023). Advancing inclusive curriculum through Universal Design for Learning: A systematic synthesis. Educational Review.

Chita-Tegmark, M., Gravel, J. W., & Rose, D. H. (2021). Using the Universal Design for Learning framework to support inclusive education. Frontiers in Education, 6, 629969. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.629969

Coyne, M. D. (2018). Applying Universal Design for Learning in literacy instruction.

Dalton, B. (2019). Universal Design for Learning and literacy instruction.

Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a Systematic Review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. Sage Publications.

Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would You Recognize Universal Design for Learning if You Saw It? Learning Disability Quarterly.

Espada-Chavarria, R. (2023). Universal Design for Learning and instruction: Effective strategies for inclusive higher education. Education Sciences, 13(6), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060620

Florian, L. (2023). Inclusive pedagogy: Transforming teacher education for equity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.103941

Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal.

Fovet, F. (2020). Universal Design for Learning as a Transformative Framework. Routledge.

Friend, M. (2010). Collaboration Skills for School Professionals. Pearson.

Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Graham, L. J. (2021). Inclusive education and educational equity.

Hall, T. E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2015). Universal Design for Learning in the Classroom. Guilford Press.

Katz, J. (2015). Teaching to Diversity: The Three-Block Model of Universal Design for Learning. Portage & Main Press.

Kennedy, M. J. (2020). Teacher preparation for Universal Design for Learning implementation.

Kurth, J. A. (2021). Individualized Education Programs and inclusive education practices.

Kurth, J. A., & Gross, M. (2019). Inclusive education and collaborative planning practices.

Lowrey, K. A. (2020). Universal Design for Learning in inclusive mathematics education.

McLeskey, J. (2017). High-Leverage Practices in Special Education. CEC.

Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice. CAST Professional Publishing.

Morningstar, M. E. (2022). Improving outcomes through effective IEP implementation.

Ok, M. W., Rao, K., & Bryant, B. (2021). Universal Design for Learning in Pre-K to Grade 12 Classrooms: A Systematic Review of Research. Exceptionality, 29(4).

Rao, K., Torres, C., Smith, S., & McDougall, D. (2022). Universal Design for Learning in K–12 education: A systematic review of empirical studies. Educational Research Review, 36, 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100451

Roberts, J., Park, H. J., Brown, S., & Cook, B. (2021). Universal Design for Learning in inclusive classrooms: Teacher practices and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103465

Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. ASCD.

Saini, R., Nordin, Z., & Hashim, M. H. (2024). Universal Design for Learning to facilitate the learning of students with intellectual disabilities within the inclusive educational context. International Journal of Special Education, 39(2).

Scott, L. A., Temple, P., & Marshall, D. (2022). UDL and inclusive curriculum reform: Moving beyond differentiation. International Journal of Inclusive Education.

Sharma, U., & Salend, S. J. (2016). Teaching in inclusive classrooms.

Singal, N. (2019). Challenges and opportunities in inclusive education.

Smith, J., & Harvey, D. (2021). UDL implementation in inclusive schools.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sokal, L., & Katz, J. (2020). Teacher efficacy and inclusive education practices.

Spooner, F. (2017). Inclusive instructional design and Universal Design for Learning.

UNESCO. (2024). Global Education Monitoring Report 2024.

Waitoller, F. R., & King Thorius, K. (2016). Cross-pollinating culturally sustaining pedagogy and Universal Design for Learning.

Yell, M. L. (2019). The Law and Special Education.

Zhang, L., Basham, J. D., & Yang, S. (2023). Digital technologies and Universal Design for Learning: Implications for inclusive curriculum design. Computers & Education, 191, 104641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104641

Downloads

Published

2026-06-14

How to Cite

Sobariah, S. R., Susetyo, B., Tarsidi, I., Astuti, E. Y., & Baguri, E. M. (2026). Integrating Universal Design for Learning and Individualized Education Plans in Inclusive Education: A Systematic Literature Review. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 18(1), 787–800. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v18i1.9329

Issue

Section

Articles